JadeRose
9 years ago

What tribe is that?

rfenst wrote:






Sukalottadeek
DrafterX
9 years ago
jjanecka
9 years ago
GOP never came unhinged over Obama... Alot of people thought he was gonna get assassinated because he is black but no one said that he should ever be assassinated. Huge difference.
RMAN4443
9 years ago

What tribe is that?

rfenst wrote:


The Wherethefukahwees..............There is a motorcycle club in NH that uses that name and patch
bgz
  • bgz
  • Herf-A-Holic
9 years ago

I like how you slipped the "2nd amendment friends will take care of Hillary" quote in there.

The actual quote is this:
"...Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish, the Second Amendment. By the way, and if she gets to pick --if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know. But I'll tell you what, that will be a horrible day, if -- if -- Hillary gets to put her judges in."


Unlike many of Trump's quotes, this doesn't need interpretation. But even a reasonable person would understand that Trump is saying that Hillary's Judges could never take their guns. Short of prying them from their dead fingers.

Holding onto your guns and being ready to fight to keep them is a far cry from shooting Hillary. Which is what you're insinuating.

Of course, the mainstream media told you that's what he meant.
Again.

tailgater wrote:




Those mainstream media people sound like a f'd up group.
delta1
9 years ago

I like how you slipped the "2nd amendment friends will take care of Hillary" quote in there.

The actual quote is this:
"...Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish, the Second Amendment. By the way, and if she gets to pick --if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know. But I'll tell you what, that will be a horrible day, if -- if -- Hillary gets to put her judges in."


Unlike many of Trump's quotes, this doesn't need interpretation. But even a reasonable person would understand that Trump is saying that Hillary's Judges could never take their guns. Short of prying them from their dead fingers.

Holding onto your guns and being ready to fight to keep them is a far cry from shooting Hillary. Which is what you're insinuating.

Of course, the mainstream media told you that's what he meant.
Again.

tailgater wrote:




You can interpret Trump however you like, tail, but Hillary has never said or done anything to abolish the Second Amendment, so he started with a provocative lie...which is not unusual for him...and there isn't a judge out there that is advocating abolishing the Second Amendment...another provocative lie...both lies intended to motivate hatred against Hillary among his supporters, one of whom may be a lunatic 2nd Amendment guy who may "do something"

Here's my interpretation, and I didn't need anyone to splain it to me: Trump is like a school yard bully telling the slow kids "that b*tch said she's gonna get a strong friend to stick a broom up all ya'alls azzes...gonna be terrible when that happens...unless someone does something..."
ZRX1200
9 years ago
I think we all know hill dog is a closet submissive for HUUUUUUUUUUMA.
SteveS
9 years ago

Those mainstream media people sound like a f'd up group.

bgz wrote:



Your impressions are accurate ...
Abrignac
9 years ago

You can interpret Trump however you like, tail, but Hillary has never said or done anything to abolish the Second Amendment, so he started with a provocative lie...which is not unusual for him...and there isn't a judge out there that is advocating abolishing the Second Amendment...another provocative lie...both lies intended to motivate hatred against Hillary among his supporters, one of whom may be a lunatic 2nd Amendment guy who may "do something"

Here's my interpretation, and I didn't need anyone to splain it to me: Trump is like a school yard bully telling the slow kids "that b*tch said she's gonna get a strong friend to stick a broom up all ya'alls azzes...gonna be terrible when that happens...unless someone does something..."

delta1 wrote:




Hillary has been on the forefront calling more gun control. Which if she gets her way, wouldn't that be same thing as abolishing the 2nd amendment. We also know Hillary makes no bones that she has public and private positions. Would her private position be more extreme than her public one?
SmokeMonkey
9 years ago

GOP never came unhinged over Obama...

jjanecka wrote:



Lol
DrafterX
9 years ago
Riots in da streets..,?? Celebritys calling for burning the White House and assassination..?? No, that didn't happen with Obama... 😟
Krazeehorse
9 years ago

Riots in da streets..,?? Celebritys calling for burning the White House and assassination..?? No, that didn't happen with Obama... 😟

DrafterX wrote:


And of course if that HAD happened it would have been because Obama's detractors were racists, not that they simply didn't like his policies.
DrafterX
9 years ago
True... true... 😟
DrMaddVibe
9 years ago
A talented actor...made many great movies and turned in great memorable scenes...now, living WAAAAY above his means and wants to torpedo his livelihood by likening himself to John Wilkes Booth? Way to line those pockets Johnny.
Buckwheat
9 years ago

Johnny Depp is an a$$wipe

SteveS wrote:



+1. And I could care less what any actor/musician/model/etc says on political issues. 🌫
delta1
9 years ago

Hillary has been on the forefront calling more gun control. Which if she gets her way, wouldn't that be same thing as abolishing the 2nd amendment. We also know Hillary makes no bones that she has public and private positions. Would her private position be more extreme than her public one?

Abrignac wrote:




definition ;...Abolish: formally put an end to (a system, practice, or institution).
synonyms: put an end to, get rid of, scrap, end, stop, terminate, ax, eradicate, eliminate, exterminate, destroy, annihilate, stamp out, obliterate, wipe out, extinguish, quash, expunge, extirpate;


I don't see "control" in there...so ...no abolish and control are not the same, except if you say it long enough some people will believe it...
DrMaddVibe
9 years ago

definition ;...Abolish: formally put an end to (a system, practice, or institution).
synonyms: put an end to, get rid of, scrap, end, stop, terminate, ax, eradicate, eliminate, exterminate, destroy, annihilate, stamp out, obliterate, wipe out, extinguish, quash, expunge, extirpate;


I don't see "control" in there...so ...no abolish and control are not the same, except if you say it long enough some people will believe it...

delta1 wrote:










That lying bitch demonizes the NRA because she needs a strawman to carry out her agenda. She's not pro-guns, pro 2nd Amendment nor is she advocating the use of having a gun for whatever reason.

Are you still carrying the water for that lying bitch? Seriously? Why are you invested in protecting whatever she wants you to say? America saw right through her. She's always been a liar and a sneak. ALWAYS. Thinking there's a shred of decency in her, her husband and their marriage is a fallacy that is easily picked apart by their own words, actions and deeds.

I'd pick someone worthy of devotion to serve than crooked Hillary. Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, Charlie Manson...anyone other than her. Starting with the Watergate hearings with her unethical behavior, to white water land deals, insider stock trading, backroom healthcare deals as First Lady, Benghazi, and her use of a private server as well as rigging an election should all serve as reminders as to why you should NEVER be some public arbitrator of a Clinton...EVER.
delta1
9 years ago
I watched all three, and did not hear her say she wanted to totally abolish the 2nd Amendment: she said she didn't think we should have weapons permit laws that allow people to openly carry military style assault weapons with high capacity clips (this on a web-site that can't spell IMPERIALIST); she spoke about other gun control measures like back-ground checks to prevent mentally disturbed people from buying guns....she spoke of limits and controls to the 2nd Amendment-not abolish...yet, in all three clips, narrators claim she wants to abolish guns...

I'm not a fan of Hillary... she is a politician who can't seem to connect with the average American. But false narratives from some opinion shaping biased pro/unlimited/unregulated 2nd Amendment is not persuasive. We may disagree with her proposals, but we can't extrapolate her ideas about rational gun control measures to mean a total abolishing of guns...

... Hillary was not a part of Watergate, no wrong-doing was found on her or Bubba's part in the White Water deal. Ted Bundy and John Wayne Gacy are deceased, but if alive, are DQ'ed from being President, as is Manson...

There are two sides to the 2nd Amendment: 1) a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, 2) the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. One can't say one part exists, but the other does not...
DrMaddVibe
9 years ago

I watched all three, and did not hear her say she wanted to totally abolish the 2nd Amendment: she said she didn't think we should have weapons permit laws that allow people to openly carry military style assault weapons with high capacity clips (this on a web-site that can't spell IMPERIALIST); she spoke about other gun control measures like back-ground checks to prevent mentally disturbed people from buying guns....she spoke of limits and controls to the 2nd Amendment-not abolish...yet, in all three clips, narrators claim she wants to abolish guns...

delta1 wrote:



As she obfuscates her answer in one, makes the NRA out to be a bad guy in an other and then bemoans how we shouldn't be allowed to open carry. Nice try. In open carry states, they enjoy less crime. The states with the tightest regulations have the most. What is your point again? What any politician should say is "We as a nation have enough laws on the books regarding guns, either we enforce them or we don't. Creating more isn't the issue." and be done. To me, anything less than that is a rubber stamp for repression and not adhering to the Constitution. Love what ya did with the mentally disturbed remark. Wouldn't that fall on whomever sold them the weapon? Seriously.


I'm not a fan of Hillary... she is a politician who can't seem to connect with the average American. But false narratives from some opinion shaping biased pro/unlimited/unregulated 2nd Amendment is not persuasive. We may disagree with her proposals, but we can't extrapolate her ideas about rational gun control measures to mean a total abolishing of guns...

delta1 wrote:



You sure seem to spend a lot of time here defending her, so I'm not buying that you're not a fan. The mere fact that she was willing to sidestep congress with healthcare initiatives is all I need to know about her intentions. She's a liar and cannot ever be trusted. With ANYTHING!

... Hillary was not a part of Watergate, no wrong-doing was found on her or Bubba's part in the White Water deal. Ted Bundy and John Wayne Gacy are deceased, but if alive, are DQ'ed from being President, as is Manson...

delta1 wrote:



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/925684/posts 
as far as whitewater goes...http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20010120/aponline104904_000.htm
and my point with the deranged killers is that convicted murderers and serial killers are better suited for your devotion than that crooked lying bitch. It had nothing to do with them ever being elected.[/b][/i]

There are two sides to the 2nd Amendment: 1) a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, 2) the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. One can't say one part exists, but the other does not...

delta1 wrote:



What constitutes a militia? Armed citizens. Understanding why the 2nd Amendment exists in the first place is key to your flawed thinking. Our Founding Fathers understood what a tyrannical government was like to live under. They put in place provisions for us to overthrow if necessary our own government. They did so with muskets and pitchforks. They wanted an even playing field with no advantage towards the military that defends America. As our military evolves so should the weaponry for citizens. Otherwise, the government can run rampant all over itself and set up a military state. Don't take my word for it though...just look at the nations that willingly gave up their weapons. It's not worked out for them...at all.
delta1
9 years ago
You didn't show me where she said abolish...that's a leap...Hillary bashing is fine, but you don't have to dive into the garbage heap of alternative facts to skewer her...

Just pointing out facts about "Hillary's Watergate scandal"... Hillary was a recent Yale law grad hired as a low-level staff member assisting the special legal team selected by Chair of the House Judiciary Comte Rodino and John Doar, head of the Judiciary Comte's special legal team(Hillary's boss then) in the House impeachment process during Watergate. She had no official public role. She was a spear chucker, and as such, couldn't or didn't do the things that Zeifman alleged, much later when politics motivated him to "make stuff up as red meat" for Clinton haters...

Zeifman was head of the legal counsel for the Judiciary committee, a separate body from the special legal team for Watergate. Many of Zeifman's claims were contradicted by public statements he made before and after he wrote his book about 14 years after the fact. He was never her supervisor...and he didn't say boo until Bubba was elected to the WH...talk about witch hunt...

I will not engage in a discussion about gun rights: it is pointless...I've wasted my breath too often ... there are enough data to support either side...but once one picks a side, there's no use arguing...black is blue and blue is chrome and chrome is pearl and pearl is woodgrain......
Users browsing this topic