“I understand the grief and the incredible sense of loss that can motivate that,” Clinton said. “As other members of families who’ve lost loved ones have said, that's not what they heard. I don't hold any ill feeling for someone who, in that moment, may not fully recall everything that was or wasn't said.”



😟

DrafterX wrote:

When did she do this?

banderl wrote:

So This post actually made me go and look up what the "lying to families" thing is.

I'm not sure I'd call it worse.

I'm not sure we can establish that she knew the truth at that time.

And there are conflicting reports from the families as to what she even said.

Everyone hears what they want to hear.....

victor809 wrote:

Was this a serious question, or were you being ironic?

tailgater wrote:

Victor,
You and I don't always see eye to eye on the issues.
But you're not usually this for off base.

It's not JUST the gold-star family lies here.

It's everything.

You want lies on tape?
Watch the multitude of youtube videos showing Hillary lying about the emails, with the FBI director saying the complete opposite time and time again.

tailgater wrote:

She had the State Department fabricate the whole You Tube video lie to hide the fact that they were NOT going to send in any military to help them. Despite the fact it was a CIA annex house where they sold weapons out the back door...and had guys on the ground with ruby red lighting up the place so a pinpoint air attack via drone or smart bomb would hit the direct target. Those planes...were turned away.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

I'm going backwards on my responses here, but your post proves my point.

Trump lies and it's front page.
Hillary lies and you get opposing forces trying to define how much she lied.

Maybe it was simply too much when she landed in Bosnia under sniper fire...wait. Oh, nevermind.

tailgater wrote:

I tend to agree with her here.

The important part of the story is "american dead". the important part isn't "because of riot due to video" or "because of planned attack". Either way americans are dead. If you think the important part is trying to parse whether a politician correctly identified the cause within the first 72 hours (there is plenty of time for analysis later)... then I'd say you've got your priorities wrong. But that's just me.

victor809 wrote:

It's obvious the media is in the suit-pant pocket of the Hill Dog.
We get it.

But this whole issue with Trump and the Gold Star families?
The media is chasing down members of the GOP to get comments, and of course none of them are positive.

But where was this push from the media when Hillary did the same thing to the gold star mom of a soldier who died in Benghazi?

Compare the two:
A. Trump is an idiot who said stupid things.
B. Hillary is a greasy dirtbag who said stupid things.

But Hillary's comments are WORSE than Trumps. Trump didn't LIE to the parents. Trump wasn't involved in their son's death. Trump isn't calling the parents liars.

Both are despicable. I get that.
But bring it to a personal level:
If my kid died in service and somebody said the things Trump said, I'd be furious.
But if somebody else was a reason he died? And then lied to me? And then called me a liar when I call them out?

Perspective.

Neither side has any. But the left wear their ignorance like a badge of honor.

tailgater wrote:

I think the perceive bias in the media is largely owing to Trump being an embarrassment to his party. Add to this our on going embarrassment in front of other countries because of his grade school remarks and it seems clear why news would focus on his foibles.

Brewha wrote:

Yes...but of course...because Hillary is the best candidate the Democrats can offer...yes...it's all so there and blatant.



Gimmie a break...she's as bad if not worse than him! Why you can substitute Hillary in your last post and it's EXACTLY the same!

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Well, it seems that Democrats, even Sanders supporters, are firmly behind Clinton. Trump has the most splintered of parties - even his own peeps won't endorse him.

Clinton's foreign policies are (today) a continuation of Obama's - that are well received and respected. Trump, while he really has no cogent policy - has gained disrespect from many nations, that he truly earned.

So no - not the same - not even close - diametrically opposed in fact.

Brewha wrote:

I think the perceive bias in the media is largely owing to Trump being an embarrassment to his party. Add to this our on going embarrassment in front of other countries because of his grade school remarks and it seems clear why news would focus on his foibles.

Brewha wrote:

Keep on believing that. In all the people I know and meet that voted for Sanders...NOT ONE is voting for that bitch.

Clinton's foreign policies are a joke and Putin will stomp a mudhole in her ass and walk it dry...the Chinese and Iranians are right behind too. I predict we will flee the entire Middle East with our tails between our legs akin to what happened in Saigon in the final days of the Vietnam Conflict, but that's just me.

As far as Trump goes...seriously? Who cares. I don't. You're no expert on the guy. You're just buying the steak for the sizzle. Now, Clinton? EVERYONE KNOWS what kind of a lying, scumbag, elitist carpetbagging quid pro quo machine she is.

I will seriously miss the Kenyan King...next to these two it's only way to make him appear Presidential. Jimmy Carter will live to laugh now.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Yeah...and yet the Obama supporters voted for him twice because he was an " eloquent speaker " he had No endearing qualities or foreign policy experience, in a nutshell you voted for a Community Organizer and your making fun of Trump and his supporters???..... you guys don't require much @ all from your POTUS do ya's ?

TMCTLT wrote:

nope

mikey1597 wrote: