yeah, I guess this is why I'm not understanding the game over dance. there's a long way to go on different issues at stake.

frankj1 wrote:

TW,
The DNC paid foreigners to provide false intel against Trump for the sole purpose of derailing the election.

That's collusion. By a foreign nation.
Sure they paid the Brits who worked with the Russians. But we've got that pesky thing called proof.

Before, it was just an accusation that Trump colluded with Russia to impact the election.

Now we have proof it was HRC colluding with British/Russians to impact the election.


I'll state it again. I really don't think it's a big deal that this was done.
But the left DID.
Only now it's their own team who stepped over the line.
So we'll hear how it's "no big deal" this time.
Because...Trump.

tailgater wrote:

All good lies have some truth.

Pathetic to think someone is OK with investigations and unmasking done based off of a fabricated report that was done by a FBI funded informant. And now the investigation is being done by the person that was in charge when that happened......if you don't see this for what it is you are a sad sad clown.

I hope heads roll and this is EXACTLY what a special prosecutor should be used for. Not the dossier, but the whole situation. The DNC/Hill dog may get fines for the dossier (was not claimed in the election forms as this was outside legal representation that's purpose wasn't named). Our government cannot work this way, it will not work this way.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Oh...the Debbie Wasserman-Shultz...the gift that keeps on giving...the water is starting to come to a boil!

Someone better watch her too...She'll prolly be found in a park after committing suicide with multiple gunshot wounds from a revolver!

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Actually tail I've always taken issue with the republicans or the dems (in this case both) paying ex or current brit intel agents for info. It's not illegal but sure rubs me wrong. I didn't realize this was new info to you. It's been pretty common knowledge to me for a long time. There is some more detail but I guess I (and anyone paying attention) already knew the gist of it.

I don't like it or condone it. It's slimy.

It also doesn't make what the Trump campaign is being accused of with the Russians any more ok legally or morally. It also doesn't change what is going on in that investigation in the least from which we still don't know the outcome. And while it is smelly, what the trump campaign is being accused of with the Russians.... rightly or wrongly is exponentially worse and potentially illegal. I'm guessing a few folks are going to jail on the russia thing but not on the dossier.

I'm not going to argue it because I don't know what the end result of the trump investigation is or if anything wrong even happened. Besides in here people don't want information, they want affirmation.

I agree the dossier funding is seedy and always has been. I've never liked it. I just cant get to where you are..... yet. It's not really new news and doesn't change much.

Newsflash... Hillary is a slimy cvnt and we are lucky she didn't get in to office. That doesn't change the fact Trump is a pile of **** and an embarrassment. Both can be true anywhere but in here.

teedubbya wrote:

TG, this is just a question. Where have you seen that the dossier is fake? I ask because I have not seen anything that shows the information is fake or real, but to be truthful I have not been following this.

Speyside wrote:

I'm not over looking anything here.

Investigate all. Dole out the pain on all deserving. Just don't pick and choose like you want to.

I say lock her up. WGAF. But none of that changes Trump's situation.

By the way we don't know what the investigators do or why they did what. I think we need to stay tuned unless we just decide to stop looking because you have enough to convince you.

teedubbya wrote: