Huh? I don't understand what you mean.

Look, I don't know what is on his birth certificate and really don't care- unless it proves he was ineligible for the presidency. However, I think the reason all this hasn't gone away is that none of it hurts Obama's polls. Maybe allowing the birthers to carry on and to demand something he refuses to comply with benefits him in some political way. Lets be real. Does anyone think any of the birthers would vote for Obama if he presented a "clean" birth certificate?

Not yet, but I haven't had much TV time lately. However, I will try to watch them this weekend. What times and channel(s) are they on?

The answer to the first question is probably "no."

However, don't fool yourself into thinking that this does not, in some way, hurt Idi Amin Jr. The last administration is a prime example of how ignoring someone screaming an outright lie hurts you in the end.

Did Bush lie about the "sixteen words" in his State of the Union speech? No. In fact, Congressional testimony says otherwise.

Was Bush responsible for Katrina? No. But you can't sit there and tell me that all of the hysteria in the aftermath didn't hurt him in the polls.

Hell, you had John Kerry all in a lather over his "swiftboating," and most of that information was true. The problem was - and every frickin' liberal idiot journalist is quick to point out - that he didn't counter the allegations quickly. Instead he let them fester. Nevermind the fact that a majority of the "lies" told about Kerry were actually true...

How quick some are to forget.

If Idi Amin Jr. is letting this thing fester to make himself look "good" in the polls, then he's dumber than I thought.