DrafterX
9 years ago
screw the useless goats & donkeys... 🤐
frankj1
9 years ago
less freaky than usual...
tonygraz
9 years ago

screw the useless goats & donkeys... 🤐

DrafterX wrote:



Now that that's the Drafter we all know. What, no chikens ?
Mr. Jones
9 years ago
My name is

PAUL

MO-A-DEEB

D.U.N.E.
gummy jones
9 years ago
footage from the air

delta1
9 years ago
cooked goats and donkeys...come and get it...


Trump's approval numbers will go up some more...he keeps dropping bombs he might get to above 50%...even some liberals like to see missiles flying and bombs exploding, regardless of consequences...
gummy jones
9 years ago
much of this has to be intended as a warning to kim jong fat in nk as well
remember when carter was winning peace prizes for negotiating away their nuclear weapons program
the nk hot potato has been unsuccessfully handled by many presidents thus far and, unfortunately, the next time the music stops the stakes will be much higher
delta1
9 years ago
We have reached an untenable position with North Korea...their leader seemingly is willing to sacrifice his nation while taking out millions of innocent people in SK, China and Japan. Their weapons delivery systems, including nuclear weapons, are in deep underground bunkers that may withstand bombing before launch. Our President needs to get a briefing about what our options are and what might happen if we take them...

Since the end of the Korean War, in the 50's, we lacked the will to take on China during NK's development of nuclear capability. Our strategists were sure that China would defend NK militarily, as they did during the war...we'll never know...hopefully China still sees value in having a friendly buffer between it and SK, enough so to somehow de-escalate Un's behavior...
tailgater
9 years ago

We have reached an untenable position with North Korea...their leader seemingly is willing to sacrifice his nation while taking out millions of innocent people in SK, China and Japan. Their weapons delivery systems, including nuclear weapons, are in deep underground bunkers that may withstand bombing before launch. Our President needs to get a briefing about what our options are and what might happen if we take them...

Since the end of the Korean War, in the 50's, we lacked the will to take on China during NK's development of nuclear capability. Our strategists were sure that China would defend NK militarily, as they did during the war...we'll never know...hopefully China still sees value in having a friendly buffer between it and SK, enough so to somehow de-escalate Un's behavior...

delta1 wrote:



North Korea is only a threat because of what we haven't done.

And we can't form our foreign policy decisions over how that lunatic in charge will perceive it.

How friggin weak do you want the US to be?



delta1
9 years ago
How many lives, including friendly innocent civilians, are you willing to sacrifice to show our strength?
gummy jones
9 years ago
I guess a rephrase of the question is how many have already been lost and will continue to be lost in our weakness?

frankj1
9 years ago
trying to keep score for the last decade...

so now the right wants to be involved in a middle east war, right?
Abrignac
9 years ago

How many lives, including friendly innocent civilians, are you willing to sacrifice to show our strength?

delta1 wrote:




How many are you willing to sacrifice to ignore the obvious?
Abrignac
9 years ago

trying to keep score for the last decade...

so now the right wants to be involved in a middle east war, right?

frankj1 wrote:



Nah, bomb them into oblivion without putting boots on the ground. While we are at it, bomb the chit of their desert training camps.

Then we can go back to walking softly with a big stick.
ZRX1200
9 years ago
Frank.

We're still there.......
DrafterX
9 years ago
I've thought about this a little bit. .. how many troops would fight for fatty fat fat..?? I think at the first bombings they'd run for the hills. .. 😟
jjanecka
9 years ago

trying to keep score for the last decade...

so now the right wants to be involved in a middle east war, right?

frankj1 wrote:




Frank we've been in the Middle East since we pulled out of 'Nam.
frankj1
9 years ago

Frank.

We're still there.......

ZRX1200 wrote:


I think we are on the same page
frankj1
9 years ago

Frank we've been in the Middle East since we pulled out of 'Nam.

jjanecka wrote:


I think we are on the same page
tonygraz
9 years ago
Bob Seger time ?
Users browsing this topic