For Context's Sake...put THAT disclaimer up. You see me do it with almost every Political post. It kinda changes the whole...message...meaning...understanding.

Take care.

🇨🇮

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Withholding weapons from Israel is a massive betrayal. Anyone or group that is pro-Hamas by definition is a threat to us. War is war and Hamas started this war that Israel will finish. Any Democrat, who is not a Jihadist, should be ashamed or this. Actually, any person who has a moral compas should be ashamed of this. I get why Biden is doing this, to win Michigan. I would prefer he would lose the election and stand tall on helping Israel, our friend and ally end this. If they want to convict Bibi of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and whatever else they can Trump so be it. This is a war; you do not play by the Marquis De Queensberry rules. You play by the Marquis De Sade rules.

Speyside2 wrote:

While I fervently support Israel, I am an American First- by far.

I am going to do some research on the Presidential power to do this when he signed the passed joint bill. I wonder if there is precedent/history.

I think the bill was intended solely for the exact reason to immediately deliver the withheld armaments. This may be a constitutional conflict moment...

rfenst wrote:

Slim Slap- kind of?

rfenst wrote:

Am I right in concluding that, basically, Biden is saying that some hamas supporters are " very fine people? "

Stogie1020 wrote:

Attention all Jews here:
In addition to 9M foreign invaders that are bankrupting
municipal agencies and raising crime rates thanks to Biden and Mayorkas
now Biden is pandering to the Dearborn muslim vote, that he sorely needs, proposing
to bring Hamas to the US under refugee status AKA free housing,health benefits etc and eventual citizenship.
Yes the Hamas that were polled and answered in the affirmative
to the following questions:
Hamas should return to Gaza 59%
Agree with Oct7th massacre 71%
Hamas not committed war 83%
crimes.

And not a word on the US hostages!

MaduroJorge wrote:

Pedo Joe hasn't uttered a single American captive name.

He's not sending anyone to rescue anybody.

Remember the surrender in Afghanistan?

Yeah.

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Forget Afghanistan. This is worse.
May be violation of constitutional, presidential authority by history or the exact contents of the bill.
Ever wonder if we even have the munitions they need?

rfenst wrote:

Robert, would this be a direct violation of the 14th amendment section 3? Here is what I see. Or as any officer of the United States. This would cover the president, I think. Or given aid or comfort to the to the enemies thereof.

I think this is exactly what Biden is doing but I certainly know very little about law and constitutional interpretation.

Speyside2 wrote: