TMCTLT
12 years ago

[W]hy is it that some things seem to be open to " interpretation " vs some are etched in stone as to their meaning and intent?

rfenst wrote:



It often has to do with whether the intent of the law is stated in the particular law itself; its conflict with other law and/or clarity.





Robert, thanks for your reply. But would you mind explaining to the rest of us dumbasses why the legal profession deals in verbiage who's only intent is to confuse. 😣
Gene363
12 years ago

[W]hy is it that some things seem to be open to " interpretation " vs some are etched in stone as to their meaning and intent?

rfenst wrote:



It often has to do with whether the intent of the law is stated in the particular law itself; its conflict with other law and/or clarity.



True. SC is a legalize state and if you don't have a will you are crazy as hell.

If you die without a will:

Children but no spouse: children inherit everything

Spouse but no descendants: spouse inherits everything

Spouse and descendants: spouse inherits 1/2 of your intestate property, descendants inherit everything else

Parents but no spouse or descendants: parents inherit everything

Siblings but no spouse, descendants, or parents: siblings inherit everything

Users browsing this topic