Yeah, let's wait until it's close to really happening before anyone says anything about it. Gotta pass it before we know what's in it.

NINE! teen.

BuckyB93 wrote:

I'm sorry. I was focused on the OP not the other nonsense. The OP was on Biden ordering a study which is what I commented on originally and you jumped to nonsensical house bills. And you quoted me.






Funny you went off the rails and accused me of such. Try to follow along. I was making fun of your left turn but it's no fun when you are not smart enough to follow.

teedubbya wrote:

By the way the house bill is dead and not relevant.

teedubbya wrote:

Riiiiiight. Whatever Mrs. Fauci!

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Yes. I always wear white.

teedubbya wrote:

I know. That is why I pretend. I want to make it look like I can keep up with folks that know so much more than I do.

teedubbya wrote:

cons get outraged when libs push back against something outrageously done by the GOP...

think Merrick Garland...Amy Comey Barrett...


it's as if the GOP rules of politics are do as we say, not as we do...I think both sides should do whatever they think they can accomplish if/when they have the legitimate power to do so...that was the con rationale for doing so...

the days of moderation, cooperation, compromise and bipartisanship seem to have gone the way of the dodo


9 is not a number written in stone for the size of the court ...that has varied from 5 - 10 ...

nor is "lifetime appointment" a steadfast rule...

delta1 wrote:

It's a bonehead idea... 😟

DrafterX wrote: