That's the good thing about being president, I can do whatever I want-Barack Obama

RMAN4443 wrote:

Absolutely none of which are even close to equivalent to defying the supreme court.

victor809 wrote:

I stayed on topic...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

...I hate you both....

victor809 wrote:

pretty clear in the Constitution...and as practiced for decades when doing the census...count every person...gotta admire the GOP, they keep coming up with all kindsa stuff to maintain their grip on power...mostly wrong, immoral, or illegal and un-Consitutional

delta1 wrote:

That's sort of what I'm getting at.

You're right... he hasn't done anything yet.

But he's saying he will....

do we accept that the moronic potus is a habitual liar?
Or do we assume that he's telling the truth and intends to defy the supreme court?

victor809 wrote:

Let's not consider the motives of the GOP or the Dems for a minute.

Isn't the whole point of the census to count and categorize every person?
In each and every category? Why would we omit any category?

izonfire wrote:

You mean like 'gay' and 'atheist'? I hear ya... Way easier to round them up if we know where they are...

opelmanta1900 wrote:

Al....you start out like you want to have a conversation...and then....

Q. Do you think that Congressional districting, funds apportionment, and other things that census numbers are used for should be based on totals including illegal immigrants? Yes or no.

I get that a 'yes' could be a valid opinion, but I disagree with it. I think the answer should be 'no', and thus support knowing how many of a given population are here illegally. I do think the question could be substantiated....despite the ill-intent of some.

I think just as nasty a case could be made for left leaning operatives wanting to ensure that illegals are counted, not for apportionment of services, but simply for increased seats....no better, I think

dstieger wrote: