Speyside
7 years ago
Z, no I'm not. Why?
teedubbya
7 years ago
its always about penetration with Z
Speyside
7 years ago
Remmington reduced recoil 8 pellet.
DrafterX
7 years ago
I'm not depraved... 🤐
RMAN4443
7 years ago

I'm not depraved... [-(

DrafterX wrote:


maybe just a little...8-[
teedubbya
7 years ago
or a lot.. ive been in his head... I know
dstieger
7 years ago

I'm not depraved... [-(

DrafterX wrote:




Prolly not...pretty sure you'd have to have been praved at some point prior
MACS
7 years ago
Put the perpetrators of these crimes on live tv... and put them to death by firing squad. No head shots.

It will stop.

But no, we'll sentence them to life without parole and pay for them to live their lives.

DrafterX
7 years ago
No way man... [-(

TW says it hurt the first few times... 😟
dstieger
7 years ago
Contracted, private prison workers' lives matter, too.
ZRX1200
7 years ago
Good choice Spey.....

TW sometimes it’s secondary penetration
ZRX1200
7 years ago
Good choice Spey.....

TW sometimes it’s secondary penetration
tailgater
7 years ago
I agree that there are already too many laws that aren't enforced.
And a background check might even be redundant in most areas.

But that's even more reason for the GOP to acquiesce. There is nothing truly lost, and so much that can be gained.

Settle things down, and then discuss the problem with open minds from both sides.

DrafterX
7 years ago
There are no open minds... everybody wants to be the somebody that forced Trump into a corner and made him do something... 😟
tailgater
7 years ago

There are no open minds... everybody wants to be the somebody that forced Trump into a corner and made him do something... 😟

DrafterX wrote:



Sounds like prison sex.

Or a post rugby celebration.


ZRX1200
7 years ago
No it’s not more reason to acquiesce because the far left is changing the goal posts in a game of triangulation......when you play along with childish reactionaryism you’re setting precedent to KEEP DOING IT. That’s precisely the point......the public is being conditioned into acquiescence do you really not see that forest through the trees???

You’re advocating giving a child a candy bar for misbehavior.
CelticBomber
7 years ago
We force people to see Psychiatrists for things like court and I also believe for getting on many government programs if you're claiming some sort of mental issue like depression also with cops who've been in a life or death situation. We do it for all kinds of reasons like I had to see one as part of getting my clearance (Special Category above Top Secret) in the Air Force. I could see things and enter vault's not even my commander had clearance for. It was super cool:-) I have no problem with doing the same thing with gun owners or making them report if anyone living in their home has mental issue's.

But, going after so called "Assault" weapons won't do a thing. Most gun deaths are caused by hand guns and you can get magazine's that hold just as many as an assault rifle. It's one pull of the trigger for one bullet with both hand guns and assault rifle's. It's easier to conceal more hand guns on you than an assault rifle. I "think" not actually sure that the only real difference is the range you can get with certain type's of ammunition for assault rifle's mixed with the length of their barrel. This whole argument is one big distraction so that people on both sides of the aisle can point at each other as they blame each other for nothing getting done. This is not a gun issue. It's a mental health issue and an issue of rhetoric getting out of hand on both sides which is mostly lies designed to scare or embolden the general population.A Congressman or Senator saying during an interview that at least with hand guns you have to pull the trigger for each bullet, implying that that's not the case for assault weapons and no one, on either side, bothers to say "Sorry but that's just not true!". This guy gets a say in the new laws that will try to be bulldozed through. That's what scares me.
ZRX1200
7 years ago
Clearance for a job is not the same as exercising a constitutional right.
Mr. Jones
7 years ago
I say pass a FEDERAL law that REQUIRES ALL POLICE TO SHOOT AND KILL A.L.L. ACTIVE SHOOTERS...P.E.R.I.O.D.

TAKE NO PRISONERS, they do not deserve a trial or
years on the taxpayerS dime in jail or getting free legal protection by pro bono appointed lawyers.

Background checks are fine already accept for the gun show loophole...this will kill all " flea mkt" purchases of long guns which really sucks in my opinion...guns at flea mkt in Pennsylvania has been almost a birthright and almost zero assault rifles show up there...it is always .22's , shotguns or deer rifles...

The Red Flag law is way to easy in some states allready...

Make it a federal felony to report anyone falsely or maliciously PUNISHABLE with a first degree FELONY CHARGE AND A 10 YEAR MINIMUM SENTENCE these kind of incorrect and false accusations...NIP THAT CRAP IN THE BUD before it turns into anonymous crime tip phone calls being 100% believed by the cops without DUE PROCESS.
tailgater
7 years ago

No it’s not more reason to acquiesce because the far left is changing the goal posts in a game of triangulation......when you play along with childish reactionaryism you’re setting precedent to KEEP DOING IT. That’s precisely the point......the public is being conditioned into acquiescence do you really not see that forest through the trees???

You’re advocating giving a child a candy bar for misbehavior.

ZRX1200 wrote:



I hear ya, man.
But if an olive branch can be passed to appease the masses, and it doesn't REALLY make things more restrictive but simply defines laws that probably already exist, then what is lost?

There are times that a candy bar is the right choice.
Users browsing this topic