drglnc
  • drglnc
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago
Allan Lichtman, the historian who has correctly predicted the outcome of 9 out of the 10 most recent presidential elections, has made his Prediction on who will reclaim the White House this year.

Spoiler alert: it’s Vice President Kamala Harris.

Based on thirteen keys or “big picture true-false questions that tap into the strength and performance of the White House Party.” - He did add a caveat that this prediction is subjected to change with any major scandals for Harris or Major negative down swings in the current economy.

The 13 Keys

1 Party mandate After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than after the previous midterm elections.
2 No primary contest There is no serious contest for the incumbent party nomination.
3 Incumbent seeking re-election The incumbent party candidate is the sitting president.
4 No third party There is no significant third party or independent campaign.
5 Strong short-term economy The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.
6 Strong long-term economy Real per capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms.
7 Major policy change The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy.
8 No social unrest There is no sustained social unrest during the term.
9 No scandal The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal.
10 No foreign or military failure The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
11 Major foreign or military success The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.
12 Charismatic incumbent The incumbent party candidate is charismatic or a national hero.
13 Uncharismatic challenger The challenging party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero.
DrMaddVibe
a year ago
There you have it.

You don't even have to show up to vote.

You already won!
RayR
a year ago
I heard he's kind of a WEIRD LEFTY NERD that has keys.

Allan Lichtman's "13 Keys To The White House" System Predicts Kamala Harris Victory

Posted By Tim Hains
On Date September 5, 2024

American University history professor Allan Lichtman finally reveals his prediction for the 2024 election. He says Kamala Haris is going to win, concluding that there has been no major scandal in the Biden administration and that Donald Trump is not charismatic.

His system of "13 keys" has predicted almost every presidential election going back to the 1980s.

His comment on how the 13 keys turn this time (false favors Trump, true favors Kamala Harris and the Democrats keeping the White House):

MORE:

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/09/05/allan_lichtmans_13_keys_to_the_white_house_predicts_kamala_harris_victory.html 

drglnc
  • drglnc
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago

I heard he's kind of a WEIRD LEFTY NERD that has keys.

Allan Lichtman's "13 Keys To The White House" System Predicts Kamala Harris Victory

Posted By Tim Hains
On Date September 5, 2024

RayR wrote:



He didn't actually say Trump is not Charismatic... at least not in the vid i watched of him explaining the keys for this election. He said that Trumps version of charisma only appeals to a "narrow base" of voters.

the Keys report out at 5 for trump and 8 for Harris - 4 of these (or at least the perception of who they apply to) would need to flip in the next 60 days to change his prediction.

I actually think it is closer as i think a couple could flip depending on how the GOP can get certain points across and how some of these keys are viewed by the undecideds.

I found it interesting that the Third Party key since RFK dropped hurts trump in this situation.


he has a 90% pass rating on his predictions thus far... pretty hard to argue with those numbers



Brewha
a year ago

Allan Lichtman, the historian who has correctly predicted the outcome of 9 out of the 10 most recent presidential elections, has made his Prediction on who will reclaim the White House this year.

Spoiler alert: it’s Vice President Kamala Harris.

drglnc wrote:









So......America isn't going to be great again? 😱
HockeyDad
a year ago

So......America isn't going to be great again? 😱

Brewha wrote:



Nope, America isn’t going to be great again.
MACS
a year ago
Well... when the fix is in, it's easy to predict, gonna be a lot of folks watching real close this time.
Brewha
a year ago

Nope, America isn’t going to be great again.

HockeyDad wrote:



Kewl! 🇨🇮
drglnc
  • drglnc
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago

Well... when the fix is in, it's easy to predict, gonna be a lot of folks watching real close this time.

MACS wrote:




Cant wait for that "evidence" that trump and rudypoo promised for the last 4 years...
jeebling
a year ago

Allan Lichtman, the historian who has correctly predicted the outcome of 9 out of the 10 most recent presidential elections, has made his Prediction on who will reclaim the White House this year.

Spoiler alert: it’s Vice President Kamala Harris.

Based on thirteen keys or “big picture true-false questions that tap into the strength and performance of the White House Party.” - He did add a caveat that this prediction is subjected to change with any major scandals for Harris or Major negative down swings in the current economy.

The 13 Keys

1 Party mandate After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than after the previous midterm elections.
2 No primary contest There is no serious contest for the incumbent party nomination.
3 Incumbent seeking re-election The incumbent party candidate is the sitting president.
4 No third party There is no significant third party or independent campaign.
5 Strong short-term economy The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.
6 Strong long-term economy Real per capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms.
7 Major policy change The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy.
8 No social unrest There is no sustained social unrest during the term.
9 No scandal The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal.
10 No foreign or military failure The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
11 Major foreign or military success The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.
12 Charismatic incumbent The incumbent party candidate is charismatic or a national hero.
13 Uncharismatic challenger The challenging party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero.

drglnc wrote:




10, 11, and 12 doesn’t seem to be in Harris’ favor. A few others are debatable opinion but 10, 11, 12 seem to be working against Harris. I’m not trying to be “political” or biased.
drglnc
  • drglnc
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago

10, 11, and 12 doesn’t seem to be in Harris’ favor. A few others are debatable opinion but 10, 11, 12 seem to be working against Harris. I’m not trying to be “political” or biased.

jeebling wrote:



he (and i) acknowledge that it could be close on 10 and 11 and gave trump the points which is why he has 5. I dont think 12 is debatable... other than people on the right that for some reason cant stand a happy person that laughs most find her to have charisma and certainly find her more palatable as a likable person then they do trump. hell, even a lot of trump supports agree that he is an A$$ and not very likable as a person.


This person has used these same keys and his interpretation of the candidates to predict at a 90% accuracy rate. i think that is saying something about his judgment as it relates to these keys. fool proof? of course not... but i am a betting man and that seems like a no brainer bet to me.



ZRX1200
a year ago
Which one did he get wrong??
drglnc
  • drglnc
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago

Which one did he get wrong??

ZRX1200 wrote:



2000, where he predicted an Al Gore victory but did caution his model only pertained to the popular vote at the time and later changed his model for this reason. plus add in the Florida vote count nightmare of that election and it is easy to see how that one got away from him.
MACS
a year ago

Cant wait for that "evidence" that trump and rudypoo promised for the last 4 years...

drglnc wrote:



It's out there if you care to look.
MaduroJorge
a year ago
I see 5thru12 against The Cackler
ZRX1200
a year ago
Who couldn’t see democrats getting dudes named Chad pregnant?…..
MaduroJorge
a year ago
😂 😂

The old pregnant Chad trick
drglnc
  • drglnc
  • Herf-A-Holic Topic Starter
a year ago

It's out there if you care to look.

MACS wrote:


Sure it is… that’s why the took it court and won all those cases based on the evidence provided right? Oh… wait… um, I mean that’s why they had a big press conference and released the evidence they promised over and over and over again right? Oh… wait… um… that’s why… oh nvm… we will just wait for it… 2 more weeks right?
jeebling
a year ago

he (and i) acknowledge that it could be close on 10 and 11 and gave trump the points which is why he has 5. I dont think 12 is debatable... other than people on the right that for some reason cant stand a happy person that laughs most find her to have charisma and certainly find her more palatable as a likable person then they do trump. hell, even a lot of trump supports agree that he is an A$$ and not very likable as a person.


This person has used these same keys and his interpretation of the candidates to predict at a 90% accuracy rate. i think that is saying something about his judgment as it relates to these keys. fool proof? of course not... but i am a betting man and that seems like a no brainer bet to me.



drglnc wrote:



I see. Yes, Trump can be an ass which is part of his charisma for a certain group of people. But it does enrage a great many people. I guess the laughing candidate thing doesn’t push my charisma button but it’s not because I can’t stand happy people. Her laughter and comments just don’t resonate with me. I don’t begrudge her being happy but it seems like awkward, nervous laughter and word salad. That’s just me though. More to the point I don’t understand her policy stances on most things. The debate is going to be a doozy.
Stogie1020
a year ago

I see. Yes, Trump can be an ass which is part of his charisma for a certain group of people. But it does enrage a great many people. I guess the laughing candidate thing doesn’t push my charisma button but it’s not because I can’t stand happy people. Her laughter and comments just don’t resonate with me. I don’t begrudge her being happy but it seems like awkward, nervous laughter and word salad. That’s just me though. More to the point I don’t understand her policy stances on most things. The debate is going to be a doozy.

jeebling wrote:



See? You do have something in common with kamala.
Users browsing this topic