Bullsheet.

ZRX1200 wrote:

A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obama.

jetblasted wrote:

Mitt, I'll go down swinging for you & Ryan in November, my friend.
Then (deleted original post) I'll fingerpoint at folks who enabled Obama/Biden's victory. [frypan]

bloody spaniard wrote:

Not sure like is the word I would use for Romney...I do like Ryan.

But, he is a better choice than the current amateur-in-chief.

TimFusco wrote:

Like, no. Voting for, yes.

edin508 wrote:

A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obama.

jetblasted wrote:

mother of mercy 🙏


is this the end of Rico?




Bring on the Persians![ram27bat] (I may have lost my mind but I'm still standing with the 300)

bloody spaniard wrote:

Bullsheet.

ZRX1200 wrote:

A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obama.

jetblasted wrote:

That and a tragic waste of time.

dubleuhb wrote:

Continuing to vote for the same clowns in different makeup is a tragic waste of time. Voting against the status quo is never a waste.

borndead1 wrote:

Until someone viable is presented what is the point ? You go cast your vote, he finishes last no matter who wins and you have a free pass to bitch about anything and everything.

Have fun with that.

dubleuhb wrote:

When was the last time a 3rd party candidate was allowed in the debates? 1992?

You go cast YOUR vote, observe how nothing changes, and ask yourself why.

Meet the new boss....same as the old boss.

borndead1 wrote:

When was the last time a 3rd party candidate was allowed in the debates? 1992?

You go cast YOUR vote, observe how nothing changes, and ask yourself why.

Meet the new boss....same as the old boss.

borndead1 wrote: