Any examples?

FuzzNJ wrote:

I'm sure you can find a few!

HockeyDad wrote:

ayup, full of crap, just like I thought.

FuzzNJ wrote:

Use the Google. You have spare time.

HockeyDad wrote:

.....and when they try to stomp out the fire it gets all over their shoes!


You gotta admit....it is pretty funny when someone details their well studied opinion on a matter and then you copy-n-paste it into Google and it matches a bunch of blogs verbatim.

HockeyDad wrote:

Not so fast counselor.

This Op Ed was lifted because I wanted the libtards here to see how their ranks are falling off. They've lost their way. They were bamboozled...hoodwinked.

And then I added my own comment.

And when you do it it's what? Literary art? Loosen your shirt collar and relax.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

We are what we read?


BTW, remember when JTokash (dual PHD in Applied Mathematics and some type of advanced Engineering) was explaining a math problem to someone and "Jimmy" told him he didn't know what he was talking about- and then TG (?) Googled Jimmy's explanation and found it on a math tutorial site?

rfenst wrote:

The Google is a double edged sword!

HockeyDad wrote:

Not if you know how to quote and cite. Or, at least paraphrase.

rfenst wrote:

I blame it on laziness on the part of the flaming douchebags. They could at least put in a little effort to change a few words or rearrange some sentence structure.

HockeyDad wrote:

"laziness"



LMFAO!!!

rfenst wrote:

Yep. But only the hypocrites. When the use c&p it is because their articles are exemplary of what they believe.

When non-hypocrites (read so called "liberals") c&p it is only because they cannot cogently explain their positions on topics because they are brainwashed by the "liberal media". [sarcasm]

rfenst wrote:

Not so fast counselor.

This Op Ed was lifted because I wanted the libtards here to see how their ranks are falling off. They've lost their way. They were bamboozled...hoodwinked.

And then I added my own comment.

And when you do it it's what? Literary art? Loosen your shirt collar and relax.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Well, spoonfeeding the weak is ending. The herd is thinning and they will be picked off first.

Put the original link up...put it in italics or bold it out...SOMETHING so the readers KNOW it's not something you actually said. Give credit to the original author...Don't rip them off! In PDX's case...and in Jimmy's...it was just an obvious attempt to appear knowledgable on a subject they didn't even have a rudimentary grasp on! Then the resulting articles were just a dogpile on the subject without even looking at the merits that others had posted. A lame shoutdown that didn't work. It never does when you have people that know the subject or at least do their own due diligence!

DrMaddVibe wrote:

I've put quotes or attribution on anything I've posted from other sources.

If one was to take your collected posts and commentary/criticism on everything you don't happen to agree with, one would have to conclude that you are a Rhodes Scholar and indisputable authority on a wider range of subjects that Leonardo da Vinci in his prime. Since I know that's not the case, the more rational conclusion is you honestly believe that all your thought processes are superior to anyone you happen to disagree with and you have no capacity for introspection/doubt as to the possibility some of your views may not be the be all and end all on a given subject, and you also don't have the capacity to have a philosophical disagreement with someone without it becoming a matter of you having to try and piss a little bit higher up on the wall to prove yourself right.

On the whole you make arguing with jpotts seem almost enjoyable by comparison.

pdxstogieman wrote:

Thanks for the laugh, but based on your posts...put away your crayons.

As far as anything to do with Philosophy and you goes...David Lee Roth already summed it up..."Life was "Take a hit of this" and I'd love to talk philosophy, but I've gotta take a piss. Man, that philosophy runs right through ya! Take it from me baby I've got experience"

You can read all the books you want to and quote all the blogs that support your addled POV but PLEASE don't try to eat off of Snickerdoodles plate with your high and mighty talk down to people BS. EVERYONE can see right through it. It's just...well, LAZY of you to go there!

DrMaddVibe wrote: