I'm posting two separate emails I sent to whiny, cry baby sports writers on the West Coast. I won't give you their names but the email is filled with their quotes and my rebuttals. Here's the first one:
Dear Trojan Whiner:
I read your recent article/editorial on MSNBC on the farcical nature of the BCS. I couldn’t agree more with most of your opinions; however I do take exception to some of your comments regarding LSU. Especially this part,
“… And before all the Cajuns start ragin’, let me say that Louisiana State University has a splendid team and should be a solid No. 2. Nick Saban is a near-genius (I don’t like to bestow the full honor on any coach of any sport). The Tigers have a punishing defense and an effective offense.
But there isn’t a team in America today that plays the complete game like USC. The Trojans have a dynamic passing attack mixed with a powerful running attack. On defense, they stuff the run, rush the passer and rise to every occasion…”
These particular sentiments portray you as a West Coast cry baby who apparently hasn’t taken the time to examine the statistics or watch any of the LSU football games. I have watched Southern Cal and concur that they have an outstanding football team. But to trivialize LSU or its schedule is ridiculous. Your following comments are even more idiotic,
“ USC scheduled bowl-bound Auburn, bowl-bound Hawaii, (usually bowl-bound) BYU, and (usually bowl-bound) Notre Dame. Of the two, USC is the one that said, “We’ll play anybody” while LSU’s statement was, “Let’s pluck a few pansies.”
The reason USC scheduled those schools was because the PAC-10 lacks quality competition for a great team like USC. They have no choice but to outside of the conference to be challenged. LSU, on the other hand, has played the following bowl bound teams, all from within their own SEC.
1) Georgia (10-3) of which two losses were LSU.
2) Auburn (7-5)
3) Ole Miss (9-3)
4) Florida (8-4)
5) Arkansas (8-4)
Total win/loss of LSU bowl bound teams – 42/19. ratio 68.9%
USC’s played the following bowl bound teams:
1) Auburn (7-5)
2) UCLA (6-6)
3) Hawaii (8-5)
4) Washington State (10-2)
Total win/loss of USC bowl bound teams – 31/18. ratio 63.3%
The two shared opponents (Auburn and Arizona) were each beaten by LSU and USC by near identical margins of victory. It seems to me, this would indicate near parity in the two teams (as is so notably reflected in the two human polls.)
Sorry to be so long winded but I just felt you slapped some unjustified comments in your article. Lastly, I would like to totally agree with you that the National Championship should be between USC and LSU. How can a team (OU) which didn’t even win their conference qualify for the National Title Game? Computers are supposed to be 100% logic… go figure ‘cause I find no logic in this ranking system.
Regards,
Grond
(GO TIGERS!!)
This was written before the LSU-OU game.