DrafterX
13 years ago
Colorado family being evicted over stolen shoes
Published December 11, 2012

GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. - It was a tough story to hear, but on Friday KJCT sat down and talked with Tanya Abbey, a single mother who is being forced to leave her apartment after her 13-year-old son stole a pair of shoes from Kmart.

"I don't know what I'm going to do," said Abbey.

Tanya's a single mother of three who has found herself in a tough spot.

She and her family won't be home for Christmas after her teenage son Oran got caught shoplifting a pair of shoes.

The act violated the family's lease.

"My shoes were getting warn out, it was getting cold and my feet were getting cold," said Oran.

Now he has much more to worry about than cold feet.

"[I feel] Like I let my mom down, like I let everyone down," adds Oran.

The manager of Garden Village gave us a general statement saying, "Any criminal activity on or near the premises is grounds for immediate eviction."

Young Oran says he didn't realize his actions would put his entire family at risk.

"I thought it would just affect me, I had no idea it would affect my mom or my brother and sister. I feel like if they should be kicking anyone out it should be me," said Oran.

"It just makes me feel horrible, it makes me feel like I can't even give my kids a Christmas now, I have to pack up my stuff and store it, instead of putting up a tree," said Oran.

So renters beware. For you never know when just one act could put you and your loved ones out on the street, even during the holidays.

"And for the whole family to be punished for itโ€ฆthat's just not, not cool, it's not right, it's heartless is what it is," said Tanya.

Now Tanya and her three little ones just hope they can find room at the Homeward Bound homeless shelter this holiday.




Film at 11.... ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ







so, will they get bailed with a new place to live with new shoes and stuff or will they get to stay..?? ๐Ÿ˜•
Gene363
13 years ago
Consequences, if you can't do the time, don't do the crime.
frankj1
13 years ago
not from Colorado...is Grand Junction one of those notorious blighted inner city hoods?






stirring up stuff
HockeyDad
13 years ago
Grand Junction is a predominantly arab suburb of Denver.
frankj1
13 years ago

Grand Junction is a predominantly arab suburb of Denver.

HockeyDad wrote:


seriously? I was poking around with my comment.


cacman
13 years ago

Grand Junction is a predominantly arab suburb of Denver.

HockeyDad wrote:


What???
Grand Junction is on the western side of the state close to Utah. It's not even close to Denver.

Never been there but it does have an airport, is known for its shopping, and is adjacent to Colorado National Monument park. Population around 60,000.
Mrs.Tank
13 years ago
"Any criminal activity on or near the premises is grounds for immediate eviction"



is the Kmart near this place? That's where the crime took place. Has the boy been convicted? If not, then they don't have grounds yet.

Just my .02 - not that anyone would pay me for that.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

What???
Grand Junction is on the western side of the state close to Utah. It's not even close to Denver.

Never been there but it does have an airport, is known for its shopping, and is adjacent to Colorado National Monument park. Population around 60,000.

cacman wrote:




Nuh-uh
cacman
13 years ago

Nuh-uh

HockeyDad wrote:


Really! I swear. Ranked #43 America's Best and Worst Cities for Crime (Smallest Metro Areas)

Harsh for the family.
rfenst
13 years ago

"Any criminal activity on or near the premises is grounds for immediate eviction"



is the Kmart near this place? That's where the crime took place. Has the boy been convicted? If not, then they don't have grounds yet.

Just my .02 - not that anyone would pay me for that.

Mrs.Tank wrote:



Penalty against innocent family members seems too harsh, but the state law may permit this as part of the lease contract. "Near", in this instance is either its plain meaning or "vague".

She needs to fight this to sty in her home for the winter. maybe the publicity will cause the landlord a change of heart.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Really! I swear. Ranked #43 America's Best and Worst Cities for Crime (Smallest Metro Areas)

Harsh for the family.

cacman wrote:




No way man....its in the Little Baghdad section of Denver.
rfenst
13 years ago

"Any criminal activity on or near the premises is grounds for immediate eviction"



is the Kmart near this place? That's where the crime took place. Has the boy been convicted? If not, then they don't have grounds yet.

Just my .02 - not that anyone would pay me for that.

Mrs.Tank wrote:



Penalty against innocent family members seems too harsh, but the state law may permit this as part of the lease contract. "Near", in this instance is either its plain meaning or "vague".

She needs to fight this to sty in her home for the winter. maybe the publicity will cause the landlord a change of heart.
dubleuhb
13 years ago

Penalty against innocent family members seems too harsh, but the state law may permit this as part of the lease contract. "Near", in this instance is either its plain meaning or "vague".

She needs to fight this to sty in her home for the winter. maybe the publicity will cause the landlord a change of heart.

rfenst wrote:


This will happen, shame the big bad landlord. How dare he make the po family abide by the rules.
frankj1
13 years ago
real hot topic, but actually has no relation to ghettoes at all, eh?
rfenst
13 years ago

This will happen, shame the big bad landlord. How dare he make the po family abide by the rules.

dubleuhb wrote:



I have no problem with the lease provision if it is applicable to protect the landlord's interest in the rental property- like dealing drugs or stealing from apartment complex residents' cars. On the other hand, mom's and minor sibling's penalty enforced by the landlord should only go so far. It is society's values, public policy and the law that determine how far. If the landlord caves-in, that will be a decision based upon its/his/her free will.
dubleuhb
13 years ago
If he caves then isn't the precedent set that the lease doesn't matter ? The next family that may have a family member cross the line can then go back and use this against him , no ?

You know they will lay a guilt trip on him and make him look like the bad guy forgetting about who really is at fault here.
rfenst
13 years ago

If he caves then isn't the precedent set that the lease doesn't matter ? The next family that may have a family member cross the line can then go back and use this against him , no ?

You know they will lay a guilt trip on him and make him look like the bad guy forgetting about who really is at fault here.

dubleuhb wrote:



No. It does not create a binding precedent as to other leases. Each is an individual contract, enforcement of which can be done on a case by case basis. the leases may vary from one to another too. Most of the time, sellers can deal with each buyer's identical transaction differently.

And, who is really at fault? Don't know b/c I don't know what the parties meant by "near" in the lease.
Who is at fault for the theft? The kid is. But not his miother or siblings.
DrafterX
13 years ago
I can blame the mom a little bit... in town here one of the churches gives away free clothes and stuff almost every week.... sounded like the kid needed shoes real bad... I mean it was k-mart, {K-Mart Sucks)..... it's not like he was going after the latest and greatest Nike baskeball shoe or somethin... Not blaming her completely but did she not notice the kids shoes were falling apart..??

on the other hand the store manager could have seen the desperation and handled the situation with a little compassion.... ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago
Like wow man, just give the kid some Obamashoes.
DrafterX
13 years ago
back when I was a kid, we wrapped out feet in old newspapers and duct tape... and we were happy about it... ๐ŸŒซ
Users browsing this topic