"Surgeon general, I believe I know why this is happening. I have found a direct correlation between the anger, and T.M.I. [goes to a whiteboard and beings writing out the equation: Anger=(L×W)/(M^2-∠)+YAW ] Anger equals length times width over mass squared minus angle of the shaft plus yaw. [finishes and looks at the surgeon general] Look, we all get angry, but when someone is consistently angry or always finding new reasons to be angry, it means they have a very very very very small d*ck."

FuzzNJ wrote:

Well, your self-examination and thesis is well thought out and reasoned but only you know that for sure or not.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Another 'I know you are, but what am I?' response? Sad.

FuzzNJ wrote:

Actually there was no "what am I" component. You have overstated once again.

HockeyDad wrote:

Ahem...the premise was that I would vote for a D over a R not who introduced legislation.

Nice try to deflect though.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

"Surgeon general, I believe I know why this is happening. I have found a direct correlation between the anger, and T.M.I. [goes to a whiteboard and beings writing out the equation: Anger=(L×W)/(M^2-∠)+YAW ] Anger equals length times width over mass squared minus angle of the shaft plus yaw. [finishes and looks at the surgeon general] Look, we all get angry, but when someone is consistently angry or always finding new reasons to be angry, it means they have a very very very very small d*ck."

FuzzNJ wrote:

Typical New Jersey Democrat. It's the votes of folks who think like Fuzz that put these jack butts in power.

dpnewell wrote:

It's obvious that you don't know how I think...

FuzzNJ wrote:

You claiming you didn't vote for Lautenberg? Kind of find that hard to believe.

dpnewell wrote:

I did vote for him.

FuzzNJ wrote:

So...are you saying that you DO put party over principle?

borndead1 wrote:

I did vote for him, but just like most elections it's the choice of the lesser of two evils. I wish someone else would have stepped up when the corrupt guy went down.

I'll ask you then. If there is an election where there is a R and a D and the R supports say an anti-smoking bill or indefinate detention, and the D does not. Would you then vote for the Democratic candidate?

FuzzNJ wrote:

Thanks for the conversation. You helped me prove DP is full of sh*t. Have a great day.

FuzzNJ wrote:

I vote principal over party or popularity. You have admitted in this thread that you’ll vote for the lesser of two evils. Instead of voting for the best person, you’ll vote for someone you may have reservations about, just to keep a so called “greater evil” out of office. Yet I’m the one full of sh*t. OK, cookie boy, whatever helps you feel better about yourself.

dpnewell wrote:

one must choose the one that agrees with your positions the most frequently and has the possibility of being elected.

FuzzNJ wrote:

This is why we need to add "None of the Above" as a choice on every ballot for every office.

yardobeef wrote:

If "None of the Above" wins, a new election is called with all prior candidates ineligible to run again.

yardobeef wrote: