victor809
7 years ago
All the people whining about obama becoming a dictator or "king"?

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/03/trump-says-absolutely-moving-forward-with-census-citizenship-question.html 

trumpenfurher now says he will defy the Supreme Court (which is already a conservative court thanks to mconnel's completely anti-american screwing around) and put the "citizenship question" in the census.

DrafterX
7 years ago
Why shouldn't it be there..?? 😟
victor809
7 years ago

Why shouldn't it be there..?? 😟

DrafterX wrote:



A dumb irrelevant question.

The supreme court said it cannot be there. Doesn't matter why.
dstieger
7 years ago

Why shouldn't it be there..?? 😟

DrafterX wrote:


http://www.cigarbid.com/Forum/c/posts/659513/Dont-put-off-using-the-BleachBit-folks 

I was with you, Drafter...up until that news came out.

Pretty sure the Supreme Court was saying the same thing....."you GOP guys sorta fd yourself when you didn't destroy the evidence"
DrafterX
7 years ago
Fine... Let's just work harder to deport them then... 😟
delta1
7 years ago
I don't think they're going to defy the SCOTUS, who basically reamed them for lying in their argument about the purpose of the citizenship question, using a polite term: "contrived"...
DrafterX
7 years ago
So, if it can't be on the official form why not just have a second form..?? 🤔
victor809
7 years ago

Fine... Let's just work harder to deport them then... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



Also irrelevant.

Focus drafter.

The question is.... the supreme court of the US has told the administration not to do something (the something is irrelevant)
The idiotic potus is now saying he will do it, and doesn't care what the supreme court says.

Are you ok with this?
dstieger
7 years ago

Why shouldn't it be there..?? 😟

DrafterX wrote:




It isn't there now. Maybe a more important question is 'Why add it?"

If the census is about districting and representation, what would/should the government do with information gleaned from such a question?

If the census isn't about representation, why does Constitution require it at all? Would have been nice if the founding fathers specified 'count the citizens' or 'count every single living human'.......if someone can find a way to drive inanity into current politics by looking for loopholes in the Constitution, they're going to do it
DrafterX
7 years ago
But should someone here illegally get equal representation..?? 😟
dstieger
7 years ago

But should someone here illegally get equal representation..?? 😟

DrafterX wrote:




Is the answer to that a matter of opinion?


Or does the Constitution or Federal Law address it?

If the question were added, would you ONLY count the people who claimed to be citizens when you determine districts? I don't know how it was going to be used....just thinking out loud
victor809
7 years ago
yo.... noobs (dstieg and drafter)... wrong thread.
This is not to discuss whether the RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT is correct or not.
It's to discuss the fact that the idiotic potus is saying he will ignore THE RULING OF THE SUPREME COURT.

go dredge up one of the other threads if you want to dig into whether the ruling is correct.
DrafterX
7 years ago

Also irrelevant.

Focus drafter.

The question is.... the supreme court of the US has told the administration not to do something (the something is irrelevant)
The idiotic potus is now saying he will do it, and doesn't care what the supreme court says.

Are you ok with this?

victor809 wrote:



We all the court will look at it differently after Ginsberg is gone.... will Trump be wrong then..?? 😟
victor809
7 years ago
.... That's... a really dumb question.
I honestly don't know how you could ask something so dumb....

I mean, the layers of dumb are astounding.
First... you assume (incorrectly) that conservative appointed judges supported the question.
Second... .you fail to understand that the court doesn't re-hear the same case just because the judges changed....
Third... you fail to understand how time works....
opelmanta1900
7 years ago
I know you are but what am I...
dstieger
7 years ago
Who died and anointed Victor 'Minotaur'?

I've already said on multiple other issues that it is foolhardy to get outraged because Trump considered or said something....

I don't even know what all has been said today...but, I would bet that tomorrow or the next day we'll find that Trump said he wants the question on there....or that legal avenues should continue to be investigated....or something else far more ambiguous than ordering the Census Bureau violate a Supreme Court decision
DrafterX
7 years ago

.... That's... a really dumb question.
I honestly don't know how you could ask something so dumb....

I mean, the layers of dumb are astounding.
First... you assume (incorrectly) that conservative appointed judges supported the question.
Second... .you fail to understand that the court doesn't re-hear the same case just because the judges changed....
Third... you fail to understand how time works....

victor809 wrote:




I was trying... 🤣
RMAN4443
7 years ago
That's the good thing about being president, I can do whatever I want-Barack Obama



https://www.dailysignal.com/2014/02/14/7-times-obama-ignored-law-impose-executive-will/ 
RMAN4443
7 years ago

I was trying... 🤣

DrafterX wrote:


Good job...but you should listen to Mr. Clavin, he says he's really really smart
victor809
7 years ago

Who died and anointed Victor 'Minotaur'?

I've already said on multiple other issues that it is foolhardy to get outraged because Trump considered or said something....

I don't even know what all has been said today...but, I would bet that tomorrow or the next day we'll find that Trump said he wants the question on there....or that legal avenues should continue to be investigated....or something else far more ambiguous than ordering the Census Bureau violate a Supreme Court decision

dstieger wrote:



Now that's a valid possibility. He may just be lying. Or he may just be a confused old man who is waiting for his pudding.
Users browsing this topic