Yes, this is a screw up, they shouldn't have done this and we expect better from our side of the aisle.

😟

DrafterX wrote:

Yes, this is a screw up, they shouldn't have done this and we expect better from our side of the aisle.

😟

DrafterX wrote:

True.. true... much like the leaking of ICE raids.. which was pretty much overlooked... 😟

DrafterX wrote:

This is not a political issue."

rfenst wrote:

Had highest hope for you, of the Trump 6 here to not deflect and redirect.
-They used the wrong communications system.
-They inadvertantly added a reporter.
-They should come clean, own the mistake, it shouldn't have happened, investigate it.
-Explain how it went wrong.

I guess I'll look on the brightside that there hasn't been any .... Sleepy\Pedo\Crooked Joe and the Biden Crime Family, llather, rinse repeat cycle hasn't been offered..... yet.

Maybe they should continue communicating using Signal, always have a reporter on the thread, and add cool emoji's like a fist, and american flag, and an explosion.

However, with the emojis being used, how do we know this is really Walz, vs his account being hacked by a 5th grader?

8trackdisco wrote:

How we doing on the feigned outrage today?

HockeyDad wrote:

Introduction
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has identified cyber espionage activity by People’s
Republic of China (PRC) government-affiliated threat actors targeting commercial telecommunications
infrastructure. This activity enabled the theft of customer call records and the compromise of private
communications for a limited number of highly targeted individuals. While applicable to all audiences, this
guidance specifically addresses “highly targeted” individuals who are in senior government or senior political
positions and likely to possess information of interest to these threat actors. CISA is releasing this best
practice guidance to promote protections for mobile communications from exploitation by PRC-affiliated and
other malicious cyber threat actors.
Best Practices
CISA strongly urges highly targeted individuals to immediately review and apply the best practices below to
protect mobile communications. Highly targeted individuals should assume that all communications between
mobile devices—including government and personal devices—and internet services are at risk of interception
or manipulation. While no single solution eliminates all risks, implementing these best practices significantly
enhances protection of sensitive communications against government-affiliated and other malicious cyber
actors. Organizations may already have these best practices in place, such as secure communication
platforms1 and multifactor authentication (MFA) policies. In cases where organizations do not, apply the
following best practices to your mobile devices.
General Recommendations
Apply these best practices to your devices and online accounts.
1. Use only end-to-end encrypted communications.
 Adopt a free messaging application for secure communications that guarantees end-to-end
encryption, such as Signal or similar apps. CISA recommends an end-to-end encrypted messaging
app that is compatible with both iPhone and Android operating systems, allowing for text message
interoperability across platforms. Such apps may also offer clients for MacOS, Windows, and Linux,
and sometimes the web. These apps typically support one-on-one text chats, group chats with up to
1,000 participants, and encrypted voice and video calls. Additionally, they may include features
like disappearing messages and images, which can enhance privacy. When selecting an end-to-end
encrypted messaging app, evaluate the extent to which the app and associated services collect
and store metadata.

All those links FYI were stories the “reporter” that was added made up.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Then later you can’t keep me and DMV straight, but that’s probably my fault.

ZRX1200 wrote:

Guidance issuedunder the last admin by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)

(see guidline #1)

https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-12/guidance-mobile-communications-best-practices.pdf 

Stogie1020 wrote:

I'm a bit lost. Those stories were written by different people. Also, how were they 'made up'?

The_Ayatollah_of_RocknRolla wrote:

I think I know the difference.

-One of you rarely if ever says something critical Trump or his staff.
-One of you as a default setting compares most thing to Crooked/Sleepy/Pedo Joe because they are a one trick pony.
-One of you follows the program step by step. Attack, don't admit anyhting wrong. Plow forward.
-One of you puts whatever the Trump dogma is ahead of accountability, common sense and right and wrong.
-One of you hid for two or three days, waiting to get programmed to come up with the talking points to respond to the Signal Goat rodeo.

Or is it two, three, four, or five of you?

Won't matter, except it will.

We will all end up suffering as the 1/3rd of the country not blindly Democratic or blindly Trumpian decides with Goal making without Strategy, without thinking about Tactics, regularly blowing up like a Hamas suicide bomber on the Execution, ending in poor results.

Trumpublicans, Republicans (moderate and "soft") are going to end up in the woodshed at the midterms. And you and your bretheran will get all the credit.

Enjoy it.

8trackdisco wrote:

Pretty sure neither one of us two waited to get programmed……DMV is a good guy. I sent him pictures of a wide stance from the Salt Lake City airport bathroom and he still thinks I’m OK.

Credit?

Who TF cares about CREDIT? 98.2% of voters were tired of how extreme the commies have gotten. And I no longer care about the opinions of people that think status quo from DC is fine. And the programming of “culture” and screens is ok as long as the jello is green not orange.

What do you SERIOUSLY think was going to come of this specific event? No times or locations. If the POS commie tool that was added was so concerned why didn’t he say “Hey guys, STOP…I shouldn’t be on this”. Why isn’t that mentioned?

For all of your palpable HATE for Cheeto Jesus, he has stood up for his staff over this. He isn’t the problem of this situation. Whoever screwed up adding this dip stick I’d like to see resign.

ZRX1200 wrote: