IG Report · Page 2 · CigarBid Forums

Free Fall
Auctions

Specials
Auctions

QuickBuy
Auctions

Newly Added
Auctions

Ending Soon
Auctions

Welcome Guest

Forum Terms & Conditions | My Topics

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#21

And Obama obviously knew about Hillary's illegal server and emails... 😟

Speyside
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#22

I find 2 points quite interesting.

1) Strzok's email and associated emails.
2) Comey's double standard of publicly speaking about the email/server investigation which is not normal procedure, and not publicly speaking about the collusion investigation which is normal procedure.

To me both of these are daming.

DrafterX
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#23

Damn them..!! 😠

frankj1
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#24

This just released:

BarryS: why aren't you out campaigning??
Hillary: hung over..
BarryS: get off your fat ass..
Hillary: what about my emails..??
BarryS: your momma's emails..
Hillary: what if Trump finds out..??
BarryS: F Trump..

Film at 11... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

this is comic gold!
You have a beautiful mind, X.

frankj1
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#25

So now your argument has changed from "CNN analysts are giving a left slanted analysis of the report and I don't trust it" to " the report is biased because they're investigating themselves".

Whatever... Not worth my time

victor809 wrote:

it's only day one.
wait til I post what came in my copy of The Daily Worker today.

ZRX1200
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#26

I only read Mother Jones.

Speyside
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#27

I was sure you read Radix Journal.

tailgater
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#28

victor809 wrote:

If you think I made not one, but two opposing (or different) arguments then you are too sensitive.
I was just discussing the subject matter.
It's called a conversation.
Adults have them.
Google it.

frankj1
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#29

when/if I grow up...

victor809
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#30

I didn't say they are opposing.
You moved the goalpost... And now you moved it all the way over to "I wouldn't accept anything in that report anyway". At that point why would I bother having a conversation about the content of the report with you?

victor809
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#31

.... Let me rephrase. You moved it over to "I wouldn't accept anything in that report that doesn't math up with my preconcieved expectations that the FBI is biased against trump and has been allowing that to impact their investigation".... Because you clearly accept the reports information that some numbers of agents texted stuff that was political.

victor809
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#32

....math =match... Goddammit

Speyside
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#33

I don't know, I kind of like math up. Perhaps you just came up with a new catch phrase. Such as Tail, math up 1+1 is not 3 even though you think it is not. Or Tail, math up a U.S. federal inspector general (IG) is the head of an independent, non-partisan organization established within each executive branch agency assigned to audit the agency’s operation in order to discover and investigate cases of misconduct, waste, fraud and other abuse of government procedures occurring within the agency, even though you think an IG is not.

tailgater
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#34

victor809 wrote:

Glad this isn't worth your time.

LOL!

tailgater
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#35

victor809 wrote:

And for the record, I didn't say anything even remotely close to this.
This is quite literally a pure fabrication by you.

frankj1
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#36

great job, tail.

now "literal fabrication" will be the new buzzword for Slanders-Huckstery

thanks a pant load.

Mrs. dpnewell
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#37

^That statement sounds like a literal fabrication.

David

victor809
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#38

You said it with your eyes tail... You said it with your eyes.

Speyside
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#39

Nah, Sarah uses illiterate fabrications.

delta1
Herf-A-Holic

8 years ago

#40

What Hillary did was illegal.. what Comey did was illegal.. how was it correct not to prosecute..?? Because Comey didn't want to set a precedent..?? 😕

The SG will report on collusion soon..😟

DrafterX wrote:

Not sure if either actually violated a criminal law...violations of policies, procedures and best practices, for sure...

But other factors go into a decision to file criminal charges.... if either did violate a criminal law, is there substantial evidence of the violation...is there proof of criminal intent....all which the prosecutor must weigh and then decide whether there is proof beyond a reasonable doubt...

Most cons were convinced that Hillary violated some laws over Benghazi... after more than 2 years of exhausting investigation, led by a seasoned prosecutor, Trey Gowdy...zilch...and that was not a real criminal proceeding where the burden of proof is much higher... a "preponderance of the evidence" is much easier to reach than "beyond a reasonable doubt"

Again...if Hillary and Comey violated any criminal laws...Jeff Sessions, a Republican, is the AG...don't know why the cons aren't pressuring him to prosecute...

Edited by user 8 years ago | Reason: Not specified

Users browsing this topic

Important Information: