HockeyDad
13 years ago
How will that bill look and be paid under Obamacare?
DrafterX
13 years ago
we will still get billed under Obamacare..?? 😕
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

At Dr. Mad:

Oh how do I get started...shesh...I won't bother...you are truly hopeless. Okay, I will say this though. If you want Holland's roads, you have to pay Holland's taxes (and maybe smoke a little weed too). Oxford, while cool, is only one university and I'd stack our Ivy League up against it any day. I think we have eight and at least one of them has a pretty good football team (BEAT THE DUCKS!). Other countries can try to challenge our currency's status, but during every economic downturn...everybody BUYS AMERICAN BABY!!!

Cheer up dude, or buy a bomb shelter...either way, I'm done arguing with you!

[-x

SMGBobbyScott wrote:




Arguing? That's what you call it? Whatever. Act like my ex wife and just scream about nothing then. Feel better?

I talked about Holland's dam system and you type up about roads...then you talked about smoking dope? Who's high on that stuff when you dare to compare the 2? Either way taxes will be spent. One nation OBVIOUSLY did it better than another! SHOCKER...America isn't #1!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_levee_failures_in_Greater_New_Orleans 


Then you went on about Ivy league vs Oxford...and brought in sports teams? Who gives a flying rat's ass about sports teams? Really? Cheer about your favorite all you want but last time I checked there was no prestigious higher learning grant like being a Rhodes Scholar...from OXFORD!

Then that leaves us with the currency status...http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_05/wibbelsman050206.html

The fix is in...what's going on with the dollar now? Hint...it's NOT stronger.


Like to think you can have an actual discussion, but that's a lost art with someone hellbent on arguing off the bat!




SMGBobbyScott
13 years ago

How will that bill look and be paid under Obamacare?

HockeyDad wrote:



Well, under ObamaCare (as I understand it at least...some of the regs still haven't been written)...the bill will look similar to mine...at least for 95% of Americans. That will save a ton of money for many and save the credit ratings of a ton of others. Needless to say the hospitals will lose a cash cow...I won't shed a tear.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Well, under ObamaCare (as I understand it at least...some of the regs still haven't been written)...the bill will look similar to mine...at least for 95% of Americans. That will save a ton of money for many and save the credit ratings of a ton of others. Needless to say the hospitals will lose a cash cow...I won't shed a tear.

SMGBobbyScott wrote:



95% the same, 5% win, and hospitals take a beating... Sounds like hospitaling is about to become a bad business. Weird thing is I thought hospitals and doctors were for Obamacare.

Maybe somebody got a double dose of "hope"!
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

95% the same, 5% win, and hospitals take a beating... Sounds like hospitaling is about to become a bad business. Weird thing is I thought hospitals and doctors were for Obamacare.

Maybe somebody got a double dose of "hope"!

HockeyDad wrote:




An overdose on Hope?

Mon du![gonzo]
teedubbya
13 years ago

95% the same, 5% win, and hospitals take a beating... Sounds like hospitaling is about to become a bad business. Weird thing is I thought hospitals and doctors were for Obamacare.

Maybe somebody got a double dose of "hope"!

HockeyDad wrote:



Hopspitals (or at lest their Associations) sure got a pot of gold (a few hunnert mil in one area alone (HEN))
SMGBobbyScott
13 years ago

95% the same, 5% win, and hospitals take a beating... Sounds like hospitaling is about to become a bad business. Weird thing is I thought hospitals and doctors were for Obamacare.

Maybe somebody got a double dose of "hope"!

HockeyDad wrote:



Well, when 45-50 million people suddenly become insured...hospitals have to win. They just win in different ways. Instead of over billing in the ER and urgent care they will actually get paid for surgery and hospital stays. It will take some time to see how the math will play out but it would be nice to see organization's being paid for what they actually do rather than padded billing (i.e. $500 hammers, toilet seats, etc.) and yes, I know that those were special cases but you get my point.

Also, the issue is that 95% win, 5% are out and the hospitals have to adjust their business model to be more customer focused rather than payor focused. Time will tell if it plays out that way...
tailgater
13 years ago

Well, under ObamaCare (as I understand it at least...some of the regs still haven't been written)...the bill will look similar to mine...at least for 95% of Americans. That will save a ton of money for many and save the credit ratings of a ton of others. Needless to say the hospitals will lose a cash cow...I won't shed a tear.

SMGBobbyScott wrote:



Odd.
Because there is nary a category under the sun that qualifies as encompassing "95% of Americans".
Especially when discussing such a bill as healthcare, where many will strive to keep their existing providers while many others manipulate the system to get the "free" coverage provided by yours truly.
Yet you claim this will have no effect on the bill?
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Hopspitals (or at lest their Associations) sure got a pot of gold (a few hunnert mil in one area alone (HEN))

teedubbya wrote:




That is odd. I heard they lost a cash cow.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Well, when 45-50 million people suddenly become insured...hospitals have to win. They just win in different ways. Instead of over billing in the ER and urgent care they will actually get paid for surgery and hospital stays. It will take some time to see how the math will play out but it would be nice to see organization's being paid for what they actually do rather than padded billing (i.e. $500 hammers, toilet seats, etc.) and yes, I know that those were special cases but you get my point.

Also, the issue is that 95% win, 5% are out and the hospitals have to adjust their business model to be more customer focused rather than payor focused. Time will tell if it plays out that way...

SMGBobbyScott wrote:




Sounds like we're betting on that "hope" thing again!
HockeyDad
13 years ago

An overdose on Hope?

DrMaddVibe wrote:





...And extra big-ass fries from Carls JR!
teedubbya
13 years ago

That is odd. I heard they lost a cash cow.

HockeyDad wrote:



it just moved to a different field... and there are many more

that's the problem with the bill is there are little nuggets everywhere.... I'm not sure anyone understands it completely despite all the expert analysis in here
HockeyDad
13 years ago
I'm trying to figure out if I'm one of the 95% or the 5% when my company eliminates medical insurance
teedubbya
13 years ago

I'm trying to figure out if I'm one of the 95% or the 5% when my company eliminates medical insurance

HockeyDad wrote:



be both
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

...And extra big-ass fries from Carls JR!

HockeyDad wrote:



You said that like the guy that does those Monster Truck show commercials didncha?
tailgater
13 years ago

be both

teedubbya wrote:



So in other words....All In?
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

it just moved to a different field... and there are many more

that's the problem with the bill is there are little nuggets everywhere.... I'm not sure anyone understands it completely despite all the expert analysis in here

teedubbya wrote:




Yeah...stop listening and posting in here...go listen to more insHannity! He'll tell you all you need to know!
tailgater
13 years ago

it just moved

teedubbya wrote:



Was it the insurance talk, the fawing over Obama, or something more subtle?
leftyposthole
13 years ago
Our hospital has two diff. charges for the same procedure. One price for those with ins. and half as much for those without. Who is screwing who...................
Users browsing this topic