Jack, cite which one of my statements you disagree with, and lets debate the pros & cons of its factuality or lack thereof. Just shouting school yard insults addresses nothing but your immaturity.
Lizardo, if you want to talk preposterous correlation, ask yourself under whose leadership America experienced the worst terrorist attack on the contiguous United States since the civil war? It was under the Bush administration's watch, and according to then national security advisor Condoleeza Rice, the administration had been warned ahead of time, so I guess they're responsible using your half-baked logic; which I do not subscribe to.
The fact that no one is attacking us this very moment does not diminish the fact the stakes have been raised in attacking America on American soil. I'm older than you son, and I can recall a lifetime of horrific terrorist attacks on European soil, so this stuff is nothing new. Now the impetus to do likewise on American soil has been irepairably heightened. It's likely a matter of when and not if. Thank god for the Atlantic.
Simply claiming the group (the Bush administration) that created the escalated threat of terrorist attacks at home since 9/11 is responsible for preventing all similar catastrophies in the future is an example of an irrational delusion of an uninformed mind. It's the oldest advertiosing trick in the book: create a problem (threat of terrorist attack), then offer a solution to the problem you've created for a nominal fee (re-election). Works everytime. If not, pull out the gay marraige amendment.
