DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

http://io9.com/5976374/the-science-of-comment-trolls?utm_campaign=io9_Facebook_socialflow&utm_source=Socialflow&utm_medium=Facebook

victor809 wrote:




FAIL!🐴
Brewha
13 years ago
Ok Victor.
Here it comes;




=d>




Your welcome.
HockeyDad
13 years ago
George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication? Really....this exists?
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication? Really....this exists?

HockeyDad wrote:




...and several others but let's let Brewie and Vikki have at it...birds of a feather.

Just check the critical thinking at the door and they're too busy patting each other on the backs!
wheelrite
13 years ago

...and several others but let's let Brewie and Vikki have at it...birds of a feather.

Just check the critical thinking at the door and they're too busy patting each other on the backs!

DrMaddVibe wrote:



and a Reach Around ?

#-o
victor809
13 years ago
I do find it funny that the thread would attract trolly-mc-trollerson. I see he went straight for the personal attacks. Kinda ironic.
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

and a Reach Around ?

#-o

wheelrite wrote:




Of course!

He plays rubby Georgetown style!


You can tell he really didn't even read the article he posted. If he did...he'd see the glaring holes in it.
wheelrite
13 years ago

Of course!

He plays rubby Georgetown style!


You can tell he really didn't even read the article he posted. If he did...he'd see the glaring holes in it.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Weiner Car !!
Brewha
13 years ago

I do find it funny that the thread would attract trolly-mc-trollerson. I see he went straight for the personal attacks. Kinda ironic.

victor809 wrote:


Don't mind the scarecrow. When he's not looking for a brain he plays the under medicated clown of Cbid.
And Wheel can't resist gay-homo jokes (I think the pressure to stay in the closet is getting to him).
DadZilla3
13 years ago

George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication? Really....this exists?

HockeyDad wrote:


It has 'government grant' written all over it.
victor809
13 years ago
... are you of the impression that there are many other sources of grant money?

Really... kind of doubt anywhere else would give a group money to do this, since there isn't much profit in it.
borndead1
13 years ago

... are you of the impression that there are many other sources of grant money?

Really... kind of doubt anywhere else would give a group money to do this, since there isn't much profit in it.

victor809 wrote:




Maybe not "profit" in the traditional sense, but job (income) security, recognition, more grants, etc.


If the NRA published a "study" on gun violence, would you view the results with skepticism?
DadZilla3
13 years ago

... are you of the impression that there are many other sources of grant money?

Really... kind of doubt anywhere else would give a group money to do this, since there isn't much profit in it.

victor809 wrote:



More like, kind of doubt anywhere else would give a group money to do this, since there isn't much sense in it.
victor809
13 years ago
... I'm not seeing where the contention is here. If you think the study is bogus, check the materials and methods section. If you think it is worthless to do the study, ask yourself if you had evidence of the amount of destruction trolls bring to the ability to have a cogent conversation before this.

This isn't rocket science, nor is it supposed to be divisive. There are trolls on every side of a political discussion, so I don't know why there would be any defensiveness. And hell, I doubt this study got much grant money (if it makes you feel any better).
DrMaddVibe
13 years ago

... I'm not seeing where the contention is here. If you think the study is bogus, check the materials and methods section. If you think it is worthless to do the study, ask yourself if you had evidence of the amount of destruction trolls bring to the ability to have a cogent conversation before this.

This isn't rocket science, nor is it supposed to be divisive. There are trolls on every side of a political discussion, so I don't know why there would be any defensiveness. And hell, I doubt this study got much grant money (if it makes you feel any better).

victor809 wrote:





Mother Jones...unnamed sources...I could go on, but what's the point? You only saw the word "Troll" and you're trying to shoehorn it on Cinderella's ugly stepsister's foot. Good luck with your faulty point based on assumptions with no credibility! Then again, that's what you do! Georgetown rubby players getting a beatdown for having the ghey...Chick-Fil-A...yada yada yada...only on this one you forgot the crocodile tears!

victor809
13 years ago


If the NRA published a "study" on gun violence, would you view the results with skepticism?

borndead1 wrote:



The argument has always been that studies published by private organizations (pharmaceutical companies, private charities, cigar forum polls, anti-smoking agencies) are more suspect than those done by a university, since universities have the tenure system. In theory, having tenure allows professors to study and publish opinions which are possibly contrary to popular opinion, if their research were to point them in that direction. (this is not going to be a discussion of whether the tenure system is abused, or whether there aren't other forces influencing them, I'm just pointing out that I would be more inclined to believe a study performed by someone who's future employment isn't immediately at the mercy of the results.)

Other than that, I'll take data from anywhere. If you suspect they are skewing the conclusions, then look at the raw data. In a PUBLISHED study (not the link I provided, but the actual article, published in a reputable journal) they always include the raw data.

But you know... trolls gotta troll... seems to be the only thing they can do.
Brewha
13 years ago
It is important to point out that while it is certainly not true of most posters, the trolling that I do provides a needed and valued public service to my fellow BOTL'S.

Being one the few with the clarity of thought, sufficiently sharp gray matter, and the ability to courageously accept the reality of the situation, I provide an ongoing benefit by shining the light of truth and logic on the important issues of the day.

No need to thank me.
victor809
13 years ago

It is important to point out that while it is certainly not true of most posters, the trolling that I do provides a needed and valued public service to my fellow BOTL'S.

Being one the few with the clarity of thought, sufficiently sharp gray matter, and the ability to courageously accept the reality of the situation, I provide an ongoing benefit by shining the light of truth and logic on the important issues of the day.

No need to thank me.

Brewha wrote:



^ if this were the case you would agree with me more
Brewha
13 years ago
Don't be jealous.
Users browsing this topic