DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

Gotta admit what was once white supremecy speak has become more mainstream.

teedubbya wrote:




I dunno...YouTube some of Sen. Byrd's Meet The Press doo doo steppin and git back to me!
bloody spaniard
13 years ago
Damn, some of you guys can talk some smack.
Prolly majored in philosophy.

I know what traditional marriage means to me & it doesn't involve nuptials between two men a pineapple and the ****zu. You want to rewrite laws passed down through millenia (that's thousands of annus, er years btw) to accommodate your current flavor of the month religion, that's your problem. Take it up with your horse whisperer.

Best you queer activists fight for familial (or "partner) rights instead- more practical & less looney- like "hubby's" employer health insurance coverage, visitation/property rights, etc. Come to think of it this should apply to actual sisters, brothers, or other family members living together under the same roof as well.
DrafterX
13 years ago
πŸ€” πŸ€”
so, when people say they want to see more Nip in the picture post they mean more Japs..?? πŸ˜•
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel supported Moreno, saying, β€œChick-fil-A values are not Chicago values.”

DrafterX wrote:





There goes the neighborhood!](*,)


bloody spaniard
13 years ago
😟

:-k πŸ€”
so, when people say they wan to see more Nip in the picture post they mean more Japs..?? πŸ˜•

DrafterX wrote:




Don't EVER let Victor or anyone else call you stupid again.
You're as smaht (if not more) than anyone else here.8-[
teedubbya
13 years ago

:-k πŸ€”
so, when people say they wan to see more Nip in the picture post they mean more Japs..?? πŸ˜•

DrafterX wrote:



yes.

and blood is for that muslim shakira law thing because it has been around a long time. oh wait.... that's not HIS religion.... it doesn't count.

so sowwy
bloody spaniard
13 years ago

yes.
and blood is for that muslim shakira law thing because it has been around a long time. oh wait.... that's not HIS religion.... it doesn't count.
so sowwy

teedubbya wrote:





You want to marry a walking pup tent & have your pipi wackin' hand cut off, go ahead & dance to the shakira.
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago
LAMBADA OUTRAGE!!!
teedubbya
13 years ago
I live by shakira law... my hips DON'T lie. you should know that after our visit.
DrafterX
13 years ago
Shakira's hot... saw her boobs once... πŸ‘
teedubbya
13 years ago

Shakira's hot... saw her boobs once... πŸ‘

DrafterX wrote:



I suspect what you saw was the shadow of your own boobs.
victor809
13 years ago

Damn, some of you guys can talk some smack.
Prolly majored in philosophy.

I know what traditional marriage means to me & it doesn't involve nuptials between two men a pineapple and the ****zu. You want to rewrite laws passed down through millenia (that's thousands of annus, er years btw) to accommodate your current flavor of the month religion, that's your problem. Take it up with your horse whisperer.

bloody spaniard wrote:



Congrats bloody... you've managed to imply there is no difference between two legal, self sufficient adults and fruit and/or animals.

Reducto ad absurdum at it's best.... (and no, that's not a harry potter spell drafter)
teedubbya
13 years ago
I wonder if the Preist's hips lied?
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

I suspect what you saw was the shadow of your own boobs.

teedubbya wrote:




TIT DIRT!
bloody spaniard
13 years ago
Victor, I'm just saying, don't waste time making it up as you go along. Give 'em something practical that they can sink their teeth into besides alimony. Reread my post w/o moving your lips this time.


I live by shakira law... my hips DON'T lie. you should know that after our visit.

teedubbya wrote:



Something very disturbing about that image... will need mucho heroin to erase...😨
bloody spaniard
13 years ago
They, meaning homosexuals (along with non-married family members), should have access to their loved one's health coverage, hospital visitations, property rights yada yada yada.
victor809
13 years ago
I've been saying for years that the legal recognition of marriage should simply be abolished. It would solve a ridiculous number of problems.

Simply put, if EVERYONE (man:woman, man:man, woman:woman) was legally represented by a "civil union", then everyone is equal.

Get married in your church, choose a church that doesn't recognize anyone you don't want it to recognize so that your own special marriage is special in whatever way you want it to be.

You already have to file for marriage licenses anyway, so there wouldn't be any additional steps.

Problems like this are what arise when we allow religion and law to intersect.
tailgater
13 years ago

Of course the quip implies it. It was meant to. :)

Here you're making an assumption. You can only speak from your view point (and honestly, I can only know for sure what's going on in my brilliant and sexy head), yet you're going to say that the majority of individuals trying to block same sex marriage are simply tired of the perpetually advancing agenda. You don't know what's in their head (and neither do I), you only know what they are willing to admit to publicly.

A lot of hate groups (of any type) will have a very similar public face. So while from your perspective (as someone who I actually do believe doesn't really have a problem with gays) it seems possible that they may just want to get along, there isn't any differentiation in their statements, so someone who has a more vested interest (such as Sammy) may not be willing to risk it.

victor809 wrote:



Regardless of your self appointed detail to educate the CBid masses regarding GLBT equality, and ignoring the humor rooted in bigotry throughout this thread, do you honestly feel that most who oppose gay marriage do so out of hatred towards same sex couples?

I believe that when push comes to shove, most people wouldn't care if someone is gay. But to expect them to therefore accept a "new" definition of marriage is sometimes asking a lot for a group of people who otherwise wouldn't care to even think about it too long.

Face it: for as long as anyone in this country has lived or can remember, marriage has always meant a legal union between one man and one woman.
Maybe it wasn't defined like this by Webster. And maybe congress never made sure to include it between the pages of one of our laws.
But that is absolutely what it meant.

Now you've got a movement. Gay people are standing proud. They're speaking up. Coming out. No apologies. They have their own magazines and television shows and movies. They're being recognized by liberals and by conservative America. People that have gone their entire lives without thinking about two gay guys watch Will and Grace and think that the Jack Character is hysterical.
The Bird Cage was the funniest movie in years.

But now they're being told to simply accpet any and all change. And when they hesitate they're labeled a bigot. When they explain themselves they're accused of hate.

And so it grows into something it shouldn't be.
And both sides are feeding into it.

teedubbya
13 years ago
many\most who oppose gay marriage are homophobes to some degree. If you feel the need for empirical proof good on you. Thats a pretty common shell to hide behind. proving it one way or another really doesn't accomplish much anyway. it just is.

DrMaddVibe
13 years ago
Well, that depends on what your definition of is...is[whip]
Users browsing this topic