• If the original document was in a bound volume (as reflected by the curvature of the left hand side of the certificate), how can the green patterned background of the document's safety paper be so seamless?
its not that seemless, you can easily see the line/color difference
• Why, if Obama was born on August 4, 1961, was the “Date Accepted by Local Reg.” four days later on August 8, 1961?
uh, easy, the 4th was a friday. so monday there was a backlog, it didnt get done till tuesday. is this unusual? probably not
• What is the significance of the smudges in the box containing the name of the reported attendant?
nothing, im sure this is on lots of documents from the 60s, i doubt many people had bics then, and to help you, i googled it. BICs were released in the USA in 1960.
• David A. Sinclair, the M.D. who purportedly signed the document, died nearly eight years ago at age 81. So he is conveniently unavailable to answer questions about Obama’s reported birth.
give me a break. the guy died 8 years ago at a ripe old age, there is nothing convenient about that
• In the “This Birth” box there are two mysterious Xs above “Twin” and “Triplet.” Is there a sibling or two unaccounted for?
ugh, please just shutup. birthers are just getting crazy on this
• What is the significance of the mysterious numbers, seen vertically, on the document’s right side?
who cares
• Finally, the “Signature of Local Registrar” in box 21 may be a desperate attempt at establishing the document’s Hawaiian authenticity. Note to forgers: It is spelled “Ukulele.”
it appears to me to be ukhlee why doesnt someone just find out who the registar was in 1961 and see what his name is? cant be that hard. dont forget this is hawaii and not everyone has names like smith, johnson etc
PLEASE JUST LET THIS GO AWAY!
Papachristou wrote:
