There's probably tons of bad ones. The pool of potential top candidates has to be incredibly hollowed out due to compensation. I'm not so sure about your clock, though. I would bet that (good?) teachers spend more time working when not on the clock than most professions. I suspect that they also spend a lot of their 'off' time, especially summers working on education and training, which many jobs make allowance for during clock time. Besides, do they get paid during the summer? IDK, but I doubt it. As to the question of bad teachers, what's your solution, if not better pay?
Its clear that evaluating teachers has been a tremendous challenge for all districts (partly complicated by unions and tenure, of course...what's the incentive to invest in quality evaluation systems when you can't fire them, anyway?)
dstieger wrote: