Unless your intent is to only grant citizenship to land-owners, one would argue that owning land in the US is not the definition of having a vested interest in the organization.
What about individuals who choose to get rid of homes and move into apartments for ease of maintenance?
One could legitimately run an entire business out of rented space, employ 1000's of people without being a property owner of the business or their own personal property. (Yes this does happen, one of our facilities has been operated out of rented space for over a decade, with a few millions of dollars of sunk upgrades just in the past 3 years)
victor809 wrote: