rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
14 years ago

Sounds as though you're a Democrat mole in Republican sheep's clothing (pardon the animal mixed metaphor).
Giving the Republican candidate of "your choice" false hope before you pull the final lever on Obama.[-x 🤥

bloody spaniard wrote:




We'll just have to wait and see.
View All Posts by User
HockeyDad
14 years ago

Sounds as though you're a Democrat mole in Republican sheep's clothing (pardon the animal mixed metaphor).
Giving the Republican candidate of "your choice" false hope before you pull the final lever on Obama.[-x 🤥

bloody spaniard wrote:




Not much of a mole since he's already ruled out every candidate except Mittens. Mittens has long been selected as the loser in Obama's reelection.
View All Posts by User
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
14 years ago
If you believe that privacy and social welfare rights aren't subject to presidential politics, you are naivete.
View All Posts by User
tailgater
14 years ago

If you believe that privacy and social welfare rights aren't subject to presidential politics, you are naivete.

rfenst wrote:



Define privacy.
I don't know if you're talking about the sodomy type or the Big Brother type.

As for social welfare, again be specific.
Using your earlier example of abortion, please remember that Roe v Wade was decided during Nixon. And despite 5 1/2 terms of Republican Presidents since that time, not one has even hinted at applying pressure to overturn the decision.

See my original point: the right and the left use these factors to win votes.
Romney has to be "pro life" in order to win the GOP ticket.
Means nothing towards the ruling should he win.

Likewise for the Gay marriage.
Bill Clinton didn't push for national acceptance of a gay marriage law, and neither did Obama.
But they will tell you that they're in favor so they win the Dem ticket.

These are two polarizing subjects, yet they're the LAST thing that will change based on a sitting president.

But because it's so emotionally charged and more interesting than, say, the deficit, it'll be a major factor in how people vote. And that's sad.




Note: I'm not suggesting that their power to appoint justices doesn't influence social laws. Simply that the POTUS can't be bothered enough by such issues to base their choices accordingly.


View All Posts by User
Russiancrusher
14 years ago
Couldn't vote for someone who wears " magic underwear" (Romney). (Google: Mormon Underwear). Yet, he's the only one I could tolerate. I doubt that either Obama or any Republican can make any difference after the next election. Things won't improve under any president for at least 6-10 years.
View All Posts by User
RICKAMAVEN
14 years ago
re Santorum

this quarter wit brought his wife's miscarriage home to introduce it to his kids who will eventually
require therapy to overcome the idiotic trauma he has caused them.

his chance of being nominated is a joke.
View All Posts by User
RICKAMAVEN
14 years ago
russiancrusher

i googled and saw pictures of magic undewear.


these were listed as tags
underwear weird strange wtf epic fail stupid drunk
View All Posts by User
Russiancrusher
14 years ago

re Santorum

this quarter wit brought his wife's miscarriage home to introduce it to his kids who will eventually
require therapy to overcome the idiotic trauma he has caused them.

his chance of being nominated is a joke.

RICKAMAVEN wrote:




Not to mention that he aand his wife slept with the fetus in their bed.#-o
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

Not to mention that he aand his wife slept with the fetus in their bed.#-o

Russiancrusher wrote:




He had twins?

WHOA!

Here I thought he took it home in a doggie bag and let the breathing kids play with the feti.

I love this place.

You learn something every damn day![frypan]
View All Posts by User
tailgater
14 years ago

re Santorum

this quarter wit brought his wife's miscarriage home to introduce it to his kids who will eventually
require therapy to overcome the idiotic trauma he has caused them.

his chance of being nominated is a joke.

RICKAMAVEN wrote:




I doubt this was like the Cheers episode when Lillith put the dead rat in her purse.

But it's good to know that you base your vote on the important stuff.


You would think that a guy born into a Jewish family would have more tolerance of others faith.
View All Posts by User
frankj1
14 years ago
You would think that a guy born into a Jewish family would have more tolerance of others faith.



Hey TG, like Hebrew National, we answer to a higher authority, right?

Yes I am kidding. That was too easy.

View All Posts by User
tailgater
14 years ago

You would think that a guy born into a Jewish family would have more tolerance of others faith.



Hey TG, like Hebrew National, we answer to a higher authority, right?

Yes I am kidding. That was too easy.

frankj1 wrote:




I'm not familiar with the Hebrew National advertising campaigns, but no worry I knew you were kidding.


Rick has been on a (probably) medicated rant lately, and his disdain for anything deeply religious yet unique has shown on more than one occassion.

We often hear his tales about being raised as a poor black child in the streets of Brooklyn, and he's used these fables to justify his (ahem) heightened awareness. Yet he routinely blasts the religious right and in this instance he is poking his 4 ft high nose into a man's personal grief and core beliefs.

He's a hypocrite.
View All Posts by User
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

I'm not familiar with the Hebrew National advertising campaigns, but no worry I knew you were kidding.


Rick has been on a (probably) medicated rant lately, and his disdain for anything deeply religious yet unique has shown on more than one occassion.

We often hear his tales about being raised as a poor black child in the streets of Brooklyn, and he's used these fables to justify his (ahem) heightened awareness. Yet he routinely blasts the religious right and in this instance he is poking his 4 ft high nose into a man's personal grief and core beliefs.

He's a hypocrite.

tailgater wrote:




And you are a hypocrite as well by thinking your personal beliefs are somehow beyond discussion and that you don't have the right to be offended.

You, and other conservatives, on this site constantly attack people who don't agree with you, especially on the left, by calling them the worst names possible. Yet somehow you think your 'beliefs' can't be critisized? Now that's being a hypocrite.
View All Posts by User
ZRX1200
14 years ago
When the person attacking never shows the ability for civil disagreement I tend to side with tailgater.


That said I love my crazy uncle Rick.
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

And you are a hypocrite as well by thinking your personal beliefs are somehow beyond discussion and that you don't have the right to be offended.

You, and other conservatives, on this site constantly attack people who don't agree with you, especially on the left, by calling them the worst names possible. Yet somehow you think your 'beliefs' can't be critisized? Now that's being a hypocrite.

FuzzNJ wrote:





LAZY



OUTRAGE
View All Posts by User
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
14 years ago

Couldn't vote for someone who wears " magic underwear" (Romney). (Google: Mormon Underwear). Yet, he's the only one I could tolerate. I doubt that either Obama or any Republican can make any difference after the next election. Things won't improve under any president for at least 6-10 years.

Russiancrusher wrote:



Eh, a person's under-garments are his or her private matter. You know, like a Jew who wears tzitzit.

As to the economy, I think you are right. And then, it will be time for another boom- or at least good times.

Here in Orlando, we need our housing and labor markets to balance out. More tourists will help as well. Other cities and states across the nation will improve and faster because of our housing glut, but that will just help Orlando via tourism.

Right now, I think that the European Unions' member nations' financial woes are the biggest threat to economic recovery. Jobs are up (a bit). Raw product purchases and stock piles by manufacturers are growing. The new hire outlook by manufacturers looks better. It is also just a mater of time. Five to 10 years is not unrealistic, but I hope it will be sooner.
View All Posts by User
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

When the person attacking never shows the ability for civil disagreement I tend to side with tailgater.


That said I love my crazy uncle Rick.

ZRX1200 wrote:



Talking about DMV, right?
View All Posts by User
tailgater
14 years ago

And you are a hypocrite as well by thinking your personal beliefs are somehow beyond discussion and that you don't have the right to be offended.

You, and other conservatives, on this site constantly attack people who don't agree with you, especially on the left, by calling them the worst names possible. Yet somehow you think your 'beliefs' can't be critisized? Now that's being a hypocrite.

FuzzNJ wrote:



What a troll.

It is absolutely fair for me to criticize a man directly, and to label him a hypocrite, without being one myself.

I never said my beliefs can't be criticized. Nor are the actions defined above even within my own faith or beliefs.

So how, pray tell, is that being a hypocrite?

And while it's on my mind, this board could use a little less of the sophomoric "I know you are, but what am I?" defense mechanism that you've embraced in your post above.
What's next? The "I'm rubber and you're glue" routine?
Or how about just saying "Oh yeah?"

I'd say you must be a hoot at parties, but I'm thinking you're not allowed to hang around with the adults any more.




View All Posts by User
frankj1
14 years ago

I'm not familiar with the Hebrew National advertising campaigns, but no worry I knew you were kidding.


Rick has been on a (probably) medicated rant lately, and his disdain for anything deeply religious yet unique has shown on more than one occassion.

We often hear his tales about being raised as a poor black child in the streets of Brooklyn, and he's used these fables to justify his (ahem) heightened awareness. Yet he routinely blasts the religious right and in this instance he is poking his 4 ft high nose into a man's personal grief and core beliefs.

He's a hypocrite.

tailgater wrote:


whoa whoa whoa! You really never heard that Hebrew National ad?
View All Posts by User
tailgater
14 years ago

whoa whoa whoa! You really never heard that Hebrew National ad?

frankj1 wrote:



I'm quite familiar with the Hebrew National brand, but I can honestly say that I don't ever recall reading, or seeing or hearing an ad for them.
I'm sure I have. I just haven't parked it into the ol' memory sponge.
View All Posts by User
Users browsing this topic
Mobile! Terms | Privacy | Contact Us | Help | © 1998-2026, CigarBid.com