ZRX1200
13 years ago
Lottery is for more govt jobs and spending.

We spend too much on "education" not educating. PERS and admin costs are ridiculous.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
13 years ago

Lottery is for more govt jobs and spending.

We spend too much on "education" not educating. PERS and admin costs are ridiculous.

ZRX1200 wrote:



I have no problem with a good teacher being paid well. how one should be evaluated is beyond me.
ZRX1200
13 years ago
I agree they should be well paid if they deserve it.

Unions have entirely too much control.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
13 years ago

I agree they should be well paid if they deserve it.

Unions have entirely too much control.

ZRX1200 wrote:




I will leave that to each community and state to decide. All i know about my children's' school teachers thus far is that bad teachers don't return after a couple years or so.
Russiancrusher
13 years ago
Robert, Robert, Robert:

ROMNEY?

Enough said,LOL.

Eric
HockeyDad
13 years ago
Voted to throw a bunch of judges out!
bloody spaniard
13 years ago
^ Sounds sensible like changing soiled clothes... Shame there's no term limits across the board.

...and thanks again for not doubling down on a fool, Robert. He had his 4 years.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
13 years ago

^ Sounds sensible like changing soiled clothes... Shame there's no term limits across the board.

bloody spaniard wrote:



Good judges and justices are very hard to come by. Not only do they have to have several right qualities in balance, but also real experience. The learning curve is very steep. I will never support a judicial candidate, no matter who it is, who runs against a good sitting judge. Just brings on unpredictable "new blood" who have no experience, which is not a good thing. It is a difficult job and requires one to give up alot in return for their service.
Russiancrusher
13 years ago


Josh Whedon on Romney



bloody spaniard
13 years ago

Good judges and justices are very hard to come by. Not only do they have to have several right qualities in balance, but also real experience. The learning curve is very steep. I will never support a judicial candidate, no matter who it is, who runs against a good sitting judge. Just brings on unpredictable "new blood" who have no experience, which is not a good thing. It is a difficult job and requires one to give up alot in return for their service.

rfenst wrote:




Why are good judges/justices (throw in politicians while you're at it) "hard to come by"? We have an inexhaustible supply.
I've always been of the opinion that absolute power corrupts absolutely especially with time. IMHO trades such as bricklaying, sculpting, painting, even IT work improve with time and experience. Elected officials usually only get arrogant & more power hungry as time passes. It is human nature for these folks to become intoxicated with their ability to grant/seek favors and mark their place in history. Thus, we have to help them along to a law practice retirement & replace them periodically. Unfortunately, their voting constituents usually stand by their benefactors through good or bad like a good woman and vote them back in. Terms are needed, otherwise peoples' cynicism towards the broken system will be justified and self-fulfilling. Basta. Enough with the foolishness. Change these officials as you do shoes and underwear. Otherwise, they stink.



On an associated note, I've always contended that all what we really need to do is simplify our laws a la the Code of Hammurabi & hire minimum wage law clerks to interpret & apply.
teedubbya
13 years ago
usually the quick simplistic knee jerk reaction is the best solution
DrafterX
13 years ago

usually the quick simplistic knee jerk reaction is the best solution

teedubbya wrote:




they weren't talking about touching themselves.... 😟
bloody spaniard
13 years ago

usually the quick simplistic knee jerk reaction is the best solution

teedubbya wrote:




I disagree. We need our betters with their big foreheads to study every situation carefully & tell us what to think.
We're two stoopid.
dstieger
13 years ago

Josh Whedon on Romney



Russiancrusher wrote:



Shiny! Embrace the future - vote for Rombie! 'Joss', by the way.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I voted Perot on an absentee ballot (early) in '92. Shortly after I mailed my ballot, he started in with the public paranoia about the RNC conspiracy to get to him through his daughter's wedding (or some such silliness.) I thought for years that I'd have voted differently had I waited for election day. Now, I'm glad I helped push the 'legitimacy' of a third party to 19% - And, I am convinced he'd have been a better president than Clinton was and better than GHWB II would have been. Loved Stockdale on the debate stage.
tailgater
13 years ago

I have no problem with a good teacher being paid well. how one should be evaluated is beyond me.

rfenst wrote:



Teachers (good ones) should be paid well.
And they should have good benefits.
And strong pensions.

As long as they don't raise my taxes to pay for it all.








bloody spaniard
13 years ago

Shiny! Embrace the future - vote for Rombie! 'Joss', by the way.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I voted Perot on an absentee ballot (early) in '92. Shortly after I mailed my ballot, he started in with the public paranoia about the RNC conspiracy to get to him through his daughter's wedding (or some such silliness.) I thought for years that I'd have voted differently had I waited for election day. Now, I'm glad I helped push the 'legitimacy' of a third party to 19% - And, I am convinced he'd have been a better president than Clinton was and better than GHWB II would have been. Loved Stockdale on the debate stage.

dstieger wrote:




Yes (what an embarrassment) & definitely YES (eccentricities and all). =d> Unfortunately, the honorable yet befuddled Stockdale not so much...#-o

I'm giving the Republicans one last chance. If Romney gets elected, which I doubt, and governs like an Obama, you can count me in your third party/spoiler hijinks from hereon out. I will have permanently lost interest in either major party.
teedubbya
13 years ago
If it can not fit into a 15 second sound bite or into a sentance or two in a discount cigar forum it is likely the wrong solution.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Why are good judges/justices (throw in politicians while you're at it) "hard to come by"? We have an inexhaustible supply.
I've always been of the opinion that absolute power corrupts absolutely especially with time.

bloody spaniard wrote:




Yes but you forget the Great Lawyer Shortage of 1963.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

If it can not fit into a 15 second sound bite or into a sentance or two in a discount cigar forum it is likely the wrong solution.

teedubbya wrote:




Stop trying to act like you're above it.
teedubbya
13 years ago

Stop trying to act like you're above it.

HockeyDad wrote:



I'm NOT above it.

I'm FOR it.
Users browsing this topic