Brewha
13 years ago
Well I guess we can all be grateful that we finally have healthcare reform underway.
:-k


So we do need laws to protect us from these vile teachers screwing over the tax payers – wow. I am surprised at the vilification of the educators. I never thought of them as getting ‘rich’ off of us. And I gather that you all don’t think there compensation is fair market value.

Any chance we could admire their financial success in the education business? No, they are unfair and shameless.

They should follow the example of Halliburton – they would never screw the tax payer.
JKilburn
13 years ago
Gonna tell my wife we need to move to these states that overpay teachers unlike here in Indiana. Each year we have to lower our insurance so we can afford it. We're on the lowest one now and with her being paid bi-weekly, insurance plus dental/vision is almost half her paycheck. Yes, I am still grateful that she has a job though.
frankj1
13 years ago

Well I guess we can all be grateful that we finally have healthcare reform underway.
:-k


So we do need laws to protect us from these vile teachers screwing over the tax payers – wow. I am surprised at the vilification of the educators. I never thought of them as getting ‘rich’ off of us. And I gather that you all don’t think there compensation is fair market value.

Any chance we could admire their financial success in the education business? No, they are unfair and shameless.

They should follow the example of Halliburton – they would never screw the tax payer.

Brewha wrote:


Walker was simply trying to cut pay, the rest is, well, um, debatable...

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2011/02/25/the-wisconsin-lie-exposed-taxpayers-actually-contribute-nothing-to-public-employee-pensions/ 

I have no connection to Wisc and but this link was sent to me by a private school employee friend from PA during the Wisc stuff and that's what I referenced earlier in this thread. If true (again, I am not involved but I detest pig piles based on intentional inflammatory info by any side) then even folks here from Wisc have been hoodwinked by their Governor.
Mrs.Tank
13 years ago
I've endured paycuts, and a suspension of any 401k contributions by my employer - just to keep my job. Our company actually had to stop offering insurance because the rates have gone up so much. Yet these unions think that raising our taxes to pay for their 100% funded pension plans and their premium health care is the only option. If the teachers had selected a different insurance program, they would have saved $$$. But that is the union run insurance they have, so I guess that was not an option.

frankj1
13 years ago

I've endured paycuts, and a suspension of any 401k contributions by my employer - just to keep my job. Our company actually had to stop offering insurance because the rates have gone up so much. Yet these unions think that raising our taxes to pay for their 100% funded pension plans and their premium health care is the only option. If the teachers had selected a different insurance program, they would have saved $$$. But that is the union run insurance they have, so I guess that was not an option.

Mrs.Tank wrote:


I just reread the link I provided. You seem to have been given incorrect info about their benefits. Union members used deferred portions of their existing pay to fund all of it. You have not been paying for it with your tax money.* The cause of shortfalls lies with your elected officials, not the workers, who did not properly follow guidlines set up by their own actuaries.

I too have had paycuts (one a whopping 8% four years ago) and loss of matching 401K contributions from my boss, but I try not to allow my anger to be manipulated by lying politicians no matter their goals. Hating scapegoats is a dangerous game.

* though tax money pays the salaries of all State employees, including the Gov.
Brewha
13 years ago
We don’t have unions in my line of work – but we do get the pay cut, 401k, insurance reduction screwing too. And our execs got the most delightful bonuses.

The sort of misinformation and hate mongering I see is a genuinely effective tool – divide and conquer. WE should all gang up on the evil teachers – they are misanthropes (that means bad people for those who did not have a teacher).

Sound like some of us might be better off in a union (Mrs.T)?

Ever think that the real villain here might not be the slave next to you that didn’t get their rations cut?
Mathen
13 years ago
I have worked in the field of education, both primary and secondary. Support staff, not a teacher. My mother has been a teacher, and I have an aunt and a cousin who are both currently teachers. So I have a little bit of knowledge of "the system".

Truth: the wage for a starting teacher is terrible
Truth: there are, in fact, some great teachers out there. People who earnestly endeavor to teach and enrich the lives of children.

Here's some other truths: around here, teachers are under contract to work 185 days a year. There are 365 days on the calendar that means they work almost exactly one day out of every two. That's a part time job.

Teachers get a mandated student-free "planning period" every day. Do you get an hour a day, every day, that doesn't involve your primary job duty? I don't.

When I worked for the local school district-- and I know this is not the same everywhere-- it made 8% contributions into the retirement system. It also paid 100% of health insurance costs on the emoloyee. That did change while I was working there and they were asked to pay something like $18 dollars a month. There was an uproar like you wouldn't believe. Also, if you were insuring your family, you had to contribute as well. I say this to be fair, because some people (myself included) did contribute but at a pretty favorable rate. Retirement (which you can start collecting at 55 until you die) and the employee insurance was paid for by the tax payer.

There were guaranteed raises every year based on nothing but how long you have been there. I personally know a middle school gym teacher that makes $90k a year. Yes, she's been teaching there since 1973 but think about that: $90k a year for a part time job that involves blowing a whistle and throwing a ball out except for the six weeks a year you are required to teach health. Plus she gets extra money for coaching sports teams. Do you think she's home at night grading papers on her own time? Buying school supplies out of pocket? Nope!

Observation and opinion: many *many* (though by no means all) of the teachers I had direct contact with we're lazy, marginally competent at best, and didn't give a hoot about the kids. They were all constantly lobbying to get more for themselves for less effort. Want to see an elementary teacher have a melt down? Tell her due to lack of staff that Agee needs to watch kids get on te bus in the afternoon before she goes home. I watched an absolute temper tantrum happen over that. Her exact words: "I won't get home until four o'clock if I have to do that!". Class starts at eight thirty five so it wasn't like she had been there since five am.

I could go on and on about the entitlement, aggregious and outrageous behavior I have personally seen, but I know that it's not going to change anybody's minds. I will say this: I have a whole hell of a lot less respect for "educators" after having spent a few years around them.
ZRX1200
13 years ago
A little melodramatic today I see.

I don't think you're taking the opposing opinions (that's the people who don't agree with you) in the right light. This is typical for the pro union argument with public employees, how can you dislike a teacher or policeman or firefighter? The problem is the unions and the way the bargaining is done.
drywalldog
13 years ago
Republicans were trying to put the knife thro the heart of unions. This had nothing to do with bad contracts. The unions were willing to negotiate over the pensions and raises. Walker, wouldnt. Be interesting to see if this comes back to bite him.
ZRX1200
13 years ago
"Negotiate" means do enough to not loose public support then strike when cuts actually start happening. And strike during the school year not the summer because IT'S ALL ABOUT THE KIDS!!!!

complete bullscheet.
Brewha
13 years ago

A little melodramatic today I see.

I don't think you're taking the opposing opinions (that's the people who don't agree with you) in the right light. This is typical for the pro union argument with public employees, how can you dislike a teacher or policeman or firefighter? The problem is the unions and the way the bargaining is done.

ZRX1200 wrote:


Curses – you have seen though thinly veiled plan . . . . .




Spot on as always.
Agreed it is a bargaining issue. My ax to grind is with laws that take away one’s right to bargain. Laws like this seem to chip away at our freedom. And the chips never seem to get put back (?).

And just to clear my already questionable name – I was not the first cast member in the melodrama.
ZRX1200
13 years ago
I know. And I hope you know you annoy me at times but I'd smoke with ya anytime and buy
you a beer.

You're fun to chew the cud with.

Mrs.Tank
13 years ago
I am not anti union. I only hope that reasonable considerations considering today's economy can be made. Instead of switching to a cheaper insurance, the union chose instead to have teachers laid off. Sounds like the union is working for their members - ALL of their members.

rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
13 years ago
Both sides take risks. The employer risks the strike lasting so long that even if it were to accede to the employee demands, it becomes a losing proposition. The employees risk losing their jobs like the air traffic controllers did years ago.
JKilburn
13 years ago

I have worked in the field of education, both primary and secondary. Support staff, not a teacher. My mother has been a teacher, and I have an aunt and a cousin who are both currently teachers. So I have a little bit of knowledge of "the system".

Truth: the wage for a starting teacher is terrible
Truth: there are, in fact, some great teachers out there. People who earnestly endeavor to teach and enrich the lives of children.

Here's some other truths: around here, teachers are under contract to work 185 days a year. There are 365 days on the calendar that means they work almost exactly one day out of every two. That's a part time job.

Teachers get a mandated student-free "planning period" every day. Do you get an hour a day, every day, that doesn't involve your primary job duty? I don't.
When I worked for the local school district-- and I know this is not the same everywhere-- it made 8% contributions into the retirement system. It also paid 100% of health insurance costs on the emoloyee. That did change while I was working there and they were asked to pay something like $18 dollars a month. There was an uproar like you wouldn't believe. Also, if you were insuring your family, you had to contribute as well. I say this to be fair, because some people (myself included) did contribute but at a pretty favorable rate. Retirement (which you can start collecting at 55 until you die) and the employee insurance was paid for by the tax payer.

There were guaranteed raises every year based on nothing but how long you have been there. I personally know a middle school gym teacher that makes $90k a year. Yes, she's been teaching there since 1973 but think about that: $90k a year for a part time job that involves blowing a whistle and throwing a ball out except for the six weeks a year you are required to teach health. Plus she gets extra money for coaching sports teams. Do you think she's home at night grading papers on her own time? Buying school supplies out of pocket? Nope!

Observation and opinion: many *many* (though by no means all) of the teachers I had direct contact with we're lazy, marginally competent at best, and didn't give a hoot about the kids. They were all constantly lobbying to get more for themselves for less effort. Want to see an elementary teacher have a melt down? Tell her due to lack of staff that Agee needs to watch kids get on te bus in the afternoon before she goes home. I watched an absolute temper tantrum happen over that. Her exact words: "I won't get home until four o'clock if I have to do that!". Class starts at eight thirty five so it wasn't like she had been there since five am.

I could go on and on about the entitlement, aggregious and outrageous behavior I have personally seen, but I know that it's not going to change anybody's minds. I will say this: I have a whole hell of a lot less respect for "educators" after having spent a few years around them.

Mathen wrote:



That's the part that always get's me. I have never met a teacher that only puts in their 185 days. I know you're just telling what you have seen and are not attacking. My wife and most of my friends teach. They must be a rarity in this profession. 1 hour time off spent with students or doesn't exist, teaching summer school, always prepping for the next year, paying for continuing education(which is required unlike most professions), and paying for school supplies out of pocket. 5 day work week is a myth. Most spend Sunday at school getting ready for the upcoming week. All said and done they work just as hard and long as any other job. I realize this was a thread about unions, sorry for getting off topic.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
13 years ago
Why is there criticism of self-insured union health insurance. when employer self-insured health insurance very common
pdxstogieman
13 years ago

Why is there criticism of self-insured union health insurance. when employer self-insured health insurance very common

rfenst wrote:



Because many people here believe the very concept of a union is evil, therefore facts and logic don't apply.
dubleuhb
13 years ago

Why is there criticism of self-insured union health insurance. when employer self-insured health insurance very common

rfenst wrote:


When it comes to public sector unions they are not self insured. They manage the insurance paid for by the taxpayer and refuse to do what jane and joe public have had to endure, ei; pay more out of pocket and be a bit more frugal with the peoples money. It's not their money so why care, just give me more attitude that has people annoyed.
dubleuhb
13 years ago

Because many people here believe the very concept of a union is evil, therefore facts and logic don't apply.

pdxstogieman wrote:


I work in a union shop and I am the only one who refuses to pay dues, my choice and not an easy thing to endure at times. Private sector but the union acts as though they pay me and the only reason there is a company is them. I have a good laugh every time pointing out the fact they don't sign my check and work for xxxxxxx, needless to say a few of the koolaide drinkers dislike me. 🍺
Mathen
13 years ago

That's the part that always get's me. I have never met a teacher that only puts in their 185 days. I know you're just telling what you have seen and are not attacking. My wife and most of my friends teach. They must be a rarity in this profession. 1 hour time off spent with students or doesn't exist, teaching summer school, always prepping for the next year, paying for continuing education(which is required unlike most professions), and paying for school supplies out of pocket. 5 day work week is a myth. Most spend Sunday at school getting ready for the upcoming week. All said and done they work just as hard and long as any other job. I realize this was a thread about unions, sorry for getting off topic.

JKilburn wrote:



Checked my time system at work for 2011. It's a shame I can't cut and paste all the formatting into this forum. I'll hit the big highlight:

Billed Hours Metrics FYTD as of 12/31/2011
Avg Work Week: 62.34

That's what I actually bother to put in my time card. 311 total days where I booked time. Most of the time I didn't actually put in the hour to three hours I work every single Sunday, though some days I did. I also closed the year maxed out on vacation days so I just stopped earning them. Didn't get them paid out or anything, just stopped accumulating new ones. My wife has forced me to take a few days off this year (6 total, 2 days at a time) so I won't be maxed out again until next month. All told though I've lost about 15 days vacation that I'll never get or get paid for with this employer.

This morning, I got up at two a.m. to work on some stuff that's due today so I wouldn't spend the entire weekend working and ignoring my family. That's why this post will hit a little after five a.m. when I hit submit. I've already been up for three hours and I'll get home at about 7:30 tonight. Maybe eight.

So, I've never met a teacher that works an average of 60 hours a week 52 weeks a year. Have you? I'm actually down too. In 2006 I billed as many as 117 hours some weeks. Never once less than 70.

I'm honestly not trying to attack anyone, and there are things about teaching that I have observed that absolutely suck. Pay for one, terrible parents, a*hole kids, and you know what? I can go pee anytime I want. You can't do that in the class room. I get it.

But I don't buy the whole "woe is me" story that the teacher's union wants you believe. I've spent plenty of Sunday's in schools when I worked there. Why? Because I ran the network and you spend all the instructional time playing help desk and have to do real work (installs, upgrades, etc.) when kids weren't in class. I have never seen a school over run with teachers on a Sunday. Never. Not once. A couple here and there? Sure.

I have had principals really really pissed off because they needed to unlock the door on an empty school to let me in or come back to lock up when I leave. The school district I worked for required teachers to work 3 days after school let out for the summer and 10 days before it opened back up. Otherwise all you had there was the principal and the secretary all summer long.

I could go on and on. And I could even do it with examples of wonderful teachers that I saw go out of their way to do something special for a kid. Unfortunately, there are far fewer examples of that then there are of me watching bitter, whiny, do-nothings be bitter and whiny while they did nothing.

I say in all seriousness and without any intention of being dramatic, it would take threat of jail or starvation for my family for me to take another job in a school district. When I left there the reason for leaving I put on my exit interview was "The culture of mediocrity that I can no longer endure."

True story.


Edit: Let me come back and say (because I know I sound like a ranting lunatic) that I think it's the system that is broken, not the individuals who are part of it. I think the union(s) exploit a lot of public sympathy with some pretty tenuous claims of hardship for teachers. And I have also seen the classroom burn a lot of people out. So what do you end up with? Good teachers who teach because they love it and are forced to work in a system that sucks, and terrible teachers who buy into the union message of suffering and endeavor to constantly ask the tax payer to fund more with the basic justification being "But I'm a TEACHER! I deserve it!" There's not a lot of middle ground that I've observed.
Users browsing this topic