Yeah, but the car companies and banks paid it back with interest.

Say – what do you think a person’s ‘fair share’ of the debt should be?

Brewha wrote:

A. GM still owes money against the debt.
B. The banks? When the bank bailout is used as a negative, the liberals say it GWB who initiated it. When they claim it's being paid back with interest, they give credit to Obama. So which is it today?

As for fair share, are you looking for a dollar value or a percentage?
And is it really fair to ask a question that you probably don't even have an answer for yourself?

tailgater wrote:

Yeah, but the car companies and banks paid it back with interest.

Brewha wrote:

Waaaaaaaaait a minute here.
If I am that far in debt, then where is all my free stuff?


:-k

Stinkdyr wrote:

:^o 🤥 🤥


[-( 🤐 🤐


[-x 😳 😳


http://reason.com/archives/2010/04/27/gms-phony-bailout-payback 

DrMaddVibe wrote:

BTW, at what point do WE quit subsidizing the Volt?

Abrignac wrote:

It amazes me how TRUTH is spun to make something sound better. When GM FULLY reimburses the American people ALL the $$$ it was doled, then it can say it has paid back the American People.

BTW, at what point do WE quit subsidizing the Volt?

Abrignac wrote:

My sense of fair would be that Americans pay in accordance with their income. And that interest and holding be taxed at the same rate as labor income.

Brewha wrote:

Looks like we have a market, makes my head hurt.

http://www.stripes.com/news/military-adding-more-electric-vehicles-to-fleet-1.184928 

dubleuhb wrote:

But people like Mitt pay more annually then we'll ever pay over our entire lives.

tailgater wrote:

But people like Mitt pay more annually then we'll ever pay over our entire lives.

tailgater wrote:

Actually Mitt paid MORE than his fair share!#-o

DrMaddVibe wrote:

This is one of Mit's actions I agree with.

Brewha wrote:

Fair share?


I think we need a percentage system based on who the taxpayer voted for. If you voted for a big spender then buckle up buttercup you're flipping the bill.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Fair share?


I think we need a percentage system based on who the taxpayer voted for. If you voted for a big spender then buckle up buttercup you're flipping the bill.

ZRX1200 wrote: