He never colluded in the first place. Even if he did, someone had to do the job. Hillary would have meant WIII.
jjanecka wrote:
Whoa! "Even if he did...." ?????!!!!
Hey I know we're all entrenched on our personal political islands but we're still all Amercans, right??
We're talking RUSSIANS here!! Not big fans of democracies, ya know? These are the folks who brought you Stalin. And Russia, the country where 9 political leaders mysteriously died in the last 9 months, orders to murder reporters are common and opposition leader Navalny was just given a 20-day prison sentence for not shutting up.
Fake news is a high crime to the Kremlin. Reporters die. Guys like ex chess champ Kasparov has to leave Russia to escape persecution for his high crime of "free speech". Even he is amazed that they haven't killed him yet.
Ask Ukrainians about Russia. Ask the German people how the Russian army treated them after the war.
In an interview Trump defended Putin 'You think our country's so innocent?' Stupefying.
We're not innocent but ....Siberia? Mass graves?
Under no circumstances is it okay that they worked with Trump to get him elected.
And if he corroborated , LOCK HIM UP!,
If you were seriously looking towards a candidate that would avoid WW3 then how could you help elect a guy like Trump anyway? Donald actually enjoys taunting, insulting and egging on Kim Jong-un who we all know is hell bent on war.
Anyway, seems"collusion" is NOT a legal term except in the case of antitrust.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/12/what-is-collusion-215366 Whats the deal? Hillary's the real enemy? The Dems? Not the Russians?
That's nuts.
