Let him, who is without sin... cast the first stone. 😁

And all of the other Presidents were sinless, eh?


🍺

bs_kwaj wrote:

I assume infidelity has never been his strong point. I think it's unbecoming. incredibly immoral. I also think its pretty common (unfortunately) in America and more so amongst celebrities and elites.

As far as the media and left's and never trump efforts to make it a really big deal - predictable. Anything to not give any credit for some of the legitimate accomplishments of this administration.

As less comes out of the Russia stuff we will hear more about this and whatever the next "outrage of the week" becomes.

gummy jones wrote:

Bang Bang Bang........that's hitting the nail on the head......Trump could cure cancer today and people with TDR would be outraged that it wasn't done last week

RMAN4443 wrote:

plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose. or something like that.

frankj1 wrote:

At least it wasn't a creepy age difference, it occurred before becoming POTUS, he paid for the service and not in the oval office.

Gene363 wrote:

not a creepy age difference, like with the playboy models?
I take comfort in knowing he's a higher level immoral creep.
Gene, I keed, I keed

but what has always stumped me is the staunch support from the Moral Right Wing. His "flaws" were well known prior to his campaign. None of this unsavory stuff should be a surprise, but should be scorned by the Holy Rollers.

frankj1 wrote:

There is no substantial "higher moral ground' in this comparison, there is a distinction between seducing a 22 year old intern and paying a professional sex worker.

Gene363 wrote:

paying a hooker is not what happened, unless she takes payments a decade later.

and we just learned today Trump actually did make the payment, not for services rendered, ...something I did not know at the time of my previous post.

frankj1 wrote:

Meh, tempest in a teacup.

Gene363 wrote:

reminds me of a post I wrote several years ago in which I said if Obama found a cure for cancer and it would cost one dollar per patient, Congress (at that time) would refuse to fund it.

frankj1 wrote:

oh, I am not in a state of disbelief, nor am I happy. I have more issues with far Right Wing religious zealots shrugging off this behavior that they would condemn a liberal for as sin.

for them, it didn't happen in office nor in the Oval Offfice, evidently a greater immorality than repeated infidelity followed by payoff/bribes to cover up followed by conspiring with an attorney to deny, a moral distinction made by these hypocrites.

I believe I know immoral behavior when I see it and he is a repeat offender...office holder or not.

These supporter have sold out.

frankj1 wrote: