But Jamie is correct that Sean Peyton was unfairly suspended.

Shhh.

Let them obsess over our obsession.

so, your reading comprehension sucks and when confronted about it, you mouth off...

that actually explains your entire grasp of the wells report...

I agree, but the comparison is apples to oranges.

I think I got this figured out.... they should play with a solid ball... maybe made out of transparent aluminum or somethin... 😟

👍

I did at first. Because that's what we were told.

But I now say No.

Because the evidence simply isn't there. The balls were not proven to be below what could be considered proper, given the conditions.

Or, if they did, then the Colts did it too. Because using the same litmus test of arbitrarily picking and choosing which gauge you use, the Colts balls failed 3 out of 4, and these were measured after sitting in the warm referee office for almost all of halftime.

Mouth off?

LOL!

And how does that explain my "entire grasp" of the Wells report?

You speak in code, then get angry for some reason.

Don't blame me.

Perhaps a better answer:

If it is proven that the balls were deflated, then I believe Brady would have to be involved.

But my belief that Brady was guilty was built on a false premise: that the balls were actually deflated.

I believed the 2 psi lie that Chris Mortensen spewed and the NFL perpetuated with 4 months of silence.

mouthing off is what I call your asinine ramblings about your team's innocence... lots of other things it could be called, I'm just being nicer than usual...

and you obviously have a reading comprehension problem for you to believe what you do and try to base it off of the well's report...

not sure what "code" you speak of or why you think I'd get angry over something this silly... but you are being a troll and that's why you're being treated like one...

He might be.

But the only thing the emails PROVE without a doubt, is that nothing is private. And it justifies (after the fact) his refusal to provide his personal cell phone to the league.

$50k fine and a simple apology if the Pats would have just fessed up in the beginning. Both sides really screwed the pooch on this one. Makes for good talk radio though, I'm enjoying the circus.

But you say to "fess up".

My point is the balls weren't low. And if the nfl revealed the data right away the science would matter more than an obscure reference to a nickname.

The league had no reason to attack TB. I think they simply screwed up and are trying to save face by manipulating public opinion.

Think about the penalty.

$1 million.

2 draft picks.

4 games.

All on a case that would have been thrown out of court based on lack of evidence.