HockeyDad
15 years ago
US Flag Code

When flags of two or more nations are displayed, they are to be flown from separate staffs of the same height. The flags should be of approximately equal size. International usage forbids the display of the flag of one nation above that of another nation in time of peace
HockeyDad
15 years ago
US Flag Code


No disrespect should be shown to the flag of the United States of America; the flag should not be dipped to any person or thing. Regimental colors, State flags, and organization or institutional flags are to be dipped as a mark of honor.

The flag should never be displayed with the union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property.
tailgater
15 years ago

Why? You claimed flying upside down flags and other flags is un-american. But when it is done by the tea party people it is somehow different.



Obviously? So when people are at a protest for immigration reform or hispanic civil rights where the protesters are primarily hispanic, these un-american activities are prominent, represent everyone up to and including La Raza making it their official position therefore making them all racist.

But when the protesters are tea-baggers protesting against Obama and they are primarily white, these un-american activities and racist signs are rare, represent only those few people and not the entire group or the groups the people are affiliated with.

Bullsh*t ten times.



I'm not surprised you would think that.

It's ok for the Irish to march under their flag because they have assimilated into the culture already. Their fight for respect, equality and access to the American Dream was over a long time ago. There was a time that Irish immigrants were treated the same way, hell even worse, than Hispanic immigrants today.

FuzzNJ wrote:




Fuzz doesn't see the difference between the tea party and la raza.
Fuzz, answer me this: Do you consider the use of the word "niggger" to be more or less offensive dependent upon the race of the person who says it?
Sure, it's aweful regardless of the source.
But I bet you don't physically wince when a black guy says it.

La Raza wants CRIMINALS to be allowed into our system based solely on thier race.
The tea party wants people of all races to come here only via the legal means.
And you don't see the difference when they protest because they both choose the same obscene gesture.

You're full of it.

You DO see the difference.
But you're too stubburn to admit it.
Because others on this board have repeated called you names so you feel compelled to try to always be right.

Stop digging your hole.
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Fuzz doesn't see the difference between the tea party and la raza.
Fuzz, answer me this: Do you consider the use of the word "niggger" to be more or less offensive dependent upon the race of the person who says it?
Sure, it's aweful regardless of the source.
But I bet you don't physically wince when a black guy says it.

La Raza wants CRIMINALS to be allowed into our system based solely on thier race.
The tea party wants people of all races to come here only via the legal means.
And you don't see the difference when they protest because they both choose the same obscene gesture.

You're full of it.

You DO see the difference.
But you're too stubburn to admit it.
Because others on this board have repeated called you names so you feel compelled to try to always be right.

Stop digging your hole.

tailgater wrote:



The policy difference I spoke of earlier is the dream act, and you disagree with it and how to resolve the issue of illegal immigration. All fine and good. The Tea-baggers also have policy differences and express their disagreements in similar ways.

The hispanic population is also pissed off because there are a whole lot more citizens who are hispanic that illegal ones, yet they are all lumped into the same category and laws are passed that would infringe on their civil liberties, like in AZ. I said if it were me I would be pissed off too.

But I do see the difference, contrary to your assertion. I see the difference in why you look at these groups differently. You, however, do not or refuse to admit it.

And I don't think I'm right because other people call me names, I think I'm right because most people do, don't you think? You walk around thinking 'gee, I'm wrong about everything, I have no confidence in my opinions"?
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago
:-&



FAMILY AUDIENCE


OUTRAGE!!!!
HockeyDad
15 years ago


BROKEN ARROW!
tailgater
15 years ago

The policy difference I spoke of earlier is the dream act, and you disagree with it and how to resolve the issue of illegal immigration. All fine and good. The Tea-baggers also have policy differences and express their disagreements in similar ways.

The hispanic population is also pissed off because there are a whole lot more citizens who are hispanic that illegal ones, yet they are all lumped into the same category and laws are passed that would infringe on their civil liberties, like in AZ. I said if it were me I would be pissed off too.

But I do see the difference, contrary to your assertion. I see the difference in why you look at these groups differently. You, however, do not or refuse to admit it.

And I don't think I'm right because other people call me names, I think I'm right because most people do, don't you think? You walk around thinking 'gee, I'm wrong about everything, I have no confidence in my opinions"?

FuzzNJ wrote:




If the hispanic population is pissed, they are taking the wrong approach to solving the issue at hand.
Instead of getting angry at white America, they ought to look within their own communities and help weed out the illegals rather than defend them.
And quite honestly, I'm shocked that they don't do this since it's not always easy for non-citizens to stay here and work here legally.
You'd think that they would resent those that want to bypass the system.

But when americans who happen to be white speak out against illegals who happen to be latino, the discussion gets bogged down with cries of racism by one side, which simply proves how weak their stance is to begin with.
DrafterX
15 years ago

You'd think that they would resent those that want to bypass the system.

tailgater wrote:




You'd think.... I remember driving thru Tulsa when Oklahoma kicked them out seeing signs being held up by kids that said stuff like 'Don't send my Daady Back' and stuff.... thought it was a bummer for the kids but at the same time Daddy should have done it right.. and by the age of the kids he certainly had time to accomplish something..... 😟
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago

You'd think.... I remember driving thru Tulsa when Oklahoma kicked them out seeing signs being held up by kids that said stuff like 'Don't send my Daady Back' and stuff.... thought it was a bummer for the kids but at the same time Daddy should have done it right.. and by the age of the kids he certainly had time to accomplish something..... 😟

DrafterX wrote:




Shudda dragged them too!

JUST SAY NO TO ANCHOR BABIES!!!
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago
NCLR Funding Skyrockets After Obama Hires Its VP
ViewDiscussion.Last Updated: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 12:54pm
A Judicial Watch investigation reveals that federal funding for a Mexican La Raza group that for years has raked in millions of taxpayer dollars has skyrocketed since one of its top officials got a job in the Obama White House.

The influential and politically-connected National Council of La Raza (NCLR) has long benefitted from Uncle Sam’s largess but the group has made a killing since Obama hired its senior vice president (Cecilia Muñoz) in 2009 to be his director of intergovernmental affairs.

Ignored by the mainstream media, Judicial Watch covered the appointment because the president issued a special “ethics waiver” to bring Muñoz aboard since it violated his own lobbyist ban. At the pro illegal immigration NCLR, Muñoz supervised all legislative and advocacy activities on the state and local levels and she was heavily involved in the congressional immigration battles that took place in the George W. Bush Administration.

She also brought in a steady flow of government cash that’s allowed the Washington D.C.-based group to expand nationwide and promote its leftist, open-borders agenda via a network of community organizations dedicated to serving Latinos. Among them are a variety of local groups that provide social services, housing counseling and farm worker assistance as well as publicly-funded charter schools that promote radical Chicano curriculums. Judicial Watch published a special report on this a few years ago.

This week a JW probe has uncovered details of the alarming increase in federal funding that these NCLR groups have received since Muñoz joined the Obama Administration. In fact, the government cash more than doubled the year Muñoz joined the White House, from $4.1 million to $11 million.

Not surprisingly, a big chunk of the money (60%) came from the Department of Labor, which is headed by a former California congresswoman (Hilda Solis) with close ties to the La Raza movement. Since Obama named her Labor Secretary, Solis has launched a nationwide campaign to protect illegal immigrant workers in the U.S. Just this week Solis penned declarations with Guatemala and Nicaragua to preserve the rights of their migrants.

The NCLR also received additional taxpayer dollars from other federal agencies in 2010, the JW probe found. The Department of Housing and Urban Development doled out $2.5 million for housing counseling, the Department of Education contributed nearly $800,000 and the Centers for Disease Control a quarter of a million.

Additionally, NCLR affiliates nationwide raked in tens of millions of government grant and recovery dollars last year thanks to the Muñoz factor. An offshoot called Chicanos Por La Causa (CPLC) saw its federal funding nearly double to $18.3 million following Muñoz’ appointment.

A social service and legal assistance organization (Ayuda Inc.) that didn’t receive any federal funding between 2005 and 2008 got $600,000 in 2009 and $548,000 in 2010 from the Department of Justice. The group provides immigration law services and guarantees confidentiality to assure illegal aliens that they won’t be reported to authorities.



http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/jun/nclr-funding-skyrockets-after-obama-hires-its-vp 




They're under the Obama Cone of Protection.[frypan]
HockeyDad
15 years ago

Ignored by the mainstream media, Judicial Watch covered the appointment because the president issued a special “ethics waiver” to bring Muñoz aboard since it violated his own lobbyist ban.

DrMaddVibe wrote:




Special ethics waiver? I got your special ethics waiver right here!
FuzzNJ
15 years ago
More from the copy and paste king.
DrafterX
15 years ago
HockeyDad
15 years ago

More from the copy and paste king.

FuzzNJ wrote:




What did you post?
DrafterX
15 years ago
I heard illegals are reponsible for all the wildfires out in Arizona right now..... SECURE THE BORDERS!!!! [ram27bat]
teedubbya
15 years ago
did someone say fencepost?
DrMaddVibe
15 years ago

More from the copy and paste king.

FuzzNJ wrote:




Facts that slap you in the face with reality.

You cannot find this information.

You dwell on your knees at the Owebama pants party.

Just think of my c&p's as educating the weak and insipid. I know I do!

McBryde
15 years ago

did someone say fencepost?

teedubbya wrote:



^ +1

Sharp as marbles!

E
FuzzNJ
15 years ago

Facts that slap you in the face with reality.

You cannot find this information.

You dwell on your knees at the Owebama pants party.

Just think of my c&p's as educating the weak and insipid. I know I do!

DrMaddVibe wrote:



I say something like that, only much, much nicer when I cut and paste, but no one likes the explanation, even if I say it with more tact.
HockeyDad
15 years ago

I say something like that, only much, much nicer when I cut and paste, but no one likes the explanation, even if I say it with more tact.

FuzzNJ wrote:





Maybe you're just always wrong.
Users browsing this topic