Whoosh - that’s the sound of something going right over your head.
Once again, she was selected. But, the question remains. What has she ACTUALLY done to warrant that selection? Remember that Obama was given a Nobel not for what he had done at the time, but because he represented HOPE and CHANGE.
The year she was selected a number of other Indian born persons were also selected. So was she selected because she actually did something or was she selected because she was an Indian-born female politician that may or may not have already promoted an agenda or that maybe she would someday in the future?
Or was she selected as a preemptive strike against her because this organization felt she could be a leader who would not conform to their agenda and thus they sought weaken her politically?
Abrignac wrote: