because autocorrect is liberal and Sammy was, well, you know.
frankj1 wrote:
Not quite Y.E.T. !!!BOO BOO !!!RAY R JUST STEPPED INTO A TIMD PORTALand is going all " Kurt russell" on us !!!Like that movie with Egyptians and flying pyramids...It escapes my NON PREVIGEN NUERAL MATTER AT THE MOMENT..
Mr. Jones wrote:
Who ? Says I did??Mr. STARGATE( SNAKE PLISKIN BOYEEEEEE)SCJ Thomas pubic hair's actions in no way compare to some 1861 SJC writing an opinion???WTF?Pubic coke can hair boy is JUST LIVIN L.A.R.G.E. OFF A BILLIONAIRES COIN / BRIBE...THAT IS NOT TREASONOUS...ITS JUST W.R.O.N.G. AND ILLEGAL...if it isn't? It should be...
Not illegal. We've covered this over and over again.
DrMaddVibe wrote:
So now we are back to Clarence Thomas is bad optics for Conservatives.
HockeyDad wrote:
true...maybe. but even if true it's not a question of if it's a crime.it only requires "the appearance of impropriety", something else that we've covered ad nauseum.yes yes yes we know he's not the only one...
So now we are back to Clarence Thomas is bad optics for the Democrats. That’s what I’ve been saying. Anyway….Happy Juneteenth!
Finally, yes!Ironically, The GOP has been trying to make the politicizing of the court as an election issue, and now it actually is, but for the other guys.Be careful what you wish for.
...it only requires "the appearance of impropriety", something else that we've covered ad nauseum.
Like 20 pass through companies when you don’t have an actual product/business other than influence?
ZRX1200 wrote:
The CigarBid Forums uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close
