The probe ends with no evidence of collusion.

Frank goes out on a limb and says "there may in fact end up being no collusion"

They getting to you my friend?
Overdue for a smoke?
Or you just tossing your hat in the ring for the Mr. Obvious award?

"Collusion?
Collusion is SOOOO 2017.

We don't care about no stinking collusion.
It never was really THAT important."

-Lefty Liberal

I'm actually glad they ended the investigation. They were not investigating just leaking. Both sides...both sides...


It wasn't a legitimate investigation and both sides are admitting that.

I have a looong record stating that collusion won't be the big ending after the dust settles, and that it won't be about specific votes related to tampering, but you don't mind if I wait for the non-fiction version of the investigation, do ya? HA!

You guys have been hanging your hats on "collusion" while agreeing with Trump that there's been no tampering as well.
With or without collusion, The Election was tampered with! why are righties relieved and not outraged? This is a yuuuge issue.

why is the right not pushing for implementation of sanctions? Answer: Bought and paid for influence, as I have been stating from day one. But that doesn't explain why the cigar guys aren't.

We don't yet know all the benefits Russia (and Ukraine) have acquired, how much policy influence they control or are owed. And even that collusion thingy isn't final just because a committee born with an agenda came through.

I've had a few smokes, but overdue to get together wif you.

It was a farce the moment Nunes, Trump's stooge, was ushered into the WH in the middle of the night to look at "confidential intel that proved Obama wire-tapped Trump Tower".

... the very same discredited sources that supposedly showed a nefarious scheme to "unmask" Trump campaign staff. The cons continue to run the narrative that "unmask" means to out someone for an unlawful purpose, and that the US intel community did so intentionally to hurt Trump. As applied to these docs, there was intel being gathered on foreign agents (Russian spies) that were known to be operating against U.S. interests. These foreign agents were discovered to be communicating with US citizens. These documents generally redact/black-out names of US citizens incidentally discovered. The "unmasking" was the request to reveal who these US citizens were, a reasonable response given the seriousness of the matter being investigated....


What the cons did to out Valerie Plame, in effort to sell the Iraq war...now that was a troublesome "unmasking"...

Richard Armitage is a con now? Are you even serious with that last sentence?

Novak, the journalist who wrote the story, confirmed he had two sources: Karl Rove and Richard Armitage. Both were members of the Bush administration. Armitage was the Deputy Secretary of State.

Interesting and truly disturbing that Putin and his hackers have a better understanding of our democracy than even we do.
And look how easy it is for them to sow discord among Americans.

Pretty adept. Here we all are either denying or declaring something that our intelligence agencies say happened while Putin is doubling down on our 2020 elections.

You have to admit, at very least, they're smarter than we are.

I heard that Trump has been in contact with the Russians to step up their efforts for the 2018 elections...