drjothen

that was a very nice and pleasant post.

my posts in fact are monolouges designed to provoke and i think i have a bit of sucess doing that.

bill mahr is correct. i like and liked truman, carter, and jack kennedy all for different reasons.

kerry? who knows. i don't have a clue about him or anything he says. he is another politician. on the other hand bush is a scroundrel. nadar is past his prime and should go fishing or do what i do, sit in the yard and listen to books on tape and watch the birds.

from what i understand the dicking around about the height of the lecterns heights does show a certain short man complex on bush's part, something i am familiar with. from what i understand, the questions have already been suggested to the two "candidates."
they might as well have cue cards. i think in an open debate, kerry is quicker and bush is slower and kerry could make him look like a fool, so like a race horse, they have been weighted accordingly.

i'll watch the debate, and, like watching an auto race, look for the accident, but they will both have training wheels and drive slowly, so i don't expect much excitement.

but don't knock soft core porn, it's a start.

LOL,

Thank you for your response Rick. Even though I think you may be surprised at what may happen at a true open forum debate. Many experts say that is where Bush is at his prime and when he is the most relazed. Kerry has to habit of answering too quickly and then not shutting up. It will be curious tonight to see if Kerry continues to try to squeeze 1000 words into one minute.

Thanks for the exchange.

DRJ