We totally agree on that point. My question is why aren't those who are inelligable to purchase a firearm, attempt to make a purchase anyway, and lie on the 4470 form prosecuted? I just read that of the 67,000 who failed direct FBI background checks through NICS in '09, less then 70 where ever prosecuted. Why so few?
Let's change the infraction from an attempt to illegally purchase a firearm to drunk driving. 67,000 drivers are caught drunk driving in a year, yet less then 70 are prosecuted. So, instead of asking why 66,930 drunk drivers where not prosecuted, the media and the left's solution is to demand even more restrictive laws on the law abiding drivers. Could you imagine the outrage from drivers? Yet we allow this same scenario to play out when it comes to purchasing firearms, i.e. don't prosecute the offenders, but instead punish the law abiding. Why are not all law abiding gun owners screaming about this injustice?
David (dpnewell)
Mrs. dpnewell wrote: