victor809
11 years ago
The satanist group had a really great solution to this.

Businesses simply need to advertise which groups they refuse to serve. I mean, a gay guy/girl looks pretty much like a straight guy/girl (a few exceptions of course)... so if a business feels a religious obligation not to provide service to that group, they really need to advertise it out front, so that the gay guy/girl knows they aren't wanted. I mean, if Johnny Gay buys flowers for his boyfriend every week for a year with no problem... but then asks the same florist to provide flowers for the wedding and is denied, clearly there's been a failing. The florist has been "completely unwittingly" selling flowers to be used for gay purposes (don't ask what those are) for a whole year... and Johnny Gay has been unwittingly supporting a business that doesn't believe he should be allowed to exist.

So, I'd be okay with this as long as every business places a completely visible sign in the window, or on the door that says something to the extent of : "No gays allowed".

That way Johnny Gay knows not to accidentally force them into providing a service to a gay man, and I know not to buy goods from religious people.
victor809
11 years ago

If you call what is happening "evolving " I'll be glad to be dead and gone before the process is complete....This is nothing @ all like segregation but you already knew that and to compare the two....is just laughable. People have NO choice what color skin they're born into nor the wealth of the family they're born into.....THIS to some degree is ALL about FREE CHOICE. But that's the beauty of the 50 United States....your FREE to live wherever you feel most comfortable, while NOT forcing others to knuckle under to outside pressure or loss of revenue or worst yet being ran out of business for not holding with someone else's worldview.

TMCTLT wrote:



Ah TCBY... I didn't forget you... the slowest of all the dwarves....

I think Dan Savage put it best. If you think being gay is a "choice" then feel free to email him and take him up on his challenge

http://www.salon.com/2015/03/09/sometimes_you_have_to_fight_fire_with_fire_dan_savage_fires_back_at_ben_carson_after_claiming_homosexuality_is_a_choice/ 
rfenst
11 years ago

Perhaps insurance companies will refuse medical treatment on Sundays because it is the Sabbath. Far fetched, yes, possible under this law, yes.

Speyside wrote:



Um... Sabath is on Saturday.
Speyside
11 years ago
If you are Jewish, that is correct. If you are Christian it is considered Sunday. Also I was speaking about the Sabbath. What is a Sabath?
TMCTLT
11 years ago

Ah TCBY... I didn't forget you... the slowest of all the dwarves....

I think Dan Savage put it best. If you think being gay is a "choice" then feel free to email him and take him up on his challenge

http://www.salon.com/2015/03/09/sometimes_you_have_to_fight_fire_with_fire_dan_savage_fires_back_at_ben_carson_after_claiming_homosexuality_is_a_choice/ 

victor809 wrote:




I don't give a ratz azz about what Dan Savage or any other savage like yourself believes....se that's the beauty of living in a once free society....we get to be free thinkers. NOT a group of people who get pushed around by trolls like yourself. When science can irrefutably show all of us that a "Homosexual gene" exists.....we can redress this subject. You say I'm stupid, with all your college tuition paid your not smart enough to figure out that it may just come down to who they PREFER to have sex with.


Yet another of my sincerest hopes.....Dashed




The satanist group had a really great solution to this.

Businesses simply need to advertise which groups they refuse to serve. I mean, a gay guy/girl looks pretty much like a straight guy/girl (a few exceptions of course)... so if a business feels a religious obligation not to provide service to that group, they really need to advertise it out front, so that the gay guy/girl knows they aren't wanted. I mean, if Johnny Gay buys flowers for his boyfriend every week for a year with no problem... but then asks the same florist to provide flowers for the wedding and is denied, clearly there's been a failing. The florist has been "completely unwittingly" selling flowers to be used for gay purposes (don't ask what those are) for a whole year... and Johnny Gay has been unwittingly supporting a business that doesn't believe he should be allowed to exist.

So, I'd be okay with this as long as every business places a completely visible sign in the window, or on the door that says something to the extent of : "No gays allowed".

That way Johnny Gay knows not to accidentally force them into providing a service to a gay man, and I know not to buy goods from religious people.

victor809 wrote:





See this is where f*cktards like yourself get off into the weeds of discussion, NOONE said anything about Johnny Homo shouldn't be allowed to exist, HE IS however allowed to find a business to service him( sorry couldn't help it ) the way he sees fit. Then everyone's happy, but they / you think you should be able to force someone to do something against their FREE WILL
TMCTLT
11 years ago

you're right they were born like that and if you ask any gay person if they chose to be gay they will say no, but that they were born like that. It's the same as we didn't choose to be straight when we were born, we just are. It's the same for them.

You talk about loss of revenue, wouldn't providing a service to everyone generate more revenue?

I'm Batman wrote:




YES....just like the bank robber will tell you he couldn't help himself, he needed the money. And please explain the B's in the LGBT crowd......just can't make up their nevermind???? :-"


See most people today think like YOU do.....it's ALL about the $$$. It's NOT that way for everyone, some folks feel strongly enough about these issues they'll risk lost revenue.....they Should NOT however have to risk being put out of business because they can't afford to defend themselves in court OR they get a judge that's soft on the entire lifestyle. Let the FREE market work.....
TMCTLT
11 years ago

I = In
B = Before
T = The
D = Drunk


But, at the moment, I'm waiting for you and Victor to start courting each other again. Y'all make such a wonderful couple.

Abrignac wrote:





Your cute after you been drunk.....
ZRX1200
11 years ago
How will a state law do that nationally Speyside?

The NCAA and Angies List took a stand against this and they're big corporations, should that not be allowed then?

We largely agree it seems, and you've been a good sport. Thanks for the gentlemanly sword fight, I'd take you camping anytime.
tailgater
11 years ago
I'm moving shop to this state so I won't have to sell to cripples. They give me the creeps.

Oh, wait.
Indiana?
Forget it.
wheelrite
11 years ago
Should a Kosher Deli be forced to sell Ham ?


wheel,
wheelrite
11 years ago
I don't think God will really mind if a Baker Bakes a cake for a couple queers that wanna get married...

my.02


wheel,,
Speyside
11 years ago
Aw shucks. I think this is an important topic. Overall I support the rights of individuals. Certainly this is a state law. I see a loophole that needs to be closed. I really can envision corporate greed utilizing this to increase profits.
DrafterX
11 years ago



So, I'd be okay with this as long as every business places a completely visible sign in the window, or on the door that says something to the extent of : "No gays allowed".

victor809 wrote:




This works on Bourbon St... never seen a 'No Gays' sign but the bars are clearly marked if you choose to walk in... 😟
I'm Batman
11 years ago

[/h]


YES....just like the bank robber will tell you he couldn't help himself, he needed the money. And please explain the B's in the LGBT crowd......just can't make up their nevermind???? :-"


See most people today think like YOU do.....it's ALL about the $$$. It's NOT that way for everyone, some folks feel strongly enough about these issues they'll risk lost revenue.....they Should NOT however have to risk being put out of business because they can't afford to defend themselves in court OR they get a judge that's soft on the entire lifestyle. Let the FREE market work.....

TMCTLT wrote:



people today like YOU? it's ALL about the $$$?? I never said it was about the money. YOU'RE the one who talked about lost revenue. I merely commented on it. You say some people feel strongly enough about these issues they'll risk revenue. No doubt that's true and there's people on the other side that feel just as strongly about the issue and will try to fix it.

All men are created equal and I fought damn hard to protect the rights so that ALL men and women would be able to enjoy this right.


teedubbya
11 years ago
So if a baker does not want to sell cakes to black people is that okay or is it just to drafter that is the issue. By the way this does not line up with the national law from what I read, it seems like apples and oranges but it's a nice soundbite.

I'm still looking for the necessity of the law though. The generic seeing writing on the wall business is going out of business elsewhere doesn't quite cut it with me. I'm not even saying the law's not necessary, I would just like to see solid examples of what this law is meant to fix. So far I've not seen any. It seems like an unnecessary law.

Whether it's a conservative law or a liberal law generally when the laws being put in place for no good reason other than a certain group wants it it's a bad thing. Generally in those cases it's the government actually growing or becoming more oppressive either in the name of conservatives or liberals who both really want big government they just want their bigger government. In this case it seems like the law was implemented in the back room and there are certain groups that wanted it who's agendas lineup with the anti-gay agenda. Maybe that's just a coincidence because I'm sure that wouldn't happen in politics.

The sad part is a new law was likely not necessary either to protect gays or to protect religious groups from the boogie man gay people. Now the opposite may very well happen Indiana may be forced to implement a gay protection law of some sort. Talk about unintended consequences.
teedubbya
11 years ago
Okay contradicted myself above but rather than hide it by editing I'll just admit I do think the law is likely unnecessary, unless somebody can give me specific examples of this is intended to fix.
DrafterX
11 years ago
Did this all start at Chik-Fila..?? 😕
teedubbya
11 years ago
I heard Chick-fil-A doesn't want to put ramps in their stores so cros can't get in the doors

They hate gay Muslim cripples.
DrafterX
11 years ago
Those Bassards..!! 😠
dstieger
11 years ago

I heard Chick-fil-A doesn't want to put ramps in their stores so cros can't get in the doors

They hate gay Muslim cripples.

teedubbya wrote:




Who doesn't?
Users browsing this topic