Sessions didn't deny talking to the dude... he denied talking about the election. .. 😟

Hair splitting.

Actually, yes he did. Twice.

So, what's wrong with talking to the Russians if it didn't involve the election. .?? 😕

I don't remember the exact words but they asked him if he discussed the election and he said no... he didn't deny talking to him... 😟

Maybe nothing, maybe everything Drafter. It depends on what was discussed. The for sure wrong in my mind is the lying under oath. I think for example that there is no way that Sessions did not know he spoke with the Russian ambassador. Wouldn't he have scheduled the meeting? Wouldn't he have written down notes. The same goes for Flynn in my mind.

He didn't deny talking to the dude... he was asked specifically if he talked to the dude about the election. .. 😟

Trump won.

Sessions point blank stated that he did not have communications with the Russians. That to me is a lie.

Look for the transcripts.. he was asked if he talked about the election. .. 😟

Franken: "CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’

"Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"

Sessions: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., asked: "Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?"Sessions responded, in total: "No."

😟

robert beat ya by two minutes drafter...."during" the campaign, not if asked "about" the campaign.

Well, it is what it is... I hadn't seen that... but we don't know how he interpreted the question either. . It's a witch hunt.. 😟

I guess if he said he did not talk to them during the campaign then he could not have talked to them about the campaign...

It's a mess... not sure why it's even an issue. . Other than just a witch hunt. .. sad really. .. 😟

I guess it's a reminder that neither side is pure...

True... true... 😟

WITCH HUNT OUTRAGE!!!

Here's an IDEA....

A WEEK before the next
BOHEMAIN GROVE ELITE "fest" get together...

Put a tail on sessions... Then open his bags at the airport to find his fancy access to " the GROVE"
Fest ticket.....

Then you'll realize....

DO WE REALLY??? Want this " little ELF FREAKIOD"
WHO DRESSES IN HOODS and watch's sacrifices
As our
Freakin'
ATTORNEY GENERAL ????

H3LL ...I'd rather have an "EX-DNC BAGMAN"
LIKE ERIC HOLDER ANY DAY OF THE WEEK.

Fiddler, at that time the answer was yes. I had things to do and they did not include this forum or you.

My response to Monkey had to do with two elected officials from AL in which both Monkey and I reside, not with the current ongoing soap opera about Russia costing Queen Hillary the election. But since you see fit to make it about that, I will reply.

As far as Session’s response to the question, I was not in his head, so I have no idea how he took or understood/misunderstood the question concerning the election or during the same. If, in fact, the two meetings in question were as a member of the Senate Armed Service Committee and not as a surrogate for President Trump's campaign, then this is a lot to do about nothing unless the left produces evidence of collusion. This should not be hard to prove if it happened, since it now appears that both Trump and Sessions were being monitored by a third party. If collusion occurred, I will gladly offer my services to help tighten the noose around the necks of those involved.

I really question the genesis for your concern/outrage over the Session’s situation. I don’t recall the same reaction from you during the past eight years when it came to Fast and Furious, Holder being held in contempt of Congress, spying on journalists, IRS scandal, Benghazi, Clinton’s email/pay for influence, and last, but not least, the Iran nuclear deal/ransom payments. Based on this, I’m guessing your current concern/outrage is faux rather than real and is a result of Hillary being defeated rather than you having a real concern for this country and its direction.