Abrignac
2 years ago

Judaism began before the Jews were enslaved by the Egyptians.

rfenst wrote:





Abrahm> Issac> Jacob...

Judaism began before the Jews were enslaved by the Egyptians.

Also: "The biblical patriarch Isaac is recognized as a prophet of God by Muslims. As in Judaism and Christianity, Islam maintains that Isaac was the son of the patriarch and prophet Abraham from his wife Sarah."

rfenst wrote:




I don’t disagree with either. On the other hand I do believe to a certain degree that organized religion, regardless of dogma, is for the most part self-servant and has been used as a crutch throughout history to justify atrocities. A few examples that come to mind would be the crusades, the inquisition and the Canaanite genocide.
8trackdisco
2 years ago

Not impossible. But, Jewish lore was that it was written by Moses.

I am just leading with the the arguments that I believe support my position best to the greatest audience possible.

rfenst wrote:



Old Testament vs Torah.
How are they similar/different?
8trackdisco
2 years ago
Here’s a non PC question for those who don’t support Israel’s right to exist or Jews in general. Anybody that looks at them anywhere in the range of Meh to full on anti-semites.

If you want the Jewish state to fail, and get the Jews out of Israel, where exactly do you want them to go?

The ironic redneck answer might be “back where they came from”. But seriously?
frankj1
2 years ago

Old Testament vs Torah.
How are they similar/different?

8trackdisco wrote:


virtually one and the same...The Five Books of Moses, laws and the way to live, lots of stuff that many Jews look at simply as their history...some later religions may have shifted the order of them but the five books are still the same, commencing with Genesis.

In my Hebrew School, the way we were taught Hebrew initially was learning the Hebrew alphabet and then once able to read it, translating what is commonly called The Old Testament...first from ancient Hebrew to contemporary Hebrew and English.

The first few words we learned were "In the beginning..."
So essentially they combined language, history and religion into one curriculum.
Abrignac
2 years ago

Here’s a non PC question for those who don’t support Israel’s right to exist or Jews in general. Anybody that looks at them anywhere in the range of Meh to full on anti-semites.

If you want the Jewish state to fail, and get the Jews out of Israel, where exactly do you want them to go?

The ironic redneck answer might be “back where they came from”. But seriously?

8trackdisco wrote:



It sure who if anyone specifically this is addressed to but IMO Isreal has as much a right to exist as any other nation. No more, no less.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
2 years ago

I think, though the above is true, the Arabs are thought to descend from Abraham (Abram at the time) through a son named Ishmael, born to Sarah's handmaiden Hagar as Sarah was thought to be past the age of fertility
...yadda yadda yadda...
but then Sarah did conceive and that son was Isaac (Yitzhak), Hagar and Ishmael were eventually cast out and Ishmael became the father of Arabs which eventually produced Mohammed who founded the Islamic religion...

or so I heard.

frankj1 wrote:


Yes, as the story goes...
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
2 years ago

Old Testament vs Torah.
How are they similar/different?

8trackdisco wrote:


"Old Testament" is a Christian perspective/translation of the "First Five Books" often in English- The Torah is written in complex Hebrew and is interpreted from a Judaic perspective.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
2 years ago

... The first few words we learned were "In the beginning..."
So essentially they combined language, history and religion into one curriculum.

frankj1 wrote:


"
Beresheit

(בְּרֵאשִׁית‎—Hebrew for "in beginning" or "in the beginning," is the first word of Genesis.




(amended to an alternative spelling)
frankj1
2 years ago

"
Bere****

(בְּרֵאשִׁית‎—Hebrew for "in beginning" or "in the beginning," is the first word of Genesis.

rfenst wrote:


exactly.
so the answer to Russ's question is that what others call The Old Testament we call the Torah...both are the Five Books of Moses, or The Hebrew Bible.

I have jokingly called it The Prequel on many occasions here.
frankj1
2 years ago
Robert, had you used the original pronunciation of that Hebrew word, Bereshis, it would not have been ***ed out.
Several letters from the Hebrew alphabet had duplicate sounds and a few alterations were made after I finished Hebrew school.
DrafterX
2 years ago
Are there separate Shebrew schools for da wimmens..?? 😕
frankj1
2 years ago
William!!!
Soooo underappreciated.
MACS
2 years ago

exactly.
so the answer to Russ's question is that what others call The Old Testament we call the Torah...both are the Five Books of Moses, or The Hebrew Bible.

I have jokingly called it The Prequel on many occasions here.

frankj1 wrote:



Indeed you have. And I think rightly so... as it foreshadows Jesus' coming several times.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
2 years ago

Indeed you have. And I think rightly so... as it foreshadows Jesus' coming several times.

MACS wrote:


That is purely a matter of interpretation.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
2 years ago

Robert, had you used the original pronunciation of that Hebrew word, Bereshis, it would not have been ***ed out.
Several letters from the Hebrew alphabet had duplicate sounds and a few alterations were made after I finished Hebrew school.

frankj1 wrote:


Yes. There are many transliterations of the word plus pronunciation differences based on both- Bereshis or B-t -are appropriate based on where one's ancestry, among other things.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
2 years ago

Indeed you have. And I think rightly so... as it foreshadows Jesus' coming several times.

MACS wrote:


Come to think of it, do you therefore consider it to be divine?
Speyside2
2 years ago
This thread has taken a thoughtful, questioning turn. I like that. Are Bereshis and B-T from different historical timeframes, or just regionally different from the same historical timeframe?
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
2 years ago

This thread has taken a thoughtful, questioning turn. I like that. Are Bereshis and B-T from different historical timeframes, or just regionally different from the same historical timeframe?

Speyside2 wrote:


Historic: regional vs. ethnic vs. Sect vs. Ashkenazi vs. Sephardic....
BTW, I am going to Lakewood, NJ next week to stay with my brother and his family for four full days. 😣
Look it up!
jeebling
2 years ago
Hi Robert, I just wanted to say that I can understand why you or anyone would conclude that genocide is occurring in Palestine. I take you at your word that you’re not a far left progressive ideologue. Personally, I don’t think Israel is pursuing genocide. I believe the reports I’ve read and heard about the painstaking precautions the IDF is taking to avoid civilian casualties. I also believe that the IDF knows civilian casualties will be very high. I further believe that Hamas will do everything to ensure that Palestinian civilian casualties will be high. We know Israel drops the leaflets and sends out warnings on the cell phones. We know that Hamas is under ground, literally not figuratively, when the IDF announces the attacks. We know Hamas uses civilians and schools / hospitals as human shields for Hamas combatants. Still, the IDF is accepting that innocent civilians will be killed in large numbers. That, to my thinking anyway, is ruthless warfare but not genocide. So, I’m not saying you’re wrong. I’m saying that I see it differently.
Regarding 1948, Israel has been recognized by the UN as a legitimate nation since then. Any discussion about drawing a map based on legal agreements prior to that date is a non-starter as far as I can tell. By what authority would they do that? The lands that Israel has occupied has been the result of combat in retaliation to attacks from hostile neighbors such as Hamas. Israel thinks it needs to occupy these lands for national sovereignty and defense. Should they simply give the land back as if they were never attacked? Never in a defensive war in these lands? I don’t think that is reasonable or logical. I think this is the result of bad diplomacy and decision making on the part of Hamas and other anti-Israel groups. Harsh as it is, it is a f/%k around find out situation. Again, just my opinion.
As far as your claim that Israel is only interested in land and energy resources, I don’t see any discussion or support for your claim. I believe Israel would be happier to have peace without the resources in question because they have a thriving economy and it would be cheaper to buy the gas than to fight for it and defend it.
This is how I see it. It’s difficult to make a point in such a constrained message. I hope I’ve said enough to express some reasons for my opinions. Thanks for sharing yours.
rfenst
  • rfenst
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
2 years ago
@ #99

Your replying to Hively, right?
Users browsing this topic