frankj1
13 years ago
crazy call on the TD, and even worse was the not-called offensive pass interference by Tate before the ball came down. Nothing after should have even mattered.
Guido099
13 years ago
True. The interception/TD should have been a non issue.
fishinguitarman
13 years ago

[-x 😳

the Film is always at 11.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:











10:00 here
rumraider
13 years ago
Been hearing estimates of between 150 - 250 million dollars bet on the game last night. I wonder if gamblers have already started factoring in the ref situation. Also wondering if they're attempting/succeeding at bribing them.
wheelrite
13 years ago

Been hearing estimates of between 150 - 250 million dollars bet on the game last night. I wonder if gamblers have already started factoring in the ref situation. Also wondering if they're attempting/succeeding at bribing them.

rumraider wrote:



what do you think ?
DrafterX
13 years ago

Been hearing estimates of between 150 - 250 million dollars bet on the game last night. I wonder if gamblers have already started factoring in the ref situation. Also wondering if they're attempting/succeeding at bribing them.

rumraider wrote:

l



NFL repacement referees could alter Vegas point spreads Published September 20, 2012

Football fans can continue to debate about whether replacement referees are having an effect on NFL games, but no less an authority than the oddsmakers of Las Vegas believes the inexperienced zebras are responsible for higher scores.

Oddsmakers told The Associated Press that casinos are considering tinkering with their point spreads as interim referees, some of whom were pulled from the small college ranks, take over the officiating on Sundays. No actual adjustments have been made yet after two weeks of gridiron action, but oddsmaker Mike Colbert of Cantor Gaming said home teams could deserve an extra half-point boost. Hosts are getting 55.1 percent of penalties called in their favor, up from 54.8 percent last year. Such little things can make a difference in what's been called a game of inches.

"When you're taking hundreds of thousands of dollars per game, those half-points are really meaningful." - R.J. Bell, Pregame.com

"When you're taking hundreds of thousands of dollars per game, those half-points are really meaningful," gambling expert R.J. Bell of Pregame.com told the AP.

Oddsmakers try to set a line so roughly equal amounts are bet on both sides, with bookies making their money off the "vig," a flat fee taken off the top. But with inexperienced referees filling in while the veteran officials are locked out amid a labor dispute, setting a line has become even more complicated than usual.

"It's starting to concern us a bit," Colbert told the AP. "(Officials) should have no influence on the total or the side."

The replacement referees have been criticized for taking too long to review disputed plays, spotting the ball inaccurately and missing common penalties such as holding. Critics have also suggested that less-than-seasoned refs could lead to injuries. But the NFL has said they replacement referees will improve as the season continues if the labor dispute is not solved.

Casinos expect an average of 46.1 points scored per game for Week 3 — the highest projected total ever for Vegas casinos, Bell said. He said there really is no other variable that could explain it other than the new referees.

The NFL employs 121 fulltime referees, who reportedly make an average of $149,000 a year for their Sunday afternoon services. Most have other full-time jobs. The two main stumbling blocks in the labor dispute are retirement benefits and the NFL team owners' desire to impose new accountability standards on the referees.

On the retirement, issue, refs currently have a guaranteed pension that the owners would like to convert to a market-vulnerable 401(k) plan. The owners are seeking new accountability by gaining the ability to pull poorly-performing refs and replace them from what would be a new pool of backup referees. Although this would expand the number of referee jobs, the officials are against it.

Film at 11....
engletl
13 years ago
I see the deer right there!
rumraider
13 years ago
nope, that was the "packers suck" thread.
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

Been hearing estimates of between 150 - 250 million dollars bet on the game last night. I wonder if gamblers have already started factoring in the ref situation. Also wondering if they're attempting/succeeding at bribing them.

rumraider wrote:




What in the world would ever lead you to ask such a question?[gonzo]
Guido099
13 years ago

Yep

Abrignac wrote:


I didn't see a pic on that thread that showed GB clearly had the ball 🤔
BuckyB93
13 years ago
This the the quality of guys the NFL is using? WTF?

"He wasn't deemed good enough to become a Division I college official this summer, according to Karl Richins and his staff of Division I college officials at Stars and Stripes Academy for Football Officials in Salt Lake City."

"Richins said the biggest mistake Easley made was agreeing to become a replacement official in the first place. He said Easley had never officiated at a level higher than Division III and never voiced a desire to reach the NFL."


http://www.usatoday.com/sports/nfl/story/2012/09/25/replacement-ref-who-called-td-wasnt-ready-for-div-i-tutor-says/57842200/1 
DrafterX
13 years ago
I bet all these refs are related or went to high school together or somethin.... 😟
daveincincy
13 years ago
I thought it was funny how the ref who signaled TD with his arms looked over at the other ref prior to giving the "TD." It was like he was looking over at the other ref to see what he was going to do, and when the other refs arms started moving, the ref who signaled TD started putting his arms up in the air, probably thinking the other ref was going to do the same...but he didn't. Too late to take it back at that point I guess.

Maybe that's just the way I saw it. 🤔
DrafterX
13 years ago
I heard Vegas payed him to signal touchdown..... 😟
bobsnook
13 years ago
the pack will be back that's a fact
BrewCityRider
13 years ago
OK so the on field refs totally blew the call...I wasn't concerned because it is an automatic video review in the booth. Couldn't believe my eyes and ears when that idiot ref came back after review and announced that the call on the field stands. WTF is wrong with these people? Worst call ever. C'mon NFL, you HAVE to fix this. And what about that bogus roughing the passer call on the interception??? Are you friggin' kidding me? Not even close to roughing! UGH!!!
DrafterX
13 years ago
Ya... if only the NFL and the refs could cut a deal... it would be really cool to see the real refs tonite.... 😟
bloody spaniard
13 years ago

Ya... if only the NFL and the refs could cut a deal... it would be really cool to see the real refs tonite.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



[-o<

We can only hope. Things like this give me sleepless nights.
smokestaxx
13 years ago
aren't the real refs back now?
Users browsing this topic