I was clarifying (editing) the initial post when you quoted it, I think it makes a bit more sense now.
The issue is that for decades, there was no dependency on nicotine. Cigars were not blended with the sole intent of making your head spin. Strength and body were basically synonymous. Body was power. To get the body, you had to use stronger tobaccos.
Somewhere in the decade after the boom when cigars ceased to be the things of old men, Hollywood producers and mobsters things started to change. Between more demand, Nicaragua getting back to selling tobacco and cigars after years of war and the embargo against them being lifted, and the science of GMO tobacco improving , stronger cigars became the next fad.
At some point after that is when the separation started. When less than reputable manufacturers started pulling tricks like using underfermented tobacco to boost strength. That crap will make your head spin, but it's harsh and it burns your throat. But, people thought that was important.
That's when things broke and the definitions split.
I've had strong cigars that were harsh and did not have a body to them, I might have thought they were impressive at the time, but I didn't know any better. Now, I would consider all of them crap.
To your quest, unfortunately, I've never had a full bodied cigar that does not have some level of strength behind it. Some more than others, Larger RG Anjeos, T52, various limited Tatuaje's that I forget the names of & PAM64 maduro all big body, and at the lower end of the "strength" scale. Aganorsa, El Rico Habano, el Cobre, old Camacho blacks, LFD & JdN at the stronger end. They all packed a bit of a hit, and they were all great cigars.
Maybe someone else out there knows of what you would call a full bodied cigar with low strength, because I do not.
Thunder.Gerbil wrote: