Iffn the Chiefs get to Hurts like the Eagles got to Purdy it could be a whole different ball game.:-k

deadeyedick wrote:

Iffn the Chiefs get to Hurts like the Eagles got to Purdy it could be a whole different ball game.:-k

deadeyedick wrote:

I predict riots in Philly... win or lose.. 😟

DrafterX wrote:

I predict riots in Philly... win or lose.. 😟

DrafterX wrote:

Hoping Philly gets even more money heavy and it keeps driving that spread.

I'm waiting to drop my bet til the day before the game,taking KC and the points

Whistlebritches wrote:

I dropped a small play on KC +120 moneyline.

Something tells me that with 2 weeks to prepare, Andy Reid will come up with something that Eagles DC, Gannon, won't have seen before and have to come up with adjusts on the fly. Likewise, KC DC Spagnuolo will have something up his sleeve too.

Palama wrote:

Winnah, winnah! Pork ribs and boneless short ribs for dinner!

Great game! Too bad somebody had to lose.

Palama wrote:

^They showed the replay. At the initial cut he did grab a handful of jersey and that slowed the receiver enough that he couldn't get to where the ball was. Had he not held, it likely would have been a TD which, ironically, would have been better for the Eagles. They'd have had about 1:45 and a timeout to drive for the tie and OT.

Because of the auto first down... they smartly ran the clock and kicked.

Anyone that complained about it is drinking homer kool aid.

MACS wrote:

RE: The call.

It was holding.
Saying it "shouldn't be called in that situation" is counter to the existence of the rules themselves. A hold in minute one is the same as a hold in minute 59.

However, one could argue that the refs weren't calling it that tight all night. They were "letting them play", as they say.

But I don't hear that kind of talk. I hear whining about a correct call.
If all you philly phans are gonna whine, at least be accurate.

No wonder everyone was rooting for KC.

tailgater wrote: