cacman
13 years ago

DP feels that AR15’s are safe and no big deal. He is also afraid that the big bad government is coming to take away all his guns, ammo, camo, and force him to eat bean sprouts – a fate worse then peace without honor . . . . .

Brewha wrote:


Some believe guberment acts in the People's best interest - to protect and care for them. Some don't.
Not that I subscribe to the whole conspiracy, but a brother on another board offered this:
dpnewell
13 years ago
Bean sprouts? Damn, it’s worse then I ever imagined!!!!!!
frankj1
13 years ago

Bean sprouts? Damn, it’s worse then I ever imagined!!!!!!

dpnewell wrote:


luckily not soy bean sprouts though.
DrafterX
13 years ago

DP feels that AR15’s are safe and no big deal. He is also afraid that the big bad government is coming to take away all his guns, ammo, camo, and force him to eat bean sprouts – a fate worse then peace without honor . . . . .

Brewha wrote:



Some feel pitbulls are dangerous and should be banned... are you willing to round them all up and destroy them..?? 😕

It kinda goes back to the owners being responsible huh... 😟
DrafterX
13 years ago
😱
What about the war puppy-dogs..?? Do we destroy them after they serve our country..?? 😕
Brewha
13 years ago

😱
What about the war puppy-dogs..?? Do we destroy them after they serve our country..?? 😕

DrafterX wrote:


Dude, the words you putting in my mouth don't taste so good . . . . .


Dogs are not guns. Dogs are domesticated animals and the responsibly of us all.
Who would punish a puppy because of they way a person uses them?
DrafterX
13 years ago
Irresponsible people traîn puppy-dogs to be bad... punish those people... not everyone who has one...😟
DrafterX
13 years ago
And sorry Brewha... you know I like ya..... I just don't see how taking rights from everyone to make a few feel better is going to prevent further acts of violence.... 😟
dpnewell
13 years ago

Dude, the words you putting in my mouth don't taste so good . . . . .


Dogs are not guns. Dogs are domesticated animals and the responsibly of us all.
Who would punish a puppy because of they way a person uses them?

Brewha wrote:



Yet you have no problem punishing responsible gun owners for the actions of a few irresponsible crazies. Muscle cars are another problem. Who the heck needs a deadly 4,000 lb. missile that can do more then double the legal speed limit? They are race cars, should be run by professionals only, and have no purpose outside a closed race track. Ban them now before some wacko runs a school bus off the road killing a bunch of innocent children.

Oh, wait a minute. Too late. 29 children killed in a school bus accident in Martinez CA, another 24 in Carollton, KY, plus dozens more. Where's the freak'n media outrage?!

My gosh! I just found that 300 innocent children are murdered by swiming pools each year! Why do we allow crazies to own these large bodies of deadly water? Again, where's the outrage?!

Are these deaths any less tragic because they weren’t killed by a madman with a gun? Why aren’t the death of these children national news for weeks on end? Can you say “hypocrisy”?
DrafterX
13 years ago
We should prolly ban school busses... 😟
Brewha
13 years ago

Yet you have no problem punishing responsible gun owners for the actions of a few irresponsible crazies. Muscle cars are another problem. Who the heck needs a deadly 4,000 lb. missile that can do more then double the legal speed limit? They are race cars, should be run by professionals only, and have no purpose outside a closed race track. Ban them now before some wacko runs a school bus off the road killing a bunch of innocent children.

Oh, wait a minute. Too late. 29 children killed in a school bus accident in Martinez CA, another 24 in Carollton, KY, plus dozens more. Where's the freak'n media outrage?!

My gosh! I just found that 300 innocent children are murdered by swiming pools each year! Why do we allow crazies to own these large bodies of deadly water? Again, where's the outrage?!

Are these deaths any less tragic because they weren’t killed by a madman with a gun? Why aren’t the death of these children national news for weeks on end? Can you say “hypocrisy”?

dpnewell wrote:



Can you say “Off on a wild tangent with no hope of a free return”?


If you have drugs, take them, now.
Or perhaps you already have . . . . .
csgamecock
13 years ago
"Nikki Haley 7 hours ago ·

My stance on guns: As a CWP holder, I am pro 2nd amendment and pro 10th amendment and will defend both. I would support open carry and reciprocity with any other state. The horrible shootings we have seen over the past few years have been related to individuals with mental health so my administration went right to the source. My first year in office we dramatically increased funding to mental health by $16 mill the first year and $11 mill this past budget. I am committed to helping those with mental health issues get the help they need while defending our 2nd amendment"

This was a post by SC Governor Nikki Haley earlier today

While I haven't always agreed with her views, the basic concept is correct
Don't punish society in general for the actions of a few.
Don't hold society accountable rather hold the guilty accountable

This is the same type of mentality that absolutely has driven me crazy the past few years.
While working with kids as a School Resource Officer it became crystal clear that a lot (not all mind you) but a good portion of
Parents now days want "society" IE schools systems, government agencies, etc to raise their chidren. The ones I'm referring to just don't care, don't wanna take responsibility and want someone to blame when something goes wrong. It's this selfish mentality that has contributed to the downfall of this great nation.
Brewha
13 years ago

And sorry Brewha... you know I like ya..... I just don't see how taking rights from everyone to make a few feel better is going to prevent further acts of violence.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:


No worries - it's a balancing act. We gotta have SOME restrictions - and we some times have TOO many.
I'm just'a tryin' to keeps them scales balanced . . . .
pdxstogieman
13 years ago
Why should responsible Nile crocodile owners be punished because of the irresponsible actions of a few Nile Crocodile owners who let theirs get loose and eat the neighbors kids. I keep my crocodile for protection against the potential home invaders and the reincarnation of King George III.
HockeyDad
13 years ago

Why should responsible Nile crocodile owners be punished because of the irresponsible actions of a few Nile Crocodile owners who let theirs get loose and eat the neighbors kids. I keep my crocodile for protection against the potential home invaders and the reincarnation of King George III.

pdxstogieman wrote:




You have no constitutional right to own a Nile crocodile so the government will pass whatever laws it wants in regards to Nile crocodiles and you will shut up and **** like it.
bloody spaniard
13 years ago

Why should responsible Nile crocodile owners be punished because of the irresponsible actions of a few Nile Crocodile owners who let theirs get loose and eat the neighbors kids. I keep my crocodile for protection against the potential home invaders and the reincarnation of King George III.

pdxstogieman wrote:




LOL!! Yeah, but if you take away crocs from law abiding croc owners only criminals will wear crocs. Everyone else will have gators.

The fact is, I don't own guns and probably never will, BUT I will defend to the death of any gun owner their right to own one.

Brewha
13 years ago
What a croc . . . .




No animals were harmed during the making of this post.
DadZilla3
13 years ago

Why should responsible Nile crocodile owners be punished because of the irresponsible actions of a few Nile Crocodile owners who let theirs get loose and eat the neighbors kids. I keep my crocodile for protection against the potential home invaders and the reincarnation of King George III.

pdxstogieman wrote:


We should pass a law limiting the number of teeth those Nile crocodiles should have. Why should anyone need to own a crocodile with 100 teeth or more anyway? Having a crocodile with that many teeth serves no useful home protection purpose.
Brewha
13 years ago

We should pass a law limiting the number of teeth those Nile crocodiles should have. Why should anyone need to own a crocodile with 100 teeth or more anyway? Having a crocodile with that many teeth serves no useful home protection purpose.

DadZilla3 wrote:


Now there's an argument with some bite.
DrafterX
13 years ago
What if I promise to only put 99 teeth in my croc..??😕
Users browsing this topic