dubleuhb
14 years ago

If one pays attention to current events and news, LGBT should come as nothing new, regardless of how they feel about matters. Google also works really well. Beyond that not knowing what LGBT means is likely ignorance.

rfenst wrote:


Ignorance ? Really? I don't watch the crap on TV, when reading I pass over the lifestyles section. When it comes to current events why would I pay attention to something like this ? I don't care what others do, just don't push your weird, unconventional, sick lifestyle on me thinking it is normal. Why would I bother to Google this ? It is of no interest and nothing would ever compel me to learn more about that freak show.

Amazing what some have give normalcy to these days. Sodom and Gomorrah he we come.
tailgater
14 years ago

If one pays attention to current events and news, LGBT should come as nothing new, regardless of how they feel about matters. Google also works really well. Beyond that not knowing what LGBT means is likely ignorance.

rfenst wrote:




You start by qualifying your statement with "If one pays attention to current events...". You're basically saying that you either know this, or you don't pay attention. Pretty lame way to start a discussion.

You then suggest "google", but you finish by admitting that if you actually need to use Google then you are likely ignorant.

Why the hell would you disparage someone simply because they don't recognize an acronym?



tailgater
14 years ago

Limbaugh is a drug addict hypocrite that's been married what, four times? What's shameful is that so many of you wouldn't know what side of an issue to take if he didn't tell you.

Big Sexy wrote:



Awesome first post!

So I guess it's OK for someone to be part of the LGBTQ crowd, but not divorced? Or to have an addiction?

The only thing you're proving with your first post is that you need Rush and his ilk to tell YOU which side of an issue to take.
Sure, it's the opposite position, but is that really any different?

Is it?




Is it?

[whip]
kharzhak
14 years ago
I don't know why y'all are against this ... first we pay for contraception for the ladies ... soon we'll have them paying for mistresses (w/ contraception) for the men ... that's how it's going to work out ... just wait.
Rclay
14 years ago
Who is going to pay for rfenst's Love Bot 5000? Clearly someone should, and not him. Robot love should be covered with tax dollars!
rfenst
14 years ago

THIS IS GONNA HURT.. SO SORRY ROBT.

THE FRIGGIN PROBLEM IS MOST OF THESE ELECTED GONADS ARE ATTORNIES !!

jackconrad wrote:




I don't think it is the fact that they are attorneys that is the problem. It is their constituents and parties which are the problem. Their constituents elect and retain them. Their party allegiances prevent independent thinking and action accomplishing their most important duties. But, I do appreciate your effort to drag me into your discussion and make me guilty by association.
wheelrite
14 years ago
all this is just Eugenics in a foil wrapper . Ribbed for her pleasure..


wheel,
Rclay
rfenst
14 years ago

Ignorance ? Really? I don't watch the crap on TV, when reading I pass over the lifestyles section. When it comes to current events why would I pay attention to something like this ? I don't care what others do, just don't push your weird, unconventional, sick lifestyle on me thinking it is normal. Why would I bother to Google this ? It is of no interest and nothing would ever compel me to learn more about that freak show.

Amazing what some have give normalcy to these days. Sodom and Gomorrah he we come.

dubleuhb wrote:




ignorant ig·no·rant/ˈignərənt/

Adjective: Lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about something in particular.



Let me make absolutely certain that I am clear. If one does not know, for example, what the acronym LGBT stands for and doesn't bother to look it up on Google (or elsewhere) when they come across it and wonder what it means, I believe they are ignorant.
rfenst
14 years ago

Who is going to pay for rfenst's Love Bot 5000? Clearly someone should, and not him. Robot love should be covered with tax dollars!

Rclay wrote:



WTF do you mean?
ZRX1200
14 years ago
Don't worry about it. Your copay is covered by your tithe at the First Church of Apliantology.
ZRX1200
14 years ago
Don't worry about it. Your copay is covered by your tithe at the First Church of Apliantology.
Rclay
14 years ago
Obsurdity to point out Obsurdity


dubleuhb
14 years ago

ignorant ig·no·rant/ˈignərənt/

Adjective: Lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about something in particular.



Let me make absolutely certain that I am clear. If one does not know, for example, what the acronym LGBT stands for and doesn't bother to look it up on Google (or elsewhere) when they come across it and wonder what it means, I believe they are ignorant.

rfenst wrote:




gnorant - uneducated in general; lacking knowledge or sophistication; "an ignorant man"; "nescient of contemporary literature"; "an unlearned group incapable of understanding complex issues"; "exhibiting contempt for his unlettered companions"
nescient, unlettered, unlearned
uneducated - not having a good education
2. ignorant - uneducated in the fundamentals of a given art or branch of learning; lacking knowledge of a specific field; "she is ignorant of quantum mechanics"; "he is musically illiterate"
illiterate
uneducated - not having a good education
3. ignorant - unaware because of a lack of relevant information or knowledge; "he was completely ignorant of the circumstances"; "an unknowledgeable assistant"; "his rudeness was unwitting"
unknowing, unknowledgeable, unwitting
uninformed - not informed; lacking in knowledge or information; "the uninformed public"

Well then touche, as I have no need to know what it means as it is irrelevant in my life your ignorance falls under meaning 3.
The assumption that I care enough about lesbians, gays, bi-sexual, transgender.. or is it transvestite, still not sure on the Q though, to Google an acronym for it. You obviously were ignorant of that fact.

I would say that in your line of work it is imperative to keep up with this kind of thing, but I choose to keep myself ignorant then as it has no place in my life or those I choose to interact with. Say what you will but I have my convictions and stand by them.
A little side note, I am not alone on this. They just had to install a third bathroom in many state buildings here at taxpayers expense due to the fact men and women were uncomfortable with those in transition coming into whoever's restroom. These transitions or what ever they are called are also payed for by the taxpayer. Once again a few freeks running the system a muck.
dubleuhb
14 years ago

Who is going to pay for rfenst's Love Bot 5000? Clearly someone should, and not him. Robot love should be covered with tax dollars!

Rclay wrote:


I think there is an app for that.
kharzhak
14 years ago

Who is going to pay for rfenst's Love Bot 5000? Clearly someone should, and not him. Robot love should be covered with tax dollars!

Rclay wrote:



Obama will!! Vote for Obama in 2012 for free Love Bot's! I can see the bumper stickers!!
Rclay
14 years ago
Public funding for Pickle Parks!
dubleuhb
14 years ago
Double standard outrage!!
tailgater
14 years ago

ignorant ig·no·rant/ˈignərənt/

Adjective: Lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about something in particular.



Let me make absolutely certain that I am clear. If one does not know, for example, what the acronym LGBT stands for and doesn't bother to look it up on Google (or elsewhere) when they come across it and wonder what it means, I believe they are ignorant.

rfenst wrote:



I don't think that's a fair assessment.
One can "wonder what it means" without really caring enough to google it.
Further, I think during the course of a conversation, it's perfectly fine to wonder "out loud" at a silly acronym that is added to a story without the author defining it.

It is common practice, and good judgement, for an author to define terms that are generally considered uncommon.

Just my opinion.
Your mileage may vary.



Users browsing this topic