Rclay
  • Rclay
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
14 years ago
Who would take her now?
wheelrite
14 years ago
I'd Motorboat her
borndead1
14 years ago
I actually kinda hoped McCain would win in 2008. Much better eye candy. Palin of course, but also Meghan McCain. RAWR!
bloody spaniard
14 years ago
What pearls of wisdom are flowing out of her mouth NOW (shoulders slumped over & grimacing in anticipation w/wa wa sounding trombone music in background)?
](*,)

To think that I once liked this spunky, quick- witted woman... and then she was picked as McLame's running mate and she sold her soul to the devil.

IMVHO, if she ever runs for President on the Tea Party ticket, that'll be the end of of that party as a serious political voice.
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

What pearls of wisdom are flowing out of her mouth NOW (shoulders slumped over & grimacing in anticipation w/wa wa sounding trombone music in background)?
](*,)

To think that I once liked this spunky, quick- witted woman... and then she was picked as McLame's running mate and she sold her soul to the devil.

IMVHO, if she ever runs for President on the Tea Party ticket, that'll be the end of of that party as a serious political voice.

bloody spaniard wrote:




I don't think she's running for a damn thing. Too late for a mythical "Tea Party" bloc to post a candidate.

What Sarah has and will continue to do is sit on the sidelines and use her voice to back conservative ideas, candidates and goals. She's done well for herself in the last election cycle. Only one candidate she's stumped for didn't win the office they were seeking. That's pretty damn good.

I will forever be endeared to Palin for her stance on special needs children. She said she would be an advocate for them in the White House. They still don't have a voice. With all of the rampant cuts in budgets the 1st things to go are special needs programs.

People only see her for her good lucks and boobs and fail to acknowledge she was the only person out of the the last Presidential election that had any REAL Executive experience. Experience matters. You can't fake your way through this job and there isn't time for OJT like the Kenyan King has shown us. He's out of his element and is taking us down the wrong path at the wrong time. The recession...perhaps depression is a better term...has been lengthened by his own spending and policy. He's running out of money and wants another TRILLION. Please. WAKE UP.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

I don't think she's running for a damn thing. Too late for a mythical "Tea Party" bloc to post a candidate.

What Sarah has and will continue to do is sit on the sidelines and use her voice to back conservative ideas, candidates and goals. She's done well for herself in the last election cycle. Only one candidate she's stumped for didn't win the office they were seeking. That's pretty damn good.

I will forever be endeared to Palin for her stance on special needs children. She said she would be an advocate for them in the White House. They still don't have a voice. With all of the rampant cuts in budgets the 1st things to go are special needs programs.

People only see her for her good lucks and boobs and fail to acknowledge she was the only person out of the the last Presidential election that had any REAL Executive experience. Experience matters. You can't fake your way through this job and there isn't time for OJT like the Kenyan King has shown us. He's out of his element and is taking us down the wrong path at the wrong time. The recession...perhaps depression is a better term...has been lengthened by his own spending and policy. He's running out of money and wants another TRILLION. Please. WAKE UP.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Mythical tea party bloc, interesting. I think it exists, it's just not in any way significant anymore, but we agree it seems for the most part.

The Alaskan Barbie's stance on special needs children is fine, but she's hardly special for that. Look at all the work the Kennedys have done for 40 years on the issue.

"With all of the rampant cuts in budgets the 1st things to go are special needs programs."

This is an example of how conservatives don't want a 'smaller' government. They want a government that spends money on what they like, need or want.
wheelrite
14 years ago
The Silent Majority will speak loudly in 2012...
Bye Bye Barry,,,
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

The Silent Majority will speak loudly in 2012...
Bye Bye Barry,,,

wheelrite wrote:



lol, silent majority, moral majority, tea party. All the same thing. A minority of extremists.
wheelrite
14 years ago

lol, silent majority, moral majority, tea party. All the same thing. A minority of extremists.

FuzzNJ wrote:



Tomato, Tomahhhto
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

Mythical tea party bloc, interesting. I think it exists, it's just not in any way significant anymore, but we agree it seems for the most part.

The Alaskan Barbie's stance on special needs children is fine, but she's hardly special for that. Look at all the work the Kennedys have done for 40 years on the issue.

"With all of the rampant cuts in budgets the 1st things to go are special needs programs."

This is an example of how conservatives don't want a 'smaller' government. They want a government that spends money on what they like, need or want.

FuzzNJ wrote:




You misunderstood. There's no formal "Tea Party"...therefore there's no Tea Party candidate to vote for on the ballot. There are local candidates that are Tea Party backed and some Congress and Senate runs as well.

As far as the Kennedy's guilting into Special Olympics because Ol' Joe thought it best to lobotomize one of the clan...whatever. Keep on believing that they're really nice people and Camelot was a swell place.

Sarah understands what it's like from the trenches as well as I do just what goes into taking care of a child with special needs. There's other BOTL's that are in "The Club" too.

As far as "smaller government" I really wish you could visit your Utopian place and live there. It exists only in dreams and Sci-Fi novels. Government is the enemy. If it's powerful enough to rob you blind it's powerful enough to strip away from the people that can't fend for themselves. You're rudimentary understanding of Conversativism is limited to what you read at the DailyKos and the Huff. You're just like Rick with the blinders. There's no taking them off of both of you. Even when you're faced with irrefutable proof or evidence you deny it.
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

You misunderstood. There's no formal "Tea Party"...therefore there's no Tea Party candidate to vote for on the ballot. There are local candidates that are Tea Party backed and some Congress and Senate runs as well.

As far as the Kennedy's guilting into Special Olympics because Ol' Joe thought it best to lobotomize one of the clan...whatever. Keep on believing that they're really nice people and Camelot was a swell place.

Sarah understands what it's like from the trenches as well as I do just what goes into taking care of a child with special needs. There's other BOTL's that are in "The Club" too.

As far as "smaller government" I really wish you could visit your Utopian place and live there. It exists only in dreams and Sci-Fi novels. Government is the enemy. If it's powerful enough to rob you blind it's powerful enough to strip away from the people that can't fend for themselves. You're rudimentary understanding of Conversativism is limited to what you read at the DailyKos and the Huff. You're just like Rick with the blinders. There's no taking them off of both of you. Even when you're faced with irrefutable proof or evidence you deny it.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



I know there isn't a formal tea party, it's a block of voters from the republican party and has been since 2 days after the first time the tea party was on tv.

To go after the kennedy's for their work with the special needs is ludicrous. Before they started it was common to lobotomized, they helped change that.

Dude, smoke a joint and relax. Your irrational hatred is causing you to say irrational things.

wheelrite
14 years ago

I know there isn't a formal tea party, it's a block of voters from the republican party and has been since 2 days after the first time the tea party was on tv.

To go after the kennedy's for their work with the special needs is ludicrous. Before they started it was common to lobotomized, they helped change that.

Dude, smoke a joint and relax. Your irrational hatred is causing you to say irrational things.

FuzzNJ wrote:


um,
They had their sister Lobotomized and had her put away so the world could'nt see her.
That's very charitable,right ?#-o
DrMaddVibe
14 years ago

I know there isn't a formal tea party, it's a block of voters from the republican party and has been since 2 days after the first time the tea party was on tv.

To go after the kennedy's for their work with the special needs is ludicrous. Before they started it was common to lobotomized, they helped change that.

Dude, smoke a joint and relax. Your irrational hatred is causing you to say irrational things.

FuzzNJ wrote:




You're problem is that you're high. Sitting on the couch folding laundry.

Yeah, the Kennedy Klan and their "affiliation" to the Special Olympics is just a guilt offering. Nothing more. See it for what it really is. One week a year they fly out to wherever the host city is and say a few words. That's it...goodnight. For all the millions they've made off the backs of America...that's it.

Irrational? Facts really suck to you.
wheelrite
14 years ago

I know there isn't a formal tea party, it's a block of voters from the republican party and has been since 2 days after the first time the tea party was on tv.

To go after the kennedy's for their work with the special needs is ludicrous. Before they started it was common to lobotomized, they helped change that.

Dude, smoke a joint and relax. Your irrational hatred is causing you to say irrational things.

FuzzNJ wrote:



In 1949, about 5,000 lobotomies were performed in the U.S. Some estimates place the total number of lobotomies performed in the U.S. from the 1930s through the 1950s as high as 50,000.
Kennedy's sister Rosemary received one of Freeman's ice-pick lobotomies, resulting in a severe mental impairment that left her paralysed, incoherent, and incontinent. According to some accounts, Rosemary had suffered from a mild mental retardation, which the lobotomy was supposed to fix.


oopsey!!](*,)
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

In 1949, about 5,000 lobotomies were performed in the U.S. Some estimates place the total number of lobotomies performed in the U.S. from the 1930s through the 1950s as high as 50,000.
Kennedy's sister Rosemary received one of Freeman's ice-pick lobotomies, resulting in a severe mental impairment that left her paralysed, incoherent, and incontinent. According to some accounts, Rosemary had suffered from a mild mental retardation, which the lobotomy was supposed to fix.


oopsey!!](*,)

wheelrite wrote:




Oops? What did I say that was incorrect? I said lobotomies used to be done often, it was considered a medically sound treatment at the time. Medical technology and knowledge change. Someday we'll think radiation and chemo were barbaric. What happened after they went through that they is still started the special olympics and worked hard to change attitudes.

Irrational hatred is not admirable.
wheelrite
14 years ago

Oops? What did I say that was incorrect? I said lobotomies used to be done often, it was considered a medically sound treatment at the time. Medical technology and knowledge change. Someday we'll think radiation and chemo were barbaric. What happened after they went through that they is still started the special olympics and worked hard to change attitudes.

Irrational hatred is not admirable.

FuzzNJ wrote:



oh,,
The Kennedy doctrine,
DO as I say not as I do..

gotcha=d>
rfenst
14 years ago

You're problem is that you're high. Sitting on the couch folding laundry.

Yeah, the Kennedy Klan and their "affiliation" to the Special Olympics is just a guilt offering. Nothing more. See it for what it really is. One week a year they fly out to wherever the host city is and say a few words. That's it...goodnight. For all the millions they've made off the backs of America...that's it you.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



So you are of the opinion that the Kennedy's have responsibility to the rest of us relative "have nots"? LOL!!!





(Most seriously, as to the other matter, you must know that I beleive we all, through our governments, have a great responsibility to those with special needs. We are on the same page, albeit from very different perspectives.)
FuzzNJ
14 years ago

oh,,
The Kennedy doctrine,
DO as I say not as I do..

gotcha=d>

wheelrite wrote:



No. That is exemplified by your Catholicism.
bloody spaniard
14 years ago


...What Sarah has and will continue to do is sit on the sidelines and use her voice to back conservative ideas, candidates and goals. She's done well for herself in the last election cycle. Only one candidate she's stumped for didn't win the office they were seeking. That's pretty damn good.

I will forever be endeared to Palin for her stance on special needs children. She said she would be an advocate for them in the White House. They still don't have a voice. With all of the rampant cuts in budgets the 1st things to go are special needs programs.

People only see her for her good lucks and boobs and fail to acknowledge she was the only person out of the the last Presidential election that had any REAL Executive experience. Experience matters. You can't fake your way through this job and there isn't time for OJT like the Kenyan King has shown us. He's out of his element and is taking us down the wrong path at the wrong time. The recession...perhaps depression is a better term...has been lengthened by his own spending and policy. He's running out of money and wants another TRILLION. Please. WAKE UP.

DrMaddVibe wrote:




Without a doubt, she is a VERY capable politician and has much more hands-on experience than Obama. No doubt about that, Doc. Problem is her message sounds tediously repetitious & one dimensional to me after a while, especially after she lugs (and defends) the McLame baggage. This tarnishes her credibility IMO. There are other interesting & less partisan "talking heads" out there such as ****** Morris & even Pat Buchanan.

Yes, her stance on special need kids is what initially endeared her to me. I wasn't aware that she was still an advocate for the cause though.

And finally, yes, I agree that Obama has been an unmitigated disaster. It's a bit more complicated than just his spending policies but it's obvious that he's in waaaaay over his head despite being surrounded by experienced advisers. It appears that even though he wants the playing field leveled for the little guy, he doesn't like nor understand capitalism much. Which is ironic because his predecessor claimed to love the free market despite his failures as a businessman, so perhaps that's why he made sure that the small businessman got screwed while he helped the corporate folk. Perhaps a little payback in his eyes... LOL
rfenst
14 years ago

No. That is exemplified by your Catholicism.

FuzzNJ wrote:



Low blow.
Users browsing this topic