VAT analogy:
So, you earn $100k/year and someone else earns $10 million/year, but is a miser and spends less than you do. So, he pays even less tax than you do! Yet he uses the U.S.'s massive infrastructure to earn his money? Is it fair he should only pay what you have to pay?
Besides, the poor spend almost all their money on necessities. Rich people don't. It's a regressive tax.
rfenst wrote: