They clearly have had the right to determine what kind of weapon you have and can use. Otherwise everyone on here would own fully automatic weapons, bazookas, grenades, or even tanks. They just havn't got down to limiting semi- auto rifles and pistols. Jack's post is crap.

drywalldog wrote:

They clearly have had the right to determine what kind of weapon you have and can use. Otherwise everyone on here would own fully automatic weapons, bazookas, grenades, or even tanks. They just havn't got down to limiting semi- auto rifles and pistols. Jack's post is crap.

drywalldog wrote:

Saying "the Founders would have thought X" doesn't add any weight to your argument because 1.) they've all been dead for at least 150 years, 2.) The Founding Fathers were a very diverse group of men; each with various interests, goals, and political philosophies, so it's virtually impossible to not only define what they would "want," but also to classify who "they" are, and 3.) How does one claim to have the prophetic power to say what this group of people wanted in the first place? Let's get past this cliched line of reasoning.

tegulator wrote:

They clearly have had the right to determine what kind of weapon you have and can use. Otherwise everyone on here would own fully automatic weapons, bazookas, grenades, or even tanks. They just havn't got down to limiting semi- auto rifles and pistols. Jack's post is crap.

drywalldog wrote:

Saying "the Founders would have thought X" doesn't add any weight to your argument because 1.) they've all been dead for at least 150 years, 2.) The Founding Fathers were a very diverse group of men; each with various interests, goals, and political philosophies, so it's virtually impossible to not only define what they would "want," but also to classify who "they" are, and 3.) How does one claim to have the prophetic power to say what this group of people wanted in the first place? Let's get past this cliched line of reasoning.

tegulator wrote:

He prolly watched Hawaii five-O the other night.... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

They clearly have had the right to determine what kind of weapon you have and can use. Otherwise everyone on here would own fully automatic weapons, bazookas, grenades, or even tanks. They just havn't got down to limiting semi- auto rifles and pistols. Jack's post is crap.

drywalldog wrote:

Typical liberal smoke screen. Read the Federalist Papers and then tell me we have no idea of what their intent was.

dpnewell wrote:

Who you callin Nancy punk?

drywalldog wrote:

Easy to be tough on here, you!

drywalldog wrote:

They clearly have had the right to determine what kind of weapon you have and can use. Otherwise everyone on here would own fully automatic weapons, bazookas, grenades, or even tanks. They just havn't got down to limiting semi- auto rifles and pistols. Jack's post is crap.

drywalldog wrote:

I never said it was right, the cows been outa that barn a long time, too many here whine like they care only to hear themselves.

drywalldog wrote: